Re: [Yade-users] [Question #702735]: Possible reasons why not introduce gravity in triaxial compression tests in DEM
Question #702735 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702735 Status: Answered => Solved Leonard confirmed that the question is solved: Thanks Janek Kozicki, that solved my question. -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Yade-users] [Question #702735]: Possible reasons why not introduce gravity in triaxial compression tests in DEM
Question #702735 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702735 Status: Open => Answered Janek Kozicki proposed the following answer: I have no idea what robanmiller wanted to say. I suspect it's spam. The reason to don't introduce gravity in triaxial compression is that its effect is negligible. You can check this yourself. In yade examples directory you will find a triaxial test. Run this simulation with and without gravity and you will see that the result is the same. -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Yade-users] [Question #702735]: Possible reasons why not introduce gravity in triaxial compression tests in DEM
Question #702735 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702735 Leonard posted a new comment: Hi, Thanks for your reply. I am sorry that I didn't fully get the link between what you mentioned and DEM gravity. Could you please explain more details? Thanks Leonard -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Yade-users] [Question #702735]: Possible reasons why not introduce gravity in triaxial compression tests in DEM
Question #702735 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702735 robanmiller posted a new comment: The basic state lines (CSL) of triaxial pressure tests for both free and medium thick frameworks show that the basic void proportion is autonomous of the underlying thickness however increments with expansion in bond strength. Expanding the bond strength builds the expansion, which prompts a higher basic state void proportionhttps://pickleballcloud.com;>. -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yade-users] [Question #702735]: Possible reasons why not introduce gravity in triaxial compression tests in DEM
New question #702735 on Yade: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702735 Hi, Reading from literatures that most of the DEM studies on element tests (e.g., triaixal compression tests) don't introduce gravity. Do you know what are the possible reasons for this? Thanks Leonard -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
