Re: [PATCH damageproto (rev3) 1/3] Document changes in damage proto version 1.2
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:21:19 -0800, James Jones jajo...@nvidia.com wrote: Signed-off-by: James Jones jajo...@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Pierre-Loup Griffais pgriff...@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Robert Morell rmor...@nvidia.com --- damageproto.txt | 57 +- 1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) These changes look good to me; I'd like to see the whole change (doc, proto, config) in a single patch though, and it looks like we get to use protocol version 1.3, document version 1.3.0 and package version 1.3.0. Aside from that, Reviewed-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgpc9ndlAbiwv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: [PATCH damageproto (rev3) 1/3] Document changes in damage proto version 1.2
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:58:58 -0800, James Jones jajo...@nvidia.com wrote: OK, I've pushed the requested updates to proto and lib with your reviewed-by line to my github repositories. Once I get a review for the Xext changes, I'll send out all the pull requests. Thanks for reviewing! Note that for everything other than the X server, you get to push yourself. -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgpnGat7Oenql.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: [PATCH damageproto (rev3) 1/3] Document changes in damage proto version 1.2
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:02:49PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:58:58 -0800, James Jones jajo...@nvidia.com wrote: OK, I've pushed the requested updates to proto and lib with your reviewed-by line to my github repositories. Once I get a review for the Xext changes, I'll send out all the pull requests. Thanks for reviewing! Note that for everything other than the X server, you get to push yourself. Sure. James doesn't have an fd.o account, so I'll push them on his behalf. -- Aaron ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: [PATCH damageproto (rev3) 1/3] Document changes in damage proto version 1.2
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com wrote: ... James doesn't have an fd.o account, so I'll push them on his behalf. How does one get an fd.o account these days? I've tried a couple of times with out luck[1]. Pat --- [1] I just assumed the fd.o bogon-filters sent my requests to fd hell... ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: [PATCH damageproto (rev3) 1/3] Document changes in damage proto version 1.2
Pat Kane wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com wrote: ... James doesn't have an fd.o account, so I'll push them on his behalf. How does one get an fd.o account these days? I've tried a couple of times with out luck[1]. Process hasn't really changed in years - see the AccountRequests link on the front page of the fd.o wiki. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
