Re: [PATCH app/xrandr] Document that --dpi and --fbmm options set DPI of whole X screen
On Saturday 10 June 2017 21:19:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 28 May 2017 23:33:59 Pali Rohár wrote: > > Explicitly document and make it clear that those options does not > > change DPI of some monitor output. Also state that these options > > have no useful meaning for multi-monitor configuration. > > I would like to remind this patch. Can you review/comment it? Any opinion on this patch? -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
[PATCH xserver] glamor: update "required EGL extensions" comment
From: Emil Velikov The extensions listed have not been needed in a while. Replace with the only remaining requirement. Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov --- Decided to keep KHR_gl_texture_2D_image as-is (as opposed to respinning the other patch I've just sent) since the hunk is badly outdated anyway. Can split/squash if people prefer. --- glamor/glamor.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/glamor/glamor.h b/glamor/glamor.h index 4ad28df17..5b15a46e5 100644 --- a/glamor/glamor.h +++ b/glamor/glamor.h @@ -155,8 +155,7 @@ extern _X_EXPORT struct gbm_device *glamor_egl_get_gbm_device(ScreenPtr screen); * * The EGL layer needs to have the following extensions working: * - * .EGL_KHR_gl_texture_2D_image - * .EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import + * .EGL_KHR_surfaceless_context * */ extern _X_EXPORT Bool glamor_supports_pixmap_import_export(ScreenPtr screen); -- 2.13.0 ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
[PATCH xserver] glamor: remove no longer needed KHR_gl_texture_2D_image requirement
From: Emil Velikov
The code that needed it was introduced with commit 7cfd9cc2327 ("Add
DRI3 support to glamor") back in 2013. And was nuked a couple of years
ago with commit 51984dddfcc ("glamor: Delay making pixmaps shareable
until we need to.")
Cc: Eric Anholt
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
glamor/glamor_egl.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/glamor/glamor_egl.c b/glamor/glamor_egl.c
index b0d3e9efe..53a74b8da 100644
--- a/glamor/glamor_egl.c
+++ b/glamor/glamor_egl.c
@@ -665,7 +665,6 @@ glamor_egl_init(ScrnInfoPtr scrn, int fd)
goto error; \
}
-GLAMOR_CHECK_EGL_EXTENSION(KHR_gl_texture_2D_image);
GLAMOR_CHECK_EGL_EXTENSION(KHR_surfaceless_context);
if (eglBindAPI(EGL_OPENGL_API)) {
--
2.13.0
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: Stabilizing Xdmx -- advice
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 16:53 -0400, jrmarsha wrote: > I'm a bioinformatics graduate with at most a month and a half to work on > this. I think this is beyond my paygrade to just pick up and try to > handle anything touching openGL. Sure. The offer to check out the backtrace still stands (Xdmx should print a backtrace when it crashes just like any other server), consider this list an oracle that consumes backtraces and produces patches ;) - ajax ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: Stabilizing Xdmx -- advice
I'm a bioinformatics graduate with at most a month and a half to work on this. I think this is beyond my paygrade to just pick up and try to handle anything touching openGL. On 06/28/2017 04:53 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 13:50 -0400, Joshua Marshall wrote: Hello all, Xdmx is giving me a fair bit of trouble. In particular regard to segfaulting. Now, I'm assuming all the easy to catch stuff is already done, so where in general should I give attention to improving the state of Xdmx? Probably an unwise assumption, dmx doesn't get much active attention (though we do enjoy deleting code from it). I sent a patch for a crash in the GLX code a bit ago: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/162156/ Which I need to revisit to fix properly, but which seems to work at least on the first generation. If you wanted to address the review feedback and resubmit it that'd be awesome (I'm blowing up some other glx code at the moment so I'll get back to it eventually, but Xorg and Xwayland are more urgent targets for me). Beyond that: if you're having a crash, post the backtrace here and we'll help figure it out. The GLX proxy is really the ickiest part of that server, the rest is pretty docile I find. - ajax ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: Stabilizing Xdmx -- advice
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 13:50 -0400, Joshua Marshall wrote: > Hello all, > > Xdmx is giving me a fair bit of trouble. In particular regard to > segfaulting. Now, I'm assuming all the easy to catch stuff is > already done, so where in general should I give attention to > improving the state of Xdmx? Probably an unwise assumption, dmx doesn't get much active attention (though we do enjoy deleting code from it). I sent a patch for a crash in the GLX code a bit ago: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/162156/ Which I need to revisit to fix properly, but which seems to work at least on the first generation. If you wanted to address the review feedback and resubmit it that'd be awesome (I'm blowing up some other glx code at the moment so I'll get back to it eventually, but Xorg and Xwayland are more urgent targets for me). Beyond that: if you're having a crash, post the backtrace here and we'll help figure it out. The GLX proxy is really the ickiest part of that server, the rest is pretty docile I find. - ajax ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: [PATCH xserver 0/4] meson building Xorg server on Cygwin
On 27/06/2017 17:45, Adam Jackson wrote: On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 14:54 +0100, Jon Turney wrote: Additions to meson build for building the Xorg server on Cygwin (cf. changes to autotools build in commit c7b16255) Note that 4/4 relies on a meson PR which is not yet accepted. Jon Turney (4): Move statically linked xorgxkb files from dixmods to a separate directory meson: Shuffle around subdirs so we build Xorg loadable modules after Xorg meson: Use --export-all-symbols when building PE/COFF objects 1/3 broke 'make check' because it missed test/Makefile.am. Fixed that up and merged these three: Thanks for catching that. ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
