Re: [zeromq-dev] Alternatives to rfc.zeromq.org

2023-11-26 Thread Trevor Bernard
> I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the same 
> style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published in that 
> repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable.

The RFC repository follows the C4 process. Maintainers aren't supposed
to pass value judgments on correct patches. If they disagree they
should follow up with their own patches.

On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 8:33 AM Justus Ranvier  wrote:
>
> Thank you. Hugo looks like a really great tool.
>
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 12:52 AM Kevin Sapper  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Justus,
>> it's build with hugo and hosted on Netlify.
>>
>> //Kevin
>>
>> Justus Ranvier  schrieb am Sa., 25. Nov. 2023, 
>> 03:15:
>>>
>>> I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the 
>>> same style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published in 
>>> that repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable.
>>>
>>> Can anyone shed some light on what software is used to render that site?
>>>
>>> ___
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>> ___
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> ___
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


Re: [zeromq-dev] Alternatives to rfc.zeromq.org

2023-11-26 Thread Justus Ranvier
Thank you. Hugo looks like a really great tool.

On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 12:52 AM Kevin Sapper 
wrote:

> Hi Justus,
> it's build with hugo and hosted on Netlify.
>
> //Kevin
>
> Justus Ranvier  schrieb am Sa., 25. Nov. 2023,
> 03:15:
>
>> I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the
>> same style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published
>> in that repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable.
>>
>> Can anyone shed some light on what software is used to render that site?
>>
>> ___
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
> ___
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


Re: [zeromq-dev] Alternatives to rfc.zeromq.org

2023-11-24 Thread Kevin Sapper
Hi Justus,
it's build with hugo and hosted on Netlify.

//Kevin

Justus Ranvier  schrieb am Sa., 25. Nov. 2023,
03:15:

> I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the
> same style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published in
> that repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable.
>
> Can anyone shed some light on what software is used to render that site?
>
> ___
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


[zeromq-dev] Alternatives to rfc.zeromq.org

2023-11-24 Thread Justus Ranvier
I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the
same style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published in
that repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable.

Can anyone shed some light on what software is used to render that site?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev