Re: Dual PCI-E radeon R420 R700 KMS xorg 1.9.5 linux 2.6.37.6 - Mesa DRI bug.
Quoting Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:19 PM, wal...@free.fr wrote: Hi All, I was trying the last xorg packages available (Xorg 1.9.5) with my dual PCI-E express configuration (kernel 2.6.37.6). Everything work fine, with two X11 instances for each board, except the DRI (Mesa) operation on the secondary board. The secondary board log is OK, and shows that the DRI module start without any error. When I launch, e.g. a xscreensaver Mesa demo, the software lock-up and nothing happened on the screen. We can notice that, the first board works flawlessly (R700), and the secondary board (R420) works perfectly when using the same configuration and this board alone. Everything look like the secondary board (R420) is fully operational with Mesa: DISPLAY=:1.0 xdriinfo Screen 0: r300 Any idea ? Are you trying to use xinerama? Direct rendering doesn't work with xinerama. Alex Xinerama is disabled in this configuration. And I use two X11 instances, on per radeon board: root 3322 2.0 1.3 36712 27416 tty9 Ss+ Jun01 5:40 /usr/X11R6/bin/X :0 -audit 0 -auth /usr/gnome/var/gdm/:0.Xauth vt9 root 9561 4.8 0.3 16116 8072 tty63Ss+ 00:30 0:00 /usr/X11R6/bin/X :1 -layout x800-dualcard-e2209hds-1 -allowMouseOpenFail -allowNonLocalXvidtune -novtswitch -sharevts vt63 Wallak A last issue, I've tried with last packages available and Xorg 1.10.1 with the same kernel. The secondary board in this case was unusable. The secondary server failed to start. I don't know the status with 1.10.2. Best Regards, Wallak. ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Dual PCI-E radeon R420 R700 KMS xorg 1.9.5 linux 2.6.37.6 - Mesa DRI bug.
Hi All, I was trying the last xorg packages available (Xorg 1.9.5) with my dual PCI-E express configuration (kernel 2.6.37.6). Everything work fine, with two X11 instances for each board, except the DRI (Mesa) operation on the secondary board. The secondary board log is OK, and shows that the DRI module start without any error. When I launch, e.g. a xscreensaver Mesa demo, the software lock-up and nothing happened on the screen. We can notice that, the first board works flawlessly (R700), and the secondary board (R420) works perfectly when using the same configuration and this board alone. Everything look like the secondary board (R420) is fully operational with Mesa: DISPLAY=:1.0 xdriinfo Screen 0: r300 Any idea ? A last issue, I've tried with last packages available and Xorg 1.10.1 with the same kernel. The secondary board in this case was unusable. The secondary server failed to start. I don't know the status with 1.10.2. Best Regards, Wallak. ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: Dual PCI-E radeon R420 R700 KMS xorg 1.9.5 linux 2.6.37.6 - Mesa DRI bug.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:19 PM, wal...@free.fr wrote: Hi All, I was trying the last xorg packages available (Xorg 1.9.5) with my dual PCI-E express configuration (kernel 2.6.37.6). Everything work fine, with two X11 instances for each board, except the DRI (Mesa) operation on the secondary board. The secondary board log is OK, and shows that the DRI module start without any error. When I launch, e.g. a xscreensaver Mesa demo, the software lock-up and nothing happened on the screen. We can notice that, the first board works flawlessly (R700), and the secondary board (R420) works perfectly when using the same configuration and this board alone. Everything look like the secondary board (R420) is fully operational with Mesa: DISPLAY=:1.0 xdriinfo Screen 0: r300 Any idea ? Are you trying to use xinerama? Direct rendering doesn't work with xinerama. Alex A last issue, I've tried with last packages available and Xorg 1.10.1 with the same kernel. The secondary board in this case was unusable. The secondary server failed to start. I don't know the status with 1.10.2. Best Regards, Wallak. ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
