Re: [ATCH 0/5] GLX context tag reimplementation

2011-03-23 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:02:12 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
 GLX, apparently as some sort of elaborate prank, has both context IDs and
 context tags.  These are _almost_ identical; the functional difference is
 that you're allowed to continue to mention the tag of a deleted context
 as long as it's still your current context.
 
 The sample implementation of tags has a difficult time with context
 lifetime, because we have to keep track of things in two places and be
 sure we're not freeing things before we mean to be and blah blah
 unmanaged runtimes sure do suck.  But fortunately there's a simpler
 implementation that I believe to be within the letter of the law, which
 is what the first patch in this series is.
 
 The rest is merely cleanup.

This series is:

Reviewed-by:Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net


pgptwmvSAlXLp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

[ATCH 0/5] GLX context tag reimplementation

2011-03-21 Thread Adam Jackson
GLX, apparently as some sort of elaborate prank, has both context IDs and
context tags.  These are _almost_ identical; the functional difference is
that you're allowed to continue to mention the tag of a deleted context
as long as it's still your current context.

The sample implementation of tags has a difficult time with context
lifetime, because we have to keep track of things in two places and be
sure we're not freeing things before we mean to be and blah blah
unmanaged runtimes sure do suck.  But fortunately there's a simpler
implementation that I believe to be within the letter of the law, which
is what the first patch in this series is.

The rest is merely cleanup.

- ajax

___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel