Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python
Just attempting to revive this dead horse again... Anyone made any proress here? Since cross-compiling turned out to be really really painful, I tried if compiling on the board would be an option. No such luck, apparently the Fortran compiler isn't being crosscompiled either. On 26-01-19 20:01, Philip Balister wrote: > Sounds like we need a layer for packages that needs fortran enabled and > collect out work there. > > Philip > > On 01/24/2019 05:31 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: >> +1 >> >> Got lapack to compile, but no such luck with any "blas" package (like >> openblas). And that's a requirement for octave, which was what I was aiming >> at. >> >> I'll share some recipes, tomorrow or so (today is stuffed with other work). >> >> >> On 23-01-19 22:39, Philip Balister wrote: >>> I care :) >>> >>> On 01/23/2019 04:28 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote: On 1/23/19 2:54 PM, Smith, Virgil (US) wrote: > Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related > libraries? People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems with blas and atlas: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-March/thread.html#40348 I'd say that there is interest. I CCed Peter who started one of the threads and BCCed 5 other people who seemed to be interested since I didn't want to drag them all into the thread. > > Further and more importantly, is having a maintainer for (recipes for) > those libraries a priority for the active members of the Project? > (i.e. does interest rise above the general welcoming of participants > to periodically asking “Hey has anyone put out a call to fill this > slot?” if/when the slot is vacant). It's always nice to have a maintainer but community members sometimes keep recipes up to date even if they aren't direct users. > > BTW: If this is the wrong list for this query, please let me know. It a reasonable list for general discussion. If you get to a point where patches are being submitted, it should probably go to another list such as: > > Why? We are trying to gauge community interest before making long > term plans. > > We would like to know if this horse is at all likely to have > healthcare before betting on it (without sacrificing other patients to > obtain the proper veterinary degree and keep up practice to treat it > ourselves). heh. Thanks! ../Randy > > NOTE: I see from the RRS emails that Derek Straka is currently > maintaining the python-numpy recipe. THANK YOU! > > > > > Notice to recipient: This email is meant for only the intended > recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged > by law, subject to export control restrictions or that otherwise > contains proprietary information. If you receive this email by > mistake, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and > then destroy it and do not review, disclose, copy or distribute it. > Thank you in advance for your cooperation. > >> -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python
Sounds like we need a layer for packages that needs fortran enabled and collect out work there. Philip On 01/24/2019 05:31 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > +1 > > Got lapack to compile, but no such luck with any "blas" package (like > openblas). And that's a requirement for octave, which was what I was aiming > at. > > I'll share some recipes, tomorrow or so (today is stuffed with other work). > > > On 23-01-19 22:39, Philip Balister wrote: >> I care :) >> >> On 01/23/2019 04:28 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote: >>> On 1/23/19 2:54 PM, Smith, Virgil (US) wrote: Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related libraries? >>> >>> People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems >>> with blas and atlas: >>> >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-March/thread.html#40348 >>> >>> I'd say that there is interest. >>> I CCed Peter who started one of the threads >>> and BCCed 5 other people who seemed to be interested >>> since I didn't want to drag them all into the thread. >>> >>> Further and more importantly, is having a maintainer for (recipes for) those libraries a priority for the active members of the Project? (i.e. does interest rise above the general welcoming of participants to periodically asking “Hey has anyone put out a call to fill this slot?” if/when the slot is vacant). >>> >>> It's always nice to have a maintainer but community members sometimes >>> keep recipes up to date even if they aren't direct users. >>> BTW: If this is the wrong list for this query, please let me know. >>> >>> It a reasonable list for general discussion. >>> If you get to a point where patches are being submitted, >>> it should probably go to another list such as: >>> Why? We are trying to gauge community interest before making long term plans. We would like to know if this horse is at all likely to have healthcare before betting on it (without sacrificing other patients to obtain the proper veterinary degree and keep up practice to treat it ourselves). >>> heh. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> ../Randy >>> NOTE: I see from the RRS emails that Derek Straka is currently maintaining the python-numpy recipe. THANK YOU! Notice to recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law, subject to export control restrictions or that otherwise contains proprietary information. If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and then destroy it and do not review, disclose, copy or distribute it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. >>> >>> > -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python
+1 Got lapack to compile, but no such luck with any "blas" package (like openblas). And that's a requirement for octave, which was what I was aiming at. I'll share some recipes, tomorrow or so (today is stuffed with other work). On 23-01-19 22:39, Philip Balister wrote: > I care :) > > On 01/23/2019 04:28 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote: >> On 1/23/19 2:54 PM, Smith, Virgil (US) wrote: >>> Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related >>> libraries? >> >> People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems >> with blas and atlas: >> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-March/thread.html#40348 >> >> I'd say that there is interest. >> I CCed Peter who started one of the threads >> and BCCed 5 other people who seemed to be interested >> since I didn't want to drag them all into the thread. >> >> >>> >>> Further and more importantly, is having a maintainer for (recipes for) >>> those libraries a priority for the active members of the Project? >>> (i.e. does interest rise above the general welcoming of participants >>> to periodically asking “Hey has anyone put out a call to fill this >>> slot?” if/when the slot is vacant). >> >> It's always nice to have a maintainer but community members sometimes >> keep recipes up to date even if they aren't direct users. >> >>> >>> BTW: If this is the wrong list for this query, please let me know. >> >> It a reasonable list for general discussion. >> If you get to a point where patches are being submitted, >> it should probably go to another list such as: >> >>> >>> Why? We are trying to gauge community interest before making long >>> term plans. >>> >>> We would like to know if this horse is at all likely to have >>> healthcare before betting on it (without sacrificing other patients to >>> obtain the proper veterinary degree and keep up practice to treat it >>> ourselves). >> heh. >> >> Thanks! >> ../Randy >> >>> >>> NOTE: I see from the RRS emails that Derek Straka is currently >>> maintaining the python-numpy recipe. THANK YOU! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Notice to recipient: This email is meant for only the intended >>> recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged >>> by law, subject to export control restrictions or that otherwise >>> contains proprietary information. If you receive this email by >>> mistake, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and >>> then destroy it and do not review, disclose, copy or distribute it. >>> Thank you in advance for your cooperation. >>> >> >> -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python
Discussing only the question of making a SciPy recipe today: > > Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related > > libraries? > > People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems with > blas and atlas: > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-March/thread.html#40348 > # Randy MacLeod > Wind River Linux Thanks Randy, my own brief foray landed on the following thread as the most promising lead: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-March/040450.html I didn't have any success with those pieces, but the telling point in that discussion are the patches to numpy (numpy.distutils). When you dig into SciPy's installation instructions and therefore its setup.py file, you find that it is using code packaged into the numpy library as effectively its own configure/build toolchain. It is full of Linux vs Windows vs MacOS distinctions and path probing for recognized compilers/tools. Patching that into something that can be tuned for cross compiling was beyond my allowances for an "investigative effort". I did manage to *compile* OpenBlas just by blending its standard build instructions (pure make based) with oe_runmake, a libgfortran DEPENDS/RDEPENDS, (FORTRAN_forcevariable = ",fortran" in local.conf), and some regex mapping from TUNE_FEATURES to the defines used by OpenBlas. If I ever find out it actually worked (once), I'll post it in case someone has bandwidth to add checks for mapping other MACHINE/TUNE... values to OpenBlas "TargetList.txt" entries, testing that it works in newer Yocto releases (I'm using Sumo), and add update-alternatives integration. Notice to recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law, subject to export control restrictions or that otherwise contains proprietary information. If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and then destroy it and do not review, disclose, copy or distribute it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python
On 1/23/19 4:28 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote: It a reasonable list for general discussion. If you get to a point where patches are being submitted, it should probably go to another list such as: oops... such as the meta-openembedded list: openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org or whatever list the package(s) land in. -- # Randy MacLeod # Wind River Linux -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python
I care :) On 01/23/2019 04:28 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote: > On 1/23/19 2:54 PM, Smith, Virgil (US) wrote: >> Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related >> libraries? > > People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems > with blas and atlas: > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-March/thread.html#40348 > > I'd say that there is interest. > I CCed Peter who started one of the threads > and BCCed 5 other people who seemed to be interested > since I didn't want to drag them all into the thread. > > >> >> Further and more importantly, is having a maintainer for (recipes for) >> those libraries a priority for the active members of the Project? >> (i.e. does interest rise above the general welcoming of participants >> to periodically asking “Hey has anyone put out a call to fill this >> slot?” if/when the slot is vacant). > > It's always nice to have a maintainer but community members sometimes > keep recipes up to date even if they aren't direct users. > >> >> BTW: If this is the wrong list for this query, please let me know. > > It a reasonable list for general discussion. > If you get to a point where patches are being submitted, > it should probably go to another list such as: > >> >> Why? We are trying to gauge community interest before making long >> term plans. >> >> We would like to know if this horse is at all likely to have >> healthcare before betting on it (without sacrificing other patients to >> obtain the proper veterinary degree and keep up practice to treat it >> ourselves). > heh. > > Thanks! > ../Randy > >> >> NOTE: I see from the RRS emails that Derek Straka is currently >> maintaining the python-numpy recipe. THANK YOU! >> >> >> >> >> Notice to recipient: This email is meant for only the intended >> recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged >> by law, subject to export control restrictions or that otherwise >> contains proprietary information. If you receive this email by >> mistake, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and >> then destroy it and do not review, disclose, copy or distribute it. >> Thank you in advance for your cooperation. >> > > -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python
On 1/23/19 2:54 PM, Smith, Virgil (US) wrote: Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related libraries? People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems with blas and atlas: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-March/thread.html#40348 I'd say that there is interest. I CCed Peter who started one of the threads and BCCed 5 other people who seemed to be interested since I didn't want to drag them all into the thread. Further and more importantly, is having a maintainer for (recipes for) those libraries a priority for the active members of the Project? (i.e. does interest rise above the general welcoming of participants to periodically asking “Hey has anyone put out a call to fill this slot?” if/when the slot is vacant). It's always nice to have a maintainer but community members sometimes keep recipes up to date even if they aren't direct users. BTW: If this is the wrong list for this query, please let me know. It a reasonable list for general discussion. If you get to a point where patches are being submitted, it should probably go to another list such as: Why? We are trying to gauge community interest before making long term plans. We would like to know if this horse is at all likely to have healthcare before betting on it (without sacrificing other patients to obtain the proper veterinary degree and keep up practice to treat it ourselves). heh. Thanks! ../Randy NOTE: I see from the RRS emails that Derek Straka is currently maintaining the python-numpy recipe. THANK YOU! Notice to recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law, subject to export control restrictions or that otherwise contains proprietary information. If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and then destroy it and do not review, disclose, copy or distribute it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. -- # Randy MacLeod # Wind River Linux -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
[yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python
Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related libraries? Further and more importantly, is having a maintainer for (recipes for) those libraries a priority for the active members of the Project? (i.e. does interest rise above the general welcoming of participants to periodically asking "Hey has anyone put out a call to fill this slot?" if/when the slot is vacant). BTW: If this is the wrong list for this query, please let me know. Why? We are trying to gauge community interest before making long term plans. We would like to know if this horse is at all likely to have healthcare before betting on it (without sacrificing other patients to obtain the proper veterinary degree and keep up practice to treat it ourselves). NOTE: I see from the RRS emails that Derek Straka is currently maintaining the python-numpy recipe. THANK YOU! Notice to recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law, subject to export control restrictions or that otherwise contains proprietary information. If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and then destroy it and do not review, disclose, copy or distribute it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
