Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.8.0
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:20:31 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemà wrote: [...] I'm running on an intel GMA 945, Centrino Duo T2400 1,83GHz and I can now watch 720p videos without any glitches or slowdowns! 1080p still not watchable tough :( (will I ever be able to do so?). If this is H.264 encoded video, then your CPU is just too slow, because only one core is used for video decoding. You might try ffmpeg from the frame-based multithreading repository to use both CPU cores during playback. Regards, Tino ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.8.0
'Twas brillig, and Stephan Raue at 23/07/09 23:46 did gyre and gimble: it fails to build with follow error: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/stephan/projects/OpenELEC.work/build.OpenELEC.intel.i386.uClibc/xf86-video-intel-2.8.0/uxa' CCuxa.o In file included from uxa.c:37: uxa-priv.h:46:35: error: X11/extensions/shmstr.h: No such file or directory In file included from uxa.c:37: uxa-priv.h:324: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'uxa_shm_funcs' uxa-priv.h:328: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'ShmFuncsPtr' uxa-priv.h:334: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration uxa.c: In function 'uxa_driver_init': uxa.c:527: error: 'uxa_shm_funcs' undeclared (first use in this function) uxa.c:527: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once uxa.c:527: error: for each function it appears in.) uxa.c:527: error: too many arguments to function 'ShmRegisterFuncs' make[3]: *** [uxa.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/stephan/projects/OpenELEC.work/build.OpenELEC.intel.i386.uClibc/xf86-video-intel-2.8.0/uxa' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/stephan/projects/OpenELEC.work/build.OpenELEC.intel.i386.uClibc/xf86-video-intel-2.8.0' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/stephan/projects/OpenELEC.work/build.OpenELEC.intel.i386.uClibc/xf86-video-intel-2.8.0' make: *** [system] Fehler 2 uxa/uxa-priv.h contains: #include X11/X.h #define NEED_EVENTS #include X11/Xproto.h #ifdef MITSHM #define _XSHM_SERVER_ #include X11/extensions/shmstr.h #endif in master Peter Hutterer has commited patch 0a4c4c5fe8ebad2dd13f5770bd90a194eebb2890 from 2009-07-18 to lets build against xextproto 7.1 that are not included in that release. Yup. It wasn't in with enough testing time I believe. Just cherry pick the patch if you're using the super-duper up-to-date stuff. xserver itself wont compile with any released version with these protocol changes either, so it's not really too much to ask :) Peter said that about half the drivers need patches for the protocol stuff, so intel is not the only one that will affect things in this regard. Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/] ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.8.0
Zitat von Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie: Just cherry pick the patch if you're using the super-duper up-to-date stuff. xserver itself wont compile with any released version with these protocol changes either, so it's not really too much to ask :) i know it and xserver now runs for me with recent intel-master-git-driver with some issues Peter said that about half the drivers need patches for the protocol stuff, so intel is not the only one that will affect things in this regard. Col thank you, i have think you forgot this patch Stephan -- ### OpenELEC.tv ### The free and open Mediacenter Distribution 4 you http://www.openelec.tv ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
