[jira] [Resolved] (YARN-1688) Rethinking about POJO Classes

2015-05-01 Thread Zhijie Shen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Zhijie Shen resolved YARN-1688.
---
Resolution: Fixed

YARN-3539 will state timeline v1 APIs stable. We won't change v1 pojo classes.

> Rethinking about POJO Classes
> -
>
> Key: YARN-1688
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1688
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Zhijie Shen
>
> We need to think about how the POJO classes evolve. Should we back up them 
> with proto and others.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Resolved] (YARN-1688) Rethinking about POJO Classes

2015-05-01 Thread Zhijie Shen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Zhijie Shen resolved YARN-1688.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix

> Rethinking about POJO Classes
> -
>
> Key: YARN-1688
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1688
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>Assignee: Zhijie Shen
>
> We need to think about how the POJO classes evolve. Should we back up them 
> with proto and others.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)