Re: AMD SUMO vs Xorg 7.7

2016-12-05 Thread Michel Dänzer 
On 05/12/16 05:19 PM, Alexander Konotop wrote:
> В Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:39:31 +0900
> Michel Dänzer  пишет:
> 
>> On 03/12/16 12:24 AM, Alexander Konotop wrote:
>>> Here it is.
>>> I think it might be xserver-xorg-video-radeon:amd64 (at line 360).  
>>
>> In the November 25-27 window you mentioned, xserver-xorg-video-radeon
>> was upgraded from 1:7.8.0-1 to 1:7.8.0-1+b1. That's a binary-only NMU,
>> i.e. the same package version was just recompiled against the newer
>> version of xserver-xorg-core, which was upgraded from 2:1.18.4-2 to
>> 2:1.19.0-2. The problem is more likely due to the latter than the former.
>>
>> Can you try confirming this using http://snapshot.debian.org/ ?
> 
> Yes, it looks like +b1 is the only upgrade since mid november.
> I run dist-upgrade quite often, so the same version but without +b1 most 
> likely was installed
> before. The same should be actual for xserver-xorg-core, 2:1.19.0-2 is 
> currently installed.

What I mean is: Can you go back to xserver-xorg-core 2:1.18.4-2 +
xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:7.8.0-1, and see if the problem occurs with
that combination?


P.S. In the meantime, enabling glamor and DRI3 might avoid the hangs.

-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer   |   http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
___
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org
https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati

Re: AMD SUMO vs Xorg 7.7

2016-12-05 Thread Alexander Konotop 
В Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:39:31 +0900
Michel Dänzer  пишет:

> On 03/12/16 12:24 AM, Alexander Konotop wrote:
> > Here it is.
> > I think it might be xserver-xorg-video-radeon:amd64 (at line 360).  
> 
> In the November 25-27 window you mentioned, xserver-xorg-video-radeon
> was upgraded from 1:7.8.0-1 to 1:7.8.0-1+b1. That's a binary-only NMU,
> i.e. the same package version was just recompiled against the newer
> version of xserver-xorg-core, which was upgraded from 2:1.18.4-2 to
> 2:1.19.0-2. The problem is more likely due to the latter than the former.
> 
> Can you try confirming this using http://snapshot.debian.org/ ?
> 
> 

Yes, it looks like +b1 is the only upgrade since mid november.
I run dist-upgrade quite often, so the same version but without +b1 most likely 
was installed
before. The same should be actual for xserver-xorg-core, 2:1.19.0-2 is 
currently installed.
___
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org
https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati