Yuqi Wang created YARN-7872:
-------------------------------

             Summary: labeled node cannot be used to satisfy locality specified 
request
                 Key: YARN-7872
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7872
             Project: Hadoop YARN
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: capacity scheduler, capacityscheduler, resourcemanager
    Affects Versions: 2.7.2
            Reporter: Yuqi Wang
            Assignee: Yuqi Wang
             Fix For: 2.7.2, 2.8.0


labeled node (i.e. node with 'not empty' node label) cannot be used to satisfy 
locality specified request (i.e. container request with 'not ANY' resource name 
and the relax locality is false).

For example:

The node with available resource:

[Resource: [MemoryMB: [100] CpuNumber: [12]] {color:#14892c}NodeLabel: 
[persistent]{color} {color:#f79232}HostName: \{SRG}{color} RackName: 
\{/default-rack}]

The container request:
[Priority: [1] Resource: [MemoryMB: [1] CpuNumber: [1]] 
{color:#14892c}NodeLabel: [null]{color} {color:#f79232}HostNames: \{SRG}{color} 
RackNames: {} {color:#59afe1}RelaxLocality: [false]{color}]

 

Current RM capacity scheduler's behaiour is:
The node cannot allocate container for the request because of the node label 
not matched in the leaf queue assign container.

However, node locality and node label should be two orthogonal dimensions to 
select candidate nodes for container request. And the node label matching 
should only be executed for container request with ANY resource name, since 
only this kind of container request is allowed to have 'not empty' node label.

So, for container request with 'not ANY' resource name (besides, it should not 
have node label), we should use resource name to match with the node instead of 
node label to match with the node. And it should be safe, since the node which 
is not accessible for the queue will not be sent in the leaf queue.

Attachment is the fix according to this principle, please help to review.

Without it, we cannot use locality to request container within these labeled 
nodes.

If the fix is acceptable, we should also recheck whether the same issue happens 
in trunk.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to