Re: [xmlsec] lasso is impacted by removal of soap.{c,h}

2022-06-06 Thread Aleksey Sanin 

It is more than 6 years since SOAP functions in xmlsec were deprecated.
Looks like Lasso removed the dependency quite some time ago as well:

https://git.entrouvert.org/lasso.git/commit/?id=760eb947ab5888992dff39c76b7129178fd134f1

Any objections if I remove these functions from xmlsec?

Thanks,

Aleksey

On 4/20/16 12:32 PM, Aleksey Sanin wrote:

Just shipped 1.2.22 with SOAP restored. Hope this will help.

Best,

Aleksey

On 4/15/16 7:41 AM, Benjamin Dauvergne wrote:

Hi Aleksey,

We were using the implementations in soap.{c,h} in lasso
(http://lasso.entrouvert.org/) a GPL library for implementing SAML 2.0. It
breaks the expected ABI from xmlsec1 from our side. Would you consider re-adding
it ? It's not really difficult for us to implement a work-around (we only use
accessor functions like GetBody, GetHeaer, etc.) but it could break many
deployments if they update libxmlsec.


___
xmlsec mailing list
xmlsec@aleksey.com
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

___
xmlsec mailing list
xmlsec@aleksey.com
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

Re: [xmlsec] lasso is impacted by removal of soap.{c,h}

2016-04-20 Thread Aleksey Sanin 
Just shipped 1.2.22 with SOAP restored. Hope this will help.

Best,

Aleksey

On 4/15/16 7:41 AM, Benjamin Dauvergne wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
> 
> We were using the implementations in soap.{c,h} in lasso
> (http://lasso.entrouvert.org/) a GPL library for implementing SAML 2.0. It
> breaks the expected ABI from xmlsec1 from our side. Would you consider 
> re-adding
> it ? It's not really difficult for us to implement a work-around (we only use
> accessor functions like GetBody, GetHeaer, etc.) but it could break many
> deployments if they update libxmlsec.
> 
___
xmlsec mailing list
xmlsec@aleksey.com
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

Re: [xmlsec] lasso is impacted by removal of soap.{c,h}

2016-04-15 Thread Aleksey Sanin 
Ops... Sorry about that. Let me see what I can do.

Aleksey

On 4/15/16 7:41 AM, Benjamin Dauvergne wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
> 
> We were using the implementations in soap.{c,h} in lasso
> (http://lasso.entrouvert.org/) a GPL library for implementing SAML 2.0. It
> breaks the expected ABI from xmlsec1 from our side. Would you consider 
> re-adding
> it ? It's not really difficult for us to implement a work-around (we only use
> accessor functions like GetBody, GetHeaer, etc.) but it could break many
> deployments if they update libxmlsec.
> 
___
xmlsec mailing list
xmlsec@aleksey.com
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec