Re: [xml] MIT License question

2017-08-28 Thread Daniel Veillard
   Hi,

  It seems to me most companies (smartphones, car entertainment systems,...)
just pick the libxml2 and libxslt licances for display as coming from the
distributions. But I am not a lawyer, and this is not a legal advice, check
your lawyers for a real answer, and considering your business I'm sure
you have tons of those :-(

Daniel

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 01:02:19PM -0700, Brad Wait wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Our product uses libxml2 and these components:
> 
>- sort
>- trio
>- xslt
> 
> 
> Is it sufficient to include the main libxml2 MIT License (with its various
> copyright owners etc).to cover each of these components?  Or, are there
> separate licenses for each? If the latter, where can I find these?
> 
> Thanks
> Brad

> ___
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml


-- 
Daniel Veillard  | Red Hat Developers Tools http://developer.redhat.com/
veill...@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
___
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml


[xml] MIT License question

2017-08-07 Thread Brad Wait
Hi,

Our product uses libxml2 and these components:

   - sort
   - trio
   - xslt


Is it sufficient to include the main libxml2 MIT License (with its various
copyright owners etc).to cover each of these components?  Or, are there
separate licenses for each? If the latter, where can I find these?

Thanks
Brad
___
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml