[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1774666] Re: Bond interfaces stuck at 1500 MTU on Bionic

2018-07-10 Thread David Britton
** No longer affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Cosmic)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774666

Title:
  Bond interfaces stuck at 1500 MTU on Bionic

Status in cloud-init:
  Fix Released
Status in MAAS:
  Invalid
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in cloud-init source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Artful:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Cosmic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  When deploying a machine through MAAS with bonded network interfaces,
  the bond does not have a 9000 byte MTU applied despite the attached
  VLANs having had a 9000 MTU explicitly set. The MTU size is set on the
  bond members, but not on the bond itself in Netplan. Consequently,
  when the bond is brought up, the interface MTU is decreased from 9000
  to 1500. Manually changing the interface MTU after boot is successful.

  This is not observed when deploying Xenial on the same machine. The
  bond comes up at the expected 9000 byte MTU.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1774666/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1774666] Re: Bond interfaces stuck at 1500 MTU on Bionic

2018-07-10 Thread David Britton
** No longer affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)

** No longer affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Xenial)

** No longer affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Artful)

** No longer affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Bionic)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774666

Title:
  Bond interfaces stuck at 1500 MTU on Bionic

Status in cloud-init:
  Fix Released
Status in MAAS:
  Invalid
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in cloud-init source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Artful:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Cosmic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  When deploying a machine through MAAS with bonded network interfaces,
  the bond does not have a 9000 byte MTU applied despite the attached
  VLANs having had a 9000 MTU explicitly set. The MTU size is set on the
  bond members, but not on the bond itself in Netplan. Consequently,
  when the bond is brought up, the interface MTU is decreased from 9000
  to 1500. Manually changing the interface MTU after boot is successful.

  This is not observed when deploying Xenial on the same machine. The
  bond comes up at the expected 9000 byte MTU.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1774666/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1771885] Re: bionic: static maas missing search domain in systemd-resolve configuration

2018-06-05 Thread David Britton
Given the workaround available for maas & cloud-init this is working as
expected.  Thanks for the debugging everyone.

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: maas
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771885

Title:
  bionic: static maas missing search domain in systemd-resolve
  configuration

Status in cloud-init:
  Won't Fix
Status in juju:
  Fix Committed
Status in juju 2.3 series:
  Fix Released
Status in MAAS:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  juju: 2.4-beta2  
  MAAS: 2.3.0

  Testing deployment of LXD containers on bionic (specifically for an
  openstack deployment) lead to this problem:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-nova-cloud-controller/+bug/1765405

  Summary:

  previously, the DNS config in the LXD containers were the same as the
  host machines

  now, the DNS config is in systemd, the DNS server is set correctly,
  but the search domain is missing, so hostnames won't resolve.

  Working resolv.conf on xenial lxd container:

  nameserver 10.245.168.6
  search maas

  Non-working "systemd-resolve --status":

  ...
  Link 21 (eth0)
Current Scopes: DNS
 LLMNR setting: yes
  MulticastDNS setting: no
DNSSEC setting: no
  DNSSEC supported: no
   DNS Servers: 10.245.168.6

  Working (now able to resolve hostnames after modifying netplan and
  adding search domain):

  Link 21 (eth0)
Current Scopes: DNS
 LLMNR setting: yes
  MulticastDNS setting: no
DNSSEC setting: no
  DNSSEC supported: no
   DNS Servers: 10.245.168.6
DNS Domain: maas

  ubuntu@juju-6406ff-2-lxd-2:/etc$ host node-name
  node-name.maas has address 10.245.168.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1771885/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1774056] Re: Nodes fail to deploy at ''cloudinit'' running modules for final'

2018-06-05 Thread David Britton
** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774056

Title:
  Nodes fail to deploy at ''cloudinit'' running modules for final'

Status in cloud-init:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  machine-status:
current: provisioning error
message: 'Failed deployment: ''cloudinit'' running modules for final'

  No other errors seem detectable in the logs for that node. We require
  some expert triage for this one. I have attached all of the logs for
  one of the failing runs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1774056/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1600766] Re: initial dhcp has default hostname of ubuntu

2018-02-01 Thread David Britton
** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600766

Title:
  initial dhcp has default hostname of ubuntu

Status in cloud-init:
  Won't Fix
Status in juju:
  Invalid
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  When using the normal lxd-bridge, using a dnsmasq instance for dhcp,
  the initial dhcp is always the hostname 'ubuntu', and this is recorded
  in the dnsmasq's dhcp leases file.

  Presumably the dhcp is done before the container's hostname is set. A
  restart or dhcp renew seems to put the correct container name in the
  leases file.

  This is a problem when using the dnsmasq for local dns resolving for
  *.lxd, which is the standard way of doing host dns for containers, as
  new containers are not dns addressable without a restart or renew.

  Is there anyway get the correct hostname in the initial dhcp? Or maybe
  renew after setting the hostname?

  Related Bugs:
   * LXC/LXD Issue https://github.com/lxc/lxd/issues/2244

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1600766/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1743212] Re: SSL Cert for cloud-init.org invalid

2018-01-15 Thread David Britton
Cert has been fixed.

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743212

Title:
  SSL Cert for cloud-init.org invalid

Status in cloud-init:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  If I visit cloud-init.org i get a cert that is only valid for cloud-init.io.
  Is the .org site legitimate or a bogus site? Is it a simple misconfiguration?
  I reached the .org site through Google, so it must be popular in some sense.
  A picture is worth a thousand words, so have a look at the attached 
screenshot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1743212/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1731868] Re: vmware reported as 'EC2', 'None'

2017-12-06 Thread David Britton
Hi Merlijn

I added the cloud-init project on here, and we will target cloud-init
17.2 for this fix.

Just so you know, this is currently a *warning* and your system should
be usable even with this warning message displaying when you log in.  If
you find that it's blocking you (other than being annoying), please do
comment back.


Thanks for reporting this and helping to make Ubuntu better!

** Also affects: cloud-init
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-init
Milestone: None => 17.2

** Changed in: cloud-init
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Chad Smith (chad.smith)

** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Scott Moser (smoser) => Chad Smith (chad.smith)

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1731868

Title:
  vmware reported as 'EC2', 'None'

Status in cloud-init:
  In Progress
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Just bootstrapped a Juju controller on a Vmware vsphere cloud and I
  got a message from cloud-init that the system identified the
  datasource as ec2. Hypervisor: VMware ESXi, 6.5.0, 5310538

  
  **
  # A new feature in cloud-init identified possible datasources for#
  # this system as:#
  #   ['Ec2', 'None']  #
  # However, the datasource used was: OVF  #
  ##
  # In the future, cloud-init will only attempt to use datasources that#
  # are identified or specifically configured. #
  # For more information see   #
  #   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1669675  #
  ##
  # If you are seeing this message, please file a bug against  #
  # cloud-init at  #
  #https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+filebug?field.tags=dsid  #
  # Make sure to include the cloud provider your instance is   #
  # running on.#
  ##
  # After you have filed a bug, you can disable this warning by launching  #
  # your instance with the cloud-config below, or putting that content #
  # into /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-warnings.cfg#
  ##
  # #cloud-config  #
  # warnings:  #
  #   dsid_missing_source: off #
  **

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1731868/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1727358] Re: cloud-init is slow to complete init on minimized images

2017-10-30 Thread David Britton
Marking as wont-fix for cloud-init for now as that would be a workaround
for the base problem that is not desired right now.  Adding linux-kvm to
evaluate why this difference exists between linux-generic and linux-kvm

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix

** Also affects: linux-kvm (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727358

Title:
  cloud-init is slow to complete init on minimized images

Status in cloud-init:
  Won't Fix
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-kvm package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in python3.6 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  http://paste.ubuntu.com/25816789/ for the full logs.

  cloud-init is very slow to complete its initialization steps.
  Specifically, the 'init' takes over 150 seconds.

  Cloud-init v. 17.1 running 'init-local' at Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:22:07 +. 
Up 2.39 seconds.
  2017-10-25 13:22:07,157 - util.py[WARNING]: did not find either path 
/sys/class/dmi/id or dmidecode command
  Cloud-init v. 17.1 running 'init' at Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:22:16 +. Up 
11.37 seconds.
  ci-info: Net device 
info+
  ci-info: 
++---+-+---+---+---+
  ci-info: | Device |   Up  | Address |  Mask | Scope | 
Hw-Address|
  ci-info: 
++---+-+---+---+---+
  ci-info: | ens3:  |  True | 192.168.100.161 | 255.255.255.0 |   .   | 
52:54:00:bb:ad:fb |
  ci-info: | ens3:  |  True |.|   .   |   d   | 
52:54:00:bb:ad:fb |
  ci-info: |  lo:   |  True |127.0.0.1|   255.0.0.0   |   .   | 
. |
  ci-info: |  lo:   |  True |.|   .   |   d   | 
. |
  ci-info: | sit0:  | False |.|   .   |   .   | 
. |
  ci-info: 
++---+-+---+---+---+
  ci-info: Route IPv4 
info
  ci-info: 
+---+---+---+-+---+---+
  ci-info: | Route |  Destination  |Gateway| Genmask | 
Interface | Flags |
  ci-info: 
+---+---+---+-+---+---+
  ci-info: |   0   |0.0.0.0| 192.168.100.1 | 0.0.0.0 |ens3  
 |   UG  |
  ci-info: |   1   | 192.168.100.0 |0.0.0.0|  255.255.255.0  |ens3  
 |   U   |
  ci-info: |   2   | 192.168.100.1 |0.0.0.0| 255.255.255.255 |ens3  
 |   UH  |
  ci-info: 
+---+---+---+-+---+---+
  2017-10-25 13:24:38,187 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed to resize filesystem 
(cmd=('resize2fs', '/dev/root'))
  2017-10-25 13:24:38,193 - util.py[WARNING]: Running module resizefs () failed
  Generating public/private rsa key pair.
  Your identification has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.
  Your public key has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.pub.
  The key fingerprint is:
  SHA256:LKNlCqqOgPB8KBKGfPhFO5Rs6fDMnAvVet/W9i4vLxY root@cloudimg
  The key's randomart image is:
  +---[RSA 2048]+
  | |
  |. +  |
  |   . O . |
  |o . % +. |
  |++.o %=.S|
  |+=ooo=+o. . .E   |
  |* +.+.   . o o.  |
  |=. .  . .=.  |
  |+.  . B= |
  +[SHA256]-+
  Generating public/private dsa key pair.
  Your identification has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key.
  Your public key has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key.pub.
  The key fingerprint is:
  SHA256:dNWNyBHqTUCl820/vL0dEhOVDFYJzqr1WeuqV1PAmjk root@cloudimg
  The key's randomart image is:
  +---[DSA 1024]+
  | .oo=X==o|
  |   =* *+.|
  |. = .B . |
  |   . o =E.. .|
  |S .oo+o..|
  |  o ..*+.|
  | .   +.=o|
  | .o *|
  |   .o..++|
  +[SHA256]-+
  Generating public/private ecdsa key pair.
  Your identification has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key.
  Your public key has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key.pub.
  The key fingerprint is:
  SHA256:N3RTlPa7KU5ryq6kJAO8Tiq90ub4P1DGSofn6jFkM3k root@cloudimg
  The key's randomart image is:
  +---[ECDSA 256]---+
  | .o. |
  | .o  |
  |   o  . o. . |
  |  +.*. . .  .|
  | .*XE   S o .|
  | oo++. .   . |
  | oo= o . .   .  o|
  |o.Oo. + o . .o.o |
  |oB=+.. . .o++o.  |
  +[SHA256]-+
  Generating public/private ed25519 key pair.
  Your identification has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ed25519_key.
  Your public key has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1701225] Re: cloud-init datasource using ec2 in openstack

2017-09-05 Thread David Britton
Closed per submitter request.  Feel free to re-open or re-file if seen
in the future.

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701225

Title:
  cloud-init datasource using ec2 in openstack

Status in cloud-init:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Spinning up an instance on a Canonical-internal OpenStack instance
  running  Icehouse I see this message when I ssh into it:

  https://pastebin.canonical.com/192210/

  $ dpkg-query -W -f='${Version}' cloud-init
  0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1701225/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1701297] Re: NTP reload failure (unable to read library) on overlayfs

2017-07-11 Thread David Britton
** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701297

Title:
  NTP reload failure (unable to read library) on overlayfs

Status in cloud-init:
  Won't Fix
Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After update [1] of cloud-init in Ubuntu (which landed in xenial-
  updates on 2017-06-27), it is causing NTP reload failures.

  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
  0ubuntu1~16.04.1

  In MAAS scenarios, this is causing the machine to fail to deploy.

  Related bugs:
   * bug 1645644: cloud-init ntp not using expected servers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1701297/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1690430] Re: [Hyper-V] Advanced networking support on Azure

2017-06-28 Thread David Britton
** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Merge proposal linked:
   https://code.launchpad.net/~smoser/cloud-init/+git/cloud-init/+merge/326373

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690430

Title:
  [Hyper-V] Advanced networking support on Azure

Status in cloud-init:
  Fix Committed
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  We are in the process of rolling out SR-IOV in Azure (available as a
  preview now, contact me offline and we can work out getting your
  subscription addedif you want to try it). In general our normal
  synthetic interface appears as eth0 and the VF comes in as eth1. We
  intend to bond these interfaces together so that if the VF goes down,
  or the VM is migrated to where no VF is present, eth0 remains as the
  valid default interface.

  At the moment we are handling the bonding via this script:
  
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/plain/tools/hv/bondvf.sh

  We were looking at ways to either integrate the behavior into cloud-
  init or invoke the script from cloud-init and do the right thing.

  We recently observed after https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
  /cloud-init/+bug/1669860 that the VF interface gets renamed to
  something like "enP1p0s2" but more recently as "rename2".

  Is it possible that 1669860 needs to be expanded to cover our case or
  is there something we should be doing to make sure that change is
  working properly for SR-IOV in Azure?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1690430/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1690430] Re: [Hyper-V] VF renaming on Azure

2017-06-28 Thread David Britton
There is an SRU in progress

[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] cloud-init 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 
(Waiting for approval)
[ubuntu/yakkety-proposed] cloud-init 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2 
(Waiting for approval)
[ubuntu/zesty-proposed] cloud-init 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 
(Waiting for approval)

That will address the blocking portion of this bug.  The interfaces will
not be bonded, but the instance will boot with basic networking and
allow anyone to bond the interfaces as a post-boot step however they
would like.

A more advanced solution will be proposed.


** Also affects: cloud-init
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: udev (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Summary changed:

- [Hyper-V] VF renaming on Azure
+ [Hyper-V] Advanced networking support on Azure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690430

Title:
  [Hyper-V] Advanced networking support on Azure

Status in cloud-init:
  New

Bug description:
  We are in the process of rolling out SR-IOV in Azure (available as a
  preview now, contact me offline and we can work out getting your
  subscription addedif you want to try it). In general our normal
  synthetic interface appears as eth0 and the VF comes in as eth1. We
  intend to bond these interfaces together so that if the VF goes down,
  or the VM is migrated to where no VF is present, eth0 remains as the
  valid default interface.

  At the moment we are handling the bonding via this script:
  
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/plain/tools/hv/bondvf.sh

  We were looking at ways to either integrate the behavior into cloud-
  init or invoke the script from cloud-init and do the right thing.

  We recently observed after https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
  /cloud-init/+bug/1669860 that the VF interface gets renamed to
  something like "enP1p0s2" but more recently as "rename2".

  Is it possible that 1669860 needs to be expanded to cover our case or
  is there something we should be doing to make sure that change is
  working properly for SR-IOV in Azure?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1690430/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1693361] Re: cloud-init sometimes fails on dpkg lock due to concurrent apt-daily.service execution

2017-06-12 Thread David Britton
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #864681
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864681

** Also affects: apt via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864681
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693361

Title:
  cloud-init sometimes fails on dpkg lock due to concurrent apt-
  daily.service execution

Status in APT:
  Unknown
Status in cloud-init:
  Confirmed
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Yakkety:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Zesty:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Artful:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  apt-daily is now a systemd service rather than being invoked by
  cron.daily.  If one builds a custom AMI it is possible that the apt-
  daily.timer will fire during boot.  This can fire at the same time
  cloud-init is running and if cloud-init loses the race the invocation
  of apt (e.g. use of "packages:" in the config) will fail.

  There is a lot of discussion online about this change to apt-daily
  (e.g. unattended upgrades happening during business hours, delaying
  boot, etc.) and discussion of potential systemd changes regarding
  timers firing during boot (c.f.
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5659).

  While it would be better to solve this in apt itself, I suggest that
  cloud-init be defensive when calling apt and implement some retry
  mechanism.

  Various instances of people running into this issue:

  https://github.com/chef/bento/issues/609
  https://clusterhq.atlassian.net/browse/FLOC-4486
  https://github.com/boxcutter/ubuntu/issues/73
  
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/315502/how-to-disable-apt-daily-service-on-ubuntu-cloud-vm-image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apt/+bug/1693361/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1693361] Re: cloud-init sometimes fails on dpkg lock due to concurrent apt-daily.service execution

2017-06-12 Thread David Britton
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Zesty)

** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety)

** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Xenial)

** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Artful)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693361

Title:
  cloud-init sometimes fails on dpkg lock due to concurrent apt-
  daily.service execution

Status in cloud-init:
  Confirmed
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Yakkety:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Zesty:
  Confirmed
Status in cloud-init source package in Artful:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  apt-daily is now a systemd service rather than being invoked by
  cron.daily.  If one builds a custom AMI it is possible that the apt-
  daily.timer will fire during boot.  This can fire at the same time
  cloud-init is running and if cloud-init loses the race the invocation
  of apt (e.g. use of "packages:" in the config) will fail.

  There is a lot of discussion online about this change to apt-daily
  (e.g. unattended upgrades happening during business hours, delaying
  boot, etc.) and discussion of potential systemd changes regarding
  timers firing during boot (c.f.
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5659).

  While it would be better to solve this in apt itself, I suggest that
  cloud-init be defensive when calling apt and implement some retry
  mechanism.

  Various instances of people running into this issue:

  https://github.com/chef/bento/issues/609
  https://clusterhq.atlassian.net/browse/FLOC-4486
  https://github.com/boxcutter/ubuntu/issues/73
  
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/315502/how-to-disable-apt-daily-service-on-ubuntu-cloud-vm-image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1693361/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1693361] Re: cloud-init sometimes fails on dpkg lock due to concurrent apt-daily.service execution

2017-06-12 Thread David Britton
** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693361

Title:
  cloud-init sometimes fails on dpkg lock due to concurrent apt-
  daily.service execution

Status in cloud-init:
  New
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  apt-daily is now a systemd service rather than being invoked by
  cron.daily.  If one builds a custom AMI it is possible that the apt-
  daily.timer will fire during boot.  This can fire at the same time
  cloud-init is running and if cloud-init loses the race the invocation
  of apt (e.g. use of "packages:" in the config) will fail.

  There is a lot of discussion online about this change to apt-daily
  (e.g. unattended upgrades happening during business hours, delaying
  boot, etc.) and discussion of potential systemd changes regarding
  timers firing during boot (c.f.
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5659).

  While it would be better to solve this in apt itself, I suggest that
  cloud-init be defensive when calling apt and implement some retry
  mechanism.

  Various instances of people running into this issue:

  https://github.com/chef/bento/issues/609
  https://clusterhq.atlassian.net/browse/FLOC-4486
  https://github.com/boxcutter/ubuntu/issues/73
  
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/315502/how-to-disable-apt-daily-service-on-ubuntu-cloud-vm-image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1693361/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1646604] [NEW] event posting fails for check-cahce and init-local

2016-12-01 Thread David Britton
Public bug reported:

maas  2.1.2+bzr-0ubuntu1~16.04.1
cloud-init 0.7.8-49-g9e904bb-0ubuntu1~16.04.1


when I boot a xenial node with cloud-init, I get these 4 failure post backs:

Dec  1 07:16:53 bohr [CLOUDINIT] handlers.py[WARNING]: failed posting event: 
start: init-local/check-cache: attempting to read from cache [trust]
Dec  1 07:16:53 bohr [CLOUDINIT] handlers.py[WARNING]: failed posting event: 
finish: init-local/check-cache: SUCCESS: no cache found
Dec  1 07:16:53 bohr [CLOUDINIT] handlers.py[WARNING]: failed posting event: 
finish: init-local: SUCCESS: searching for local datasources
Dec  1 07:16:53 bohr [CLOUDINIT] handlers.py[WARNING]: failed posting event: 
start: init-network/check-cache: attempting to read from cache [trust]


I'd expect them to work and run cleanly.

paste of cloud-init log file:

http://paste.ubuntu.com/23564700/

Node deploys successfully, so this is not a major issue for us, but
seems like noise that should be fix.

** Affects: cloud-init
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: landscape

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646604

Title:
  event posting fails for check-cahce and init-local

Status in cloud-init:
  New

Bug description:
  maas  2.1.2+bzr-0ubuntu1~16.04.1
  cloud-init 0.7.8-49-g9e904bb-0ubuntu1~16.04.1

  
  when I boot a xenial node with cloud-init, I get these 4 failure post backs:

  Dec  1 07:16:53 bohr [CLOUDINIT] handlers.py[WARNING]: failed posting event: 
start: init-local/check-cache: attempting to read from cache [trust]
  Dec  1 07:16:53 bohr [CLOUDINIT] handlers.py[WARNING]: failed posting event: 
finish: init-local/check-cache: SUCCESS: no cache found
  Dec  1 07:16:53 bohr [CLOUDINIT] handlers.py[WARNING]: failed posting event: 
finish: init-local: SUCCESS: searching for local datasources
  Dec  1 07:16:53 bohr [CLOUDINIT] handlers.py[WARNING]: failed posting event: 
start: init-network/check-cache: attempting to read from cache [trust]

  
  I'd expect them to work and run cleanly.

  paste of cloud-init log file:

  http://paste.ubuntu.com/23564700/

  Node deploys successfully, so this is not a major issue for us, but
  seems like noise that should be fix.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1646604/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1646571] [NEW] apt failures non fatal, but cloud the log

2016-12-01 Thread David Britton
Public bug reported:

Better formatting: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23564366/

Dec 01 17:29:15 kepler cloud-init[1134]: 2016-12-01 17:29:15,900 - 
util.py[WARNING]: Running module apt-configure () failed
Dec 01 17:29:15 kepler cloud-init[1134]: [CLOUDINIT] util.py[WARNING]: Running 
module apt-configure () failed
Dec 01 17:29:15 kepler cloud-init[1134]: [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Running 
module apt-configure () failed
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/stages.py", line 792, in _run_modules
 freq=freq)
   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/cloud.py", line 70, in run
 return self._runners.run(name, 
functor, args, freq, clear_on_fail)
   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/helpers.py", line 199, in run
 results = functor(*args)
   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_apt_configure.py", line 
284, in handle
 ocfg = 
convert_to_v3_apt_format(ocfg)
   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_apt_configure.py", line 
748, in convert_to_v3_apt_format
 cfg = 
convert_v2_to_v3_apt_format(cfg)
   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_apt_configure.py", line 
714, in convert_v2_to_v3_apt_format
 oldkey))
 ValueError: Old and New apt format 
defined with unequal values True vs False @ apt_preserve_sources_list
D

** Affects: cloud-init
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

+ Better formatting: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23564366/
+ 
  Dec 01 17:29:15 kepler cloud-init[1134]: 2016-12-01 17:29:15,900 - 
util.py[WARNING]: Running module apt-configure () failed
  Dec 01 17:29:15 kepler cloud-init[1134]: [CLOUDINIT] util.py[WARNING]: 
Running module apt-configure () failed
  Dec 01 17:29:15 kepler cloud-init[1134]: [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Running 
module apt-configure () failed
-  Traceback (most recent call last):
-File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/stages.py", line 792, in _run_modules
-  freq=freq)
-File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/cloud.py", line 70, in run
-  return self._runners.run(name, 
functor, args, freq, clear_on_fail)
-File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/helpers.py", line 199, in run
-  results = functor(*args)
-File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_apt_configure.py", line 
284, in handle
-  ocfg = 
convert_to_v3_apt_format(ocfg)
-File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_apt_configure.py", line 
748, in convert_to_v3_apt_format
-  cfg = 
convert_v2_to_v3_apt_format(cfg)
-File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_apt_configure.py", line 
714, in convert_v2_to_v3_apt_format
-  oldkey))
-  ValueError: Old and New apt format 
defined with unequal values True vs False @ apt_preserve_sources_list
+  Traceback (most recent call last):
+    File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/stages.py", line 792, in _run_modules
+  freq=freq)
+    File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/cloud.py", line 70, in run
+  return self._runners.run(name, 
functor, args, freq, clear_on_fail)
+    File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/helpers.py", line 199, in run
+  results = functor(*args)
+    File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_apt_configure.py", line 
284, in handle
+  ocfg = 
convert_to_v3_apt_format(ocfg)
+    File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cl

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1461192] Re: TypeError: execv() arg 2 must contain only strings

2015-09-01 Thread David Britton
** Also affects: nova
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: nova

** Also affects: landscape
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: landscape/release-29
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: landscape/release-29
Milestone: None => 15.08

** Changed in: landscape/release-29
Milestone: 15.08 => 15.07

** Changed in: landscape/release-29
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: landscape
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1461192

Title:
  TypeError: execv() arg 2 must contain only strings

Status in Landscape Server:
  New
Status in Landscape Server release-29 series:
  New
Status in nova-compute package in Juju Charms Collection:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Got this during an HA Autopilot deployment:

  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.juju-log cmd.go:247 ceph:68: 
Rendering from template: nova.conf
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.juju-log cmd.go:247 ceph:68: 
Wrote template /etc/nova/nova.conf.
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.juju-log cmd.go:247 ceph:68: 
Libvirt secret changed for uuid 514c9fca-8cbe-11e2-9c52-3bc8c7819472.
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.juju-log cmd.go:247 ceph:68: 
Defining new libvirt secret for uuid 514c9fca-8cbe-11e2-9c52-3bc8c7819472.
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 Secret 514c9fca-8cbe-11e2-9c52-3bc8c7819472 created
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 Traceback (most recent call last):
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File 
"/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-nova-compute-2/charm/hooks/ceph-relation-changed", 
line
   390, in 
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 main()
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File 
"/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-nova-compute-2/charm/hooks/ceph-relation-changed", 
line
   384, in main
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 hooks.execute(sys.argv)
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File 
"/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-nova-compute-2/charm/hooks/charmhelpers/core/hookenv.py
  ", line 557, in execute
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 self._hooks[hook_name]()
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File 
"/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-nova-compute-2/charm/hooks/charmhelpers/core/host.py",
 
  line 312, in wrapped_f
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 f(*args, **kwargs)
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File 
"/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-nova-compute-2/charm/hooks/ceph-relation-changed", 
line
   284, in ceph_changed
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 key=relation_get('key'))
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File 
"/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-nova-compute-2/charm/hooks/nova_compute_utils.py", 
line
   564, in create_libvirt_secret
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 check_call(cmd)
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 535, in check_call
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 retcode = call(*popenargs, **kwargs)
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 522, in call
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 return Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs).wait()
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 710, in __init__
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 errread, errwrite)
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 1327, in 
_execute_child
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 raise child_exception
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 INFO unit.nova-compute/2.ceph-relation-changed 
logger.go:40 TypeError: execv() arg 2 must contain only strings
  2015-06-02 16:15:49 ERROR juju.worker.uniter.operation runhook.go:86 hook 
"ceph-relation-changed" failed: exit status 1

  
  That's:

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1454410] [NEW] Juno HA Deployment, percona on VIP, killed leader, compute did not reconnect

2015-05-12 Thread David Britton
Public bug reported:

ii  nova-common1:2014.2.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0   
 all  OpenStack Compute - common files
ii  nova-compute   1:2014.2.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0   
 all  OpenStack Compute - compute node base
ii  nova-compute-kvm   1:2014.2.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0   
 all  OpenStack Compute - compute node (KVM)

I have a 14 compute node deployment, my VIP percona leader was axed and
one of the compute services did not reconnect.  13 did, so clearly there
is retry logic already involved that is working in most cases.

Will attach full stack trace, The missing log entry that all the good
units have seems to be this:

2015-05-12 19:55:52.867 229965 ERROR nova.servicegroup.drivers.db [-]
Recovered model server connection!

** Affects: nova
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: cloud-installer landscape

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1454410

Title:
  Juno HA Deployment, percona on VIP, killed leader, compute did not
  reconnect

Status in OpenStack Compute (Nova):
  New

Bug description:
  ii  nova-common1:2014.2.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 
   all  OpenStack Compute - common files
  ii  nova-compute   1:2014.2.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 
   all  OpenStack Compute - compute node base
  ii  nova-compute-kvm   1:2014.2.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 
   all  OpenStack Compute - compute node (KVM)

  I have a 14 compute node deployment, my VIP percona leader was axed
  and one of the compute services did not reconnect.  13 did, so clearly
  there is retry logic already involved that is working in most cases.

  Will attach full stack trace, The missing log entry that all the good
  units have seems to be this:

  2015-05-12 19:55:52.867 229965 ERROR nova.servicegroup.drivers.db [-]
  Recovered model server connection!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1454410/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1438520] Re: cloud-init on vivid upgrade causes sigterm, which aborts 'runcmd' execution

2015-04-01 Thread David Britton
** Also affects: juju-core
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: juju-core

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438520

Title:
  cloud-init on vivid upgrade causes sigterm, which aborts 'runcmd'
  execution

Status in Init scripts for use on cloud images:
  New

Bug description:
  I used an openstack infrastructure with a vivid beta2 image.  End
  result, if there is cloud-init upgrade available, it installs and
  abort parts of the cloud-init execution.  (bad news for my user
  scripts!)  I'm not sure of all the fallout, but at least my 'runcmd'
  section was not executed (grep the logs for 'runcmd').

  From cloud-init-output.log:

  Preparing to unpack .../cryptsetup-bin_2%3a1.6.1-1ubuntu7_amd64.deb ...^M
  Unpacking cryptsetup-bin (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu7) over (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu5) ...^M
  Preparing to unpack .../cryptsetup_2%3a1.6.1-1ubuntu7_amd64.deb ...^M
  Unpacking cryptsetup (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu7) over (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu5) ...^M
  Preparing to unpack .../cloud-init_0.7.7~bzr1087-0ubuntu1_all.deb ...^M
  Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 running 'modules:final' at Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:09:42 
+. Up 848.15 seconds.
  Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 finished at Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:09:44 +. Datasource 
DataSourceOpenStack [net,ver=2].  Up 850.19 seconds

  From cloud-init.log:

  Mar 31 04:57:38 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Running command 
['eatmydata', 'apt-get', '--option=Dpkg::Options::=--force-confold', 
'--option=Dpkg::options::=--force-unsafe-io', '--assume-yes', '--quiet', 
'dist-upgrade'] with allowed return codes [0] (shell=False, capture=False)
  Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Cloud-init 0.7.7 received 
SIGTERM, exiting...#012  Filename: /usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012  
Function: _eintr_retry_call#012  Line number: 491#012Filename: 
/usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012Function: _try_wait#012Line number: 
1514#012  Filename: /usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012  Function: 
wait#012  Line number: 1566
  Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: apt-upgrade [eatmydata 
apt-get --option=Dpkg::Options::=--force-confold 
--option=Dpkg::options::=--force-unsafe-io --assume-yes --quiet dist-upgrade] 
took 722.766 seconds
  Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Reading from /proc/uptime 
(quiet=False)
  Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Read 12 bytes from 
/proc/uptime
  Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: cloud-init mode 'modules' 
took 761.227 seconds (761.23)
  Mar 31 05:09:42 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 
running 'modules:final' at Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:09:42 +. Up 848.15 seconds.
  Mar 31 05:09:44 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] stages.py[DEBUG]: Using distro class 

  Mar 31 05:09:44 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] stages.py[DEBUG]: Running module 
rightscale_userdata () 
with frequency once-per-instance


  I'll attach full cloud-init logs and the userdata.  I used the
  following command to boot the instance:

  nova boot --key-name dpb --user-data ~/test.txt --image
  fc7aedfd-f465-48b9-9fc6-c826f3a0e81b --flavor 2 vivid-test

  and the image is this:

  ubuntu-released/ubuntu-
  vivid-15.04-beta2-amd64-server-20150325-disk1.img

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1438520/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1438520] [NEW] cloud-init on vivid upgrade causes sigterm, which aborts 'runcmd' execution

2015-03-30 Thread David Britton
Public bug reported:

I used an openstack infrastructure with a vivid beta2 image.  End
result, if there is cloud-init upgrade available, it installs and abort
parts of the cloud-init execution.  (bad news for my user scripts!)  I'm
not sure of all the fallout, but at least my 'runcmd' section was not
executed (grep the logs for 'runcmd').

>From cloud-init-output.log:

Preparing to unpack .../cryptsetup-bin_2%3a1.6.1-1ubuntu7_amd64.deb ...^M
Unpacking cryptsetup-bin (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu7) over (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu5) ...^M
Preparing to unpack .../cryptsetup_2%3a1.6.1-1ubuntu7_amd64.deb ...^M
Unpacking cryptsetup (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu7) over (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu5) ...^M
Preparing to unpack .../cloud-init_0.7.7~bzr1087-0ubuntu1_all.deb ...^M
Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 running 'modules:final' at Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:09:42 +. 
Up 848.15 seconds.
Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 finished at Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:09:44 +. Datasource 
DataSourceOpenStack [net,ver=2].  Up 850.19 seconds

>From cloud-init.log:

Mar 31 04:57:38 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Running command 
['eatmydata', 'apt-get', '--option=Dpkg::Options::=--force-confold', 
'--option=Dpkg::options::=--force-unsafe-io', '--assume-yes', '--quiet', 
'dist-upgrade'] with allowed return codes [0] (shell=False, capture=False)
Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Cloud-init 0.7.7 received 
SIGTERM, exiting...#012  Filename: /usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012  
Function: _eintr_retry_call#012  Line number: 491#012Filename: 
/usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012Function: _try_wait#012Line number: 
1514#012  Filename: /usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012  Function: 
wait#012  Line number: 1566
Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: apt-upgrade [eatmydata 
apt-get --option=Dpkg::Options::=--force-confold 
--option=Dpkg::options::=--force-unsafe-io --assume-yes --quiet dist-upgrade] 
took 722.766 seconds
Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Reading from /proc/uptime 
(quiet=False)
Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Read 12 bytes from 
/proc/uptime
Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: cloud-init mode 'modules' 
took 761.227 seconds (761.23)
Mar 31 05:09:42 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 running 
'modules:final' at Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:09:42 +. Up 848.15 seconds.
Mar 31 05:09:44 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] stages.py[DEBUG]: Using distro class 
Mar 31 05:09:44 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] stages.py[DEBUG]: Running module 
rightscale_userdata () 
with frequency once-per-instance


I'll attach full cloud-init logs and the userdata.  I used the following
command to boot the instance:

nova boot --key-name dpb --user-data ~/test.txt --image
fc7aedfd-f465-48b9-9fc6-c826f3a0e81b --flavor 2 vivid-test

and the image is this:

ubuntu-released/ubuntu-vivid-15.04-beta2-amd64-server-20150325-disk1.img

** Affects: cloud-init
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: landscape

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438520

Title:
  cloud-init on vivid upgrade causes sigterm, which aborts 'runcmd'
  execution

Status in Init scripts for use on cloud images:
  New

Bug description:
  I used an openstack infrastructure with a vivid beta2 image.  End
  result, if there is cloud-init upgrade available, it installs and
  abort parts of the cloud-init execution.  (bad news for my user
  scripts!)  I'm not sure of all the fallout, but at least my 'runcmd'
  section was not executed (grep the logs for 'runcmd').

  From cloud-init-output.log:

  Preparing to unpack .../cryptsetup-bin_2%3a1.6.1-1ubuntu7_amd64.deb ...^M
  Unpacking cryptsetup-bin (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu7) over (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu5) ...^M
  Preparing to unpack .../cryptsetup_2%3a1.6.1-1ubuntu7_amd64.deb ...^M
  Unpacking cryptsetup (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu7) over (2:1.6.1-1ubuntu5) ...^M
  Preparing to unpack .../cloud-init_0.7.7~bzr1087-0ubuntu1_all.deb ...^M
  Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 running 'modules:final' at Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:09:42 
+. Up 848.15 seconds.
  Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 finished at Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:09:44 +. Datasource 
DataSourceOpenStack [net,ver=2].  Up 850.19 seconds

  From cloud-init.log:

  Mar 31 04:57:38 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Running command 
['eatmydata', 'apt-get', '--option=Dpkg::Options::=--force-confold', 
'--option=Dpkg::options::=--force-unsafe-io', '--assume-yes', '--quiet', 
'dist-upgrade'] with allowed return codes [0] (shell=False, capture=False)
  Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Cloud-init 0.7.7 received 
SIGTERM, exiting...#012  Filename: /usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012  
Function: _eintr_retry_call#012  Line number: 491#012Filename: 
/usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012Function: _try_wait#012Line number: 
1514#012  Filename: /usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py#012  Function: 
wait#012  Line number: 1566
  Mar 31 05:09:41 ubuntu 

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1353008] Re: MAAS Provider: LXC did not get DHCP address, stuck in "pending"

2014-08-25 Thread David Britton
** Also affects: cloud-init
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1353008

Title:
  MAAS Provider: LXC did not get DHCP address, stuck in "pending"

Status in Init scripts for use on cloud images:
  New
Status in juju-core:
  Triaged
Status in juju-core 1.20 series:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Note, that after I went onto the system, it *did* have an IP address.

    0/lxc/3:
  agent-state: pending
  instance-id: juju-machine-0-lxc-3
  series: trusty
  hardware: arch=amd64

  cloud-init-output.log snip:

  Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 running 'init' at Mon, 04 Aug 2014 23:57:12 +. Up 
572.29 seconds.
  ci-info: +++Net device info+++
  ci-info: ++--+---+---+---+
  ci-info: | Device |  Up  |  Address  |Mask   | Hw-Address|
  ci-info: ++--+---+---+---+
  ci-info: |   lo   | True | 127.0.0.1 | 255.0.0.0 | . |
  ci-info: |  eth0  | True | . | . | 00:16:3e:34:aa:57 |
  ci-info: ++--+---+---+---+
  ci-info: !!!Route info 
failed
  Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 running 'modules:config' at Mon, 04 Aug 2014 23:57:12 
+. Up 572.99 seconds.
  Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 running 'modules:final' at Mon, 04 Aug 2014 23:57:14 
+. Up 574.42 seconds.
  Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 finished at Mon, 04 Aug 2014 23:57:14 +. Datasource 
DataSourceNoCloudNet [seed=/var/lib/cloud/seed/nocloud-net][dsmode=net].  Up 
574.54 seconds

  syslog on system, showing DHCPACK 1 second later:

  root@juju-machine-0-lxc-3:/home/ubuntu# grep DHCP /var/log/syslog
  Aug  4 23:57:13 juju-machine-0-lxc-3 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 10.96.3.173 on 
eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 (xid=0x1687c544)
  Aug  4 23:57:13 juju-machine-0-lxc-3 dhclient: DHCPOFFER of 10.96.3.173 from 
10.96.0.10
  Aug  4 23:57:13 juju-machine-0-lxc-3 dhclient: DHCPACK of 10.96.3.173 from 
10.96.0.10
  Aug  5 05:28:15 juju-machine-0-lxc-3 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 10.96.3.173 on 
eth0 to 10.96.0.10 port 67 (xid=0x1687c544)
  Aug  5 05:28:15 juju-machine-0-lxc-3 dhclient: DHCPACK of 10.96.3.173 from 
10.96.0.10
  Aug  5 11:15:00 juju-machine-0-lxc-3 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 10.96.3.173 on 
eth0 to 10.96.0.10 port 67 (xid=0x1687c544)
  Aug  5 11:15:00 juju-machine-0-lxc-3 dhclient: DHCPACK of 10.96.3.173 from 
10.96.0.10

  It appears in every case, cloud-init init-local has failed very early
  visible in juju logs /var/lib/juju/containers//console.log:

  Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/cloud-init", line 618, in 
  sys.exit(main())
File "/usr/bin/cloud-init", line 614, in main
  get_uptime=True, func=functor, args=(name, args))
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cloudinit/util.py", line 1875, in 
log_time
  ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/bin/cloud-init", line 491, in status_wrapper
  force=True)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cloudinit/util.py", line 1402, in 
sym_link
  os.symlink(source, link)
  OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1353008/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp