Re: [zfs-discuss] fmadm faulty not showing faulty/offline disks?
On 2/16/11 9:58 PM, Krunal Desai wrote: When I try to do a SMART status read (more than just a simple identify), looks like the 1068E drops the drive for a little bit. I bought the Intel-branded LSI SAS3081E: Current active firmware version is 0120 (1.32.00) Firmware image's version is MPTFW-01.32.00.00-IT LSI Logic x86 BIOS image's version is MPTBIOS-6.34.00.00 (2010.12.07) ... Fault management records some transport errors followed by recovery. Any ideas? Disks are ST32000542AS. Please give the _exact_ command you are running. I see the same thing, but only if I tray and retrieve some of the extended info (-x...). I don't see it with -a. -- Carson ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] fmadm faulty not showing faulty/offline disks?
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Carson Gaspar car...@taltos.org wrote: Please give the _exact_ command you are running. I see the same thing, but only if I tray and retrieve some of the extended info (-x...). I don't see it with -a. Sure, here it is (apologies in advance if GMail applies its forced wrapping): movax@megatron:~/downloads# smartctl -a -d sat /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0 smartctl 5.40 2010-10-16 r3189 [i386-pc-solaris2.11] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: Seagate Barracuda LP Device Model: ST32000542AS Serial Number:redacted Firmware Version: CC34 User Capacity:2,000,398,934,016 bytes Device is:In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: 8 ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 4 Local Time is:Thu Feb 17 00:52:56 2011 EST SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled drive drops/resets here ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] disable zfs/zpool destroy for root user
Hi all, is there a way to disable the subcommand destroy of zpool/zfs for the root user? Best regards Stefan ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] disable zfs/zpool destroy for root user
On Feb 17, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Stefan Dormayer wrote: Hi all, is there a way to disable the subcommand destroy of zpool/zfs for the root user? Which OS? -- richard ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] disable zfs/zpool destroy for root user
It's Solaris 11 Express... Stefan Am 17.02.2011 22:07, schrieb Richard Elling: On Feb 17, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Stefan Dormayer wrote: Hi all, is there a way to disable the subcommand destroy of zpool/zfs for the root user? Which OS? -- richard ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] disable zfs/zpool destroy for root user
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 17, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Stefan Dormayer wrote: Hi all, is there a way to disable the subcommand destroy of zpool/zfs for the root user? Which OS? Heheh. Great answer. The real answer depends also on what the OP meant by root. root in Solaris isn't the all-powerful thing it used to be, or, rather, it is, but its power can be limited. And not just on Solaris either. The OP's question is difficult to answer because the question isn't the one the OP really wants to ask -- we must tease out that real question, or guess. I'd start with: just what is it that you want to accomplish? Nico -- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
