[jira] [Updated] (YARN-6831) Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler

2024-01-04 Thread Shilun Fan (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shilun Fan updated YARN-6831:
-
Target Version/s: 3.5.0  (was: 3.4.0)

> Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler 
> --
>
> Key: YARN-6831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: nodemanager
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>Priority: Major
>
> While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
> ContainerScheduler
> *Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a 
> different tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
> *ContainerScheduler
>   ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
>   ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
> runningOpportunistic?
>   ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
> about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
> here?
>   ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
> *OpportunisticContainersStatus
>   ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
> we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
>   ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
> that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
>   ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
> We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 
> moving forward to unblock oversubscription work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (YARN-6831) Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler

2020-04-09 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Brahma Reddy Battula updated YARN-6831:
---
Target Version/s: 3.4.0  (was: 3.3.0)

Bulk update: moved all 3.3.0 non-blocker issues, please move back if it is a 
blocker.

> Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler 
> --
>
> Key: YARN-6831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: nodemanager
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>Priority: Major
>
> While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
> ContainerScheduler
> *Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a 
> different tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
> *ContainerScheduler
>   ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
>   ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
> runningOpportunistic?
>   ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
> about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
> here?
>   ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
> *OpportunisticContainersStatus
>   ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
> we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
>   ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
> that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
>   ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
> We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 
> moving forward to unblock oversubscription work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (YARN-6831) Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler

2018-11-16 Thread Sunil Govindan (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sunil Govindan updated YARN-6831:
-
Target Version/s: 3.3.0  (was: 3.2.0)

Bulk update: moved all 3.2.0 non-blocker issues, please move back if it is a 
blocker.

> Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler 
> --
>
> Key: YARN-6831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: nodemanager
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>Priority: Major
>
> While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
> ContainerScheduler
> *Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a 
> different tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
> *ContainerScheduler
>   ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
>   ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
> runningOpportunistic?
>   ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
> about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
> here?
>   ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
> *OpportunisticContainersStatus
>   ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
> we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
>   ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
> that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
>   ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
> We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 
> moving forward to unblock oversubscription work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (YARN-6831) Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler

2017-07-17 Thread Haibo Chen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Haibo Chen updated YARN-6831:
-
Description: 
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

*Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.

*ContainerScheduler
  ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
  ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
  ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
  ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary

#OpportunisticContainersStatus
  ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
  ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
  ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.

  was:
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

#Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.

#ContainerScheduler
  ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
  ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
  ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
  ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary

#OpportunisticContainersStatus
  ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
  ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
  ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.


> Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler 
> --
>
> Key: YARN-6831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: nodemanager
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>
> While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
> ContainerScheduler
> *Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a 
> different tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
> *ContainerScheduler
>   ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
>   ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
> runningOpportunistic?
>   ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
> about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
> here?
>   ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
> #OpportunisticContainersStatus
>   ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
> we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
>   ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
> that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
>   ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
> We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 
> moving forward to unblock oversubscription work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (YARN-6831) Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler

2017-07-17 Thread Haibo Chen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Haibo Chen updated YARN-6831:
-
Description: 
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

*Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.

*ContainerScheduler
  ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
  ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
  ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
  ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary

*OpportunisticContainersStatus
  ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
  ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
  ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.

  was:
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

*Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.

*ContainerScheduler
  ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
  ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
  ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
  ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary

#OpportunisticContainersStatus
  ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
  ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
  ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.


> Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler 
> --
>
> Key: YARN-6831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: nodemanager
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>
> While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
> ContainerScheduler
> *Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a 
> different tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
> *ContainerScheduler
>   ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
>   ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
> runningOpportunistic?
>   ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
> about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
> here?
>   ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
> *OpportunisticContainersStatus
>   ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
> we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
>   ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
> that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
>   ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
> We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 
> moving forward to unblock oversubscription work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (YARN-6831) Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler

2017-07-17 Thread Haibo Chen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Haibo Chen updated YARN-6831:
-
Description: 
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

#Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.

#ContainerScheduler
  ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
  ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
  ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
  ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary

#OpportunisticContainersStatus
  ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
  ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
  ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.

  was:
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

#Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
#ContainerScheduler
##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
#OpportunisticContainersStatus
##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, we 
should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.


> Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler 
> --
>
> Key: YARN-6831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: nodemanager
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>
> While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
> ContainerScheduler
> #Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a 
> different tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
> #ContainerScheduler
>   ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
>   ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
> runningOpportunistic?
>   ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
> about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
> here?
>   ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
> #OpportunisticContainersStatus
>   ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
> we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
>   ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
> that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
>   ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
> We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 
> moving forward to unblock oversubscription work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (YARN-6831) Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler

2017-07-17 Thread Haibo Chen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Haibo Chen updated YARN-6831:
-
Description: 
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

#Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
#ContainerScheduler
##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
#OpportunisticContainersStatus
##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, we 
should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.

  was:
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

"
#Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
#ContainerScheduler
##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
#OpportunisticContainersStatus
##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, we 
should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
"

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.


> Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler 
> --
>
> Key: YARN-6831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: nodemanager
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>
> While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
> ContainerScheduler
> #Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a 
> different tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
> #ContainerScheduler
> ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
> ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
> runningOpportunistic?
> ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
> about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
> here?
> ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
> #OpportunisticContainersStatus
> ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
> we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
> ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
> that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
> ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
> We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 
> moving forward to unblock oversubscription work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (YARN-6831) Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler

2017-07-17 Thread Haibo Chen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Haibo Chen updated YARN-6831:
-
Description: 
While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
ContainerScheduler

"
#Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a different 
tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
#ContainerScheduler
##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
runningOpportunistic?
##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
here?
##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
#OpportunisticContainersStatus
##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, we 
should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
"

We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 moving 
forward to unblock oversubscription work.

> Miscellaneous refactoring changes of ContainScheduler 
> --
>
> Key: YARN-6831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6831
> Project: Hadoop YARN
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: nodemanager
>Reporter: Haibo Chen
>Assignee: Haibo Chen
>
> While reviewing YARN-6706, Karthik pointed out a few issues for improvment in 
> ContainerScheduler
> "
> #Make ResourceUtilizationTracker pluggable. That way, we could use a 
> different tracker when oversubscription is enabled.
> #ContainerScheduler
> ##Why do we need maxOppQueueLength given queuingLimit?
> ##Is there value in splitting runningContainers into runningGuaranteed and 
> runningOpportunistic?
> ##getOpportunisticContainersStatus method implementation feels awkward. How 
> about capturing the state in the field here, and have metrics etc. pull from 
> here?
> ##startContainersFromQueue: Local variable resourcesAvailable is unnecessary
> #OpportunisticContainersStatus
> ##Let us clearly differentiate between allocated, used and utilized. Maybe, 
> we should rename current Used methods to Allocated?
> ##I prefer either full name Opportunistic (in method) or Opp (shortest name 
> that makes sense). Opport is neither short nor fully descriptive.
> ##Have we considered folding ContainerQueuingLimit class into this?
> "
> We decided to move the issues into this follow up jira to keep YARN-6706 
> moving forward to unblock oversubscription work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org