[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-9005) FairScheduler maybe preempt the AM container

2018-11-10 Thread Wanqiang Ji (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16682251#comment-16682251
 ] 

Wanqiang Ji edited comment on YARN-9005 at 11/10/18 8:29 AM:
-

Thanks [~yufeigu] provides the original design and discussion.

I updated 002 patch to elevate the performance for identifyContainersToPreempt. 
Please help to review, thx~


was (Author: jiwq):
Thanks [~yufeigu] provides the original design and discussion.

I update 002 patch to elevate the performance for identifyContainersToPreempt. 
Please help to review, thx~

> FairScheduler maybe preempt the AM container
> 
>
> Key: YARN-9005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9005
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: fairscheduler, scheduler preemption
>Reporter: Wanqiang Ji
>Assignee: Wanqiang Ji
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9005.001.patch, YARN-9005.002.patch
>
>
> In the worst case, FS preempt the AM container. Due to 
> FSPreemptionThread#identifyContainersToPreempt return value contains AM 
> container.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-9005) FairScheduler maybe preempt the AM container

2018-11-09 Thread Wanqiang Ji (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16682199#comment-16682199
 ] 

Wanqiang Ji edited comment on YARN-9005 at 11/10/18 4:30 AM:
-

Hi [~cheersyang], [~wilfreds] Happy Weekend! Can you help to review this?

This patch doesn't need new UTs.

I tested locally it can work correctly, but I don't know why UT failure. Anyone 
tracking it?


was (Author: jiwq):
Hi [~cheersyang], Happy Weekend! Can you help to review this?

This patch doesn't need new UTs.

I tested locally it can work correctly, but I don't know why UT failure. Anyone 
tracking it?

> FairScheduler maybe preempt the AM container
> 
>
> Key: YARN-9005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9005
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Wanqiang Ji
>Assignee: Wanqiang Ji
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9005.001.patch
>
>
> In the worst case, FS preempt the AM container. Due to 
> FSPreemptionThread#identifyContainersToPreempt return value contains AM 
> container.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org