[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7919) Split timelineservice-hbase module to make YARN-7346 easier

2018-02-16 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16367604#comment-16367604
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on YARN-7919:
--

bq. In this case, hbase depends on jcodings-1.0-18 (directly) and 
jcodings-1.0.13 (transitively from joni). It is probably not a real problem 
given both versions are in the same 1.0.x release line. But hadoop always takes 
the conservative approach. Is there any downside to make hbase-client depend on 
the exactly same version, 1.0.13, of joni? It is more of a nice-to-have 
dependency hygiene.

Hrm, this is the part that confuses me. HBase defining a dependency on 
jcoding-1.0.18 should override the transitive 1.0.13 dependency and prevent 
YARN from seeing it. Is YARN setting a direct dependency on the same version of 
jcodings for some reason?

> Split timelineservice-hbase module to make YARN-7346 easier
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7919
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: timelineservice
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7919.00.patch, YARN-7919.01.patch, 
> YARN-7919.02.patch, YARN-7919.03.patch, YARN-7919.04.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7919) Split timelineservice-hbase module to make YARN-7346 easier

2018-02-16 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16367571#comment-16367571
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on YARN-7919:
--

I'm struggling here. I don't understand what the problem is. HBase-2.0 depends 
on joni 2.1.11 and jcodings 1.0.18.

The build failure is due to the enforcer-plugin you configured in YARN.

> Split timelineservice-hbase module to make YARN-7346 easier
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-7919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7919
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: timelineservice
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-7919.00.patch, YARN-7919.01.patch, 
> YARN-7919.02.patch, YARN-7919.03.patch, YARN-7919.04.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2683) document registry config options

2014-10-16 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14174648#comment-14174648
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on YARN-2683:
--

I made some grammar/punctuation changes in addition to some clarity on the 
ZooKeeper paths that [~ste...@apache.org] has [pulled into his feature 
branch|https://github.com/steveloughran/hadoop-trunk/pull/4] 

 document registry config options
 

 Key: YARN-2683
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2683
 Project: Hadoop YARN
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Components: api, resourcemanager
Affects Versions: 2.6.0
Reporter: Steve Loughran
Assignee: Steve Loughran
 Attachments: YARN-2683-001.patch

   Original Estimate: 1h
  Remaining Estimate: 1h

 Add to {{yarn-site}} a page on registry configuration parameters



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1304) Error starting AM: org.apache.hadoop.security.token.TokenIdentifier: Error reading configuration file

2014-04-10 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13965966#comment-13965966
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on YARN-1304:
--

Just ran into this one myself. In my case, I had inadvertently updated some 
hadoop jars after the NM was already running. When an MR went to look at the 
classpath, some of the jars weren't on local filesystem anymore, and it bailed 
out.

Restarting the NM and verifying that all hadoop jars were present and readable 
were sufficient for me to work around this. Probably worthwhile to close this 
out without any more info.

 Error starting AM: org.apache.hadoop.security.token.TokenIdentifier: Error 
 reading configuration file
 -

 Key: YARN-1304
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1304
 Project: Hadoop YARN
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2.0
Reporter: Bikas Saha





--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)


[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1754) Container process is not really killed

2014-02-23 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13910012#comment-13910012
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on YARN-1754:
--

This is expected as OSX does not contain a {{setsid}} binary. If you make sure 
a binary available, you should see containers freed on OSX.

Also see: YARN-76

 Container process is not really killed
 --

 Key: YARN-1754
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1754
 Project: Hadoop YARN
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: nodemanager
Affects Versions: 2.2.0
 Environment: Mac
Reporter: Jeff Zhang

 I test the following distributed shell example on my mac:
 hadoop jar 
 share/hadoop/yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell-2.2.0.jar 
 -appname shell -jar 
 share/hadoop/yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications-distributedshell-2.2.0.jar 
 -shell_command=sleep -shell_args=10 -num_containers=1
 And it will start 2 process for one container, one is the shell process, 
 another is the real command I execute ( here is sleep 10). 
 And then I kill this application by running command yarn application -kill 
 app_id
 it will kill the shell process, but won't kill the real command process. The 
 reason is that yarn use kill command to kill process, but it won't kill its 
 child process. use pkill could resolve this issue.
 IMHO, it is a very important case which will make the resource usage 
 inconsistency, and have potential security problem. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)