Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not
showing up here.
bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep IMAGE_INSTALL=
# MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL=
# IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL}
IMAGE_INSTALL=task-core-boot task-base-extended
I will rebuild with rttests and send the output.
Hi Kishore,
Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead?
Thanks,
Darren
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Can you report the output of:
$ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep ^IMAGE_INSTALL=
Thanks,
Darren
On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests for sugarbay.
It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests
Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
--
Darren
Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart
[mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
and it fails for the do_rootfs .
FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
kernel:
Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
using the following commits:
poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
you?
I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
if I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Darren
Tom
Attached is the build log.
Could you please let me know what went wrong?
Thanks
Kishore.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Hi Darren,
With the below Tom's commit IDs, the build was success and I am moving ahead
with this.
I am not blocked. I was also able to build and boot the Crystalforest BSP.
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:42 AM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not
showing up here.
bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep IMAGE_INSTALL=
# MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL=
# IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL}
IMAGE_INSTALL=task-core-boot task-base-extended
I will rebuild with rttests and send the output.
Hi Kishore,
Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead?
Thanks,
Darren
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Can you report the output of:
$ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep ^IMAGE_INSTALL=
Thanks,
Darren
On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests for sugarbay.
It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests
Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
--
Darren
Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart
[mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
and it fails for the do_rootfs .
FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
kernel:
Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
using the following commits:
poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
you?
I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
if I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Darren
Tom
Attached is the build log.
Could you please let me know what went wrong?
Thanks
Kishore.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 08/31/2011 04:49 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Hi, I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs . Attached is the build log. Could you please let me know what went wrong? Did you save a log of the build itself by any chance? It seems strange that you would have this dependencies are not being met. Sau! Thanks Kishore. ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Hi, I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs . FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel: Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux using the following commits: poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you? I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if I can reproduce the issue. Thanks, Darren Tom Attached is the build log. Could you please let me know what went wrong? Thanks Kishore. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests for sugarbay. It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Hi, I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs . FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel: Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux using the following commits: poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you? I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if I can reproduce the issue. Thanks, Darren Tom Attached is the build log. Could you please let me know what went wrong? Thanks Kishore. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests for sugarbay. It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... -- Darren Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Hi, I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs . FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel: Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux using the following commits: poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you? I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if I can reproduce the issue. Thanks, Darren Tom Attached is the build log. Could you please let me know what went wrong? Thanks Kishore. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests for sugarbay. It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... -- Darren Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Hi, I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs . FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel: Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux using the following commits: poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you? I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if I can reproduce the issue. Thanks, Darren Tom Attached is the build log. Could you please let me know what went wrong? Thanks Kishore. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Can you report the output of: $ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep ^IMAGE_INSTALL= Thanks, Darren On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests for sugarbay. It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... -- Darren Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Hi, I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs . FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel: Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux using the following commits: poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you? I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if I can reproduce the issue. Thanks, Darren Tom Attached is the build log. Could you please let me know what went wrong? Thanks Kishore. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing
up here.
bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep IMAGE_INSTALL=
# MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL=
# IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL}
IMAGE_INSTALL=task-core-boot task-base-extended
I will rebuild with rttests and send the output.
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Can you report the output of:
$ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep ^IMAGE_INSTALL=
Thanks,
Darren
On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
Thanks
Kishore.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests for sugarbay.
It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += rttests
Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
--
Darren
Thanks Kishore. -Original Message- From: Darren Hart
[mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
and it fails for the do_rootfs .
FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
kernel:
Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
using the following commits:
poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
you?
I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
if I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Darren
Tom
Attached is the build log.
Could you please let me know what went wrong?
Thanks
Kishore.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
