Re: [zfs-discuss] Question: created non global zone with ZFS underneath the root filesystem
Thank you Al for your quick response. I will forward this info to customer and inform him about it. Arlina- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Question: created non global zone with ZFS underneath the root filesystem
All, Customer would like to confirm this if this is supported or not. = I've created non global zones with ZFS underneath the root filesystem for a new SAP environment that's approaching production next week. Then I read that its not supported, but many people in the discussions boards and in google searches are doing it. Would like to know the truth, and if I need to back it out, how. = Thank you in advance, Arlina NOTE: Please email me directly as i'm not on this alias. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] [Fwd: RESEND: [Fwd: Queston: after installing SunMC 3.6.1 ability to view the ZFS gui has disappeared]]
All, Anyone for this? I haven't received any informations regarding this. This is my third attempt and i would appreciate if you can send me any info you have. TIA, Arlina NOTE: Please email me directly as i'm not on this alias. --- Begin Message --- I'm resending this again since i haven't received anything from anybody. Any suggestions i would appreciate it. Thanks, Arlina- --- Begin Message --- Customer opened a case with an issue regarding the ability of the ZFS gui which disappeared under the menu storage. This is after loading the SunMC 3.6.1. More informations from customer's email below: Yes, I just installed Solaris 10 6/06 on an Ultra 25 for testing, we'll be using ZFS on an E2900 very soon. I was evaluating the zfs and was looking into the SMC as well for zone management and loaded SMC on to the Ultra 25. When I started up the below link for zfs, java web console started up in it's place. Under the menu storage should have ZFS underneath it, but it wasn't there, only Solaris Container Manager. As for the SMC installation I took the defaults except for snmp. The disks show up via command line, however, the problem is this. The ZFS gui management tool and the sun management center gui both use port 6789 as the java web console. After I installed SunMC, the ability to view the zfs gui has disappeared. I thought you could do all the above from the web port 6789, but SunMC seems to have 'overwritten' the zfs management gui. Any ideas? = TIA, Arlina NOTE: Please email me directly as i'm not on this alias. --- End Message --- --- End Message --- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] [Fwd: Queston: after installing SunMC 3.6.1 ability to view the ZFS gui has disappeared]
I'm forwarding this inquiry to this alias as well just in case somebody can suggests or provide any informations. Thank you in advance, Arlina- --- Begin Message --- Customer opened a case with an issue regarding the ability of the ZFS gui which disappeared under the menu storage. This is after loading the SunMC 3.6.1. More informations from customer's email below: Yes, I just installed Solaris 10 6/06 on an Ultra 25 for testing, we'll be using ZFS on an E2900 very soon. I was evaluating the zfs and was looking into the SMC as well for zone management and loaded SMC on to the Ultra 25. When I started up the below link for zfs, java web console started up in it's place. Under the menu storage should have ZFS underneath it, but it wasn't there, only Solaris Container Manager. As for the SMC installation I took the defaults except for snmp. The disks show up via command line, however, the problem is this. The ZFS gui management tool and the sun management center gui both use port 6789 as the java web console. After I installed SunMC, the ability to view the zfs gui has disappeared. I thought you could do all the above from the web port 6789, but SunMC seems to have 'overwritten' the zfs management gui. Any ideas? = TIA, Arlina NOTE: Please email me directly as i'm not on this alias. --- End Message --- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Need Help: Getting error "zfs:bad checksum (read on off...)
Hello Matthew, Thanks for your very helpful informations. While waiting for your reply, i checed the ZFS admin Guide and it was in there, on page 150. :-) Have a good weekend. Thanks again. Arlina- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Need Help: Getting error "zfs:bad checksum (read on off...)
All, Customer who has 15K running Solaris 10 6/06 with 3510 array attached, has a disk array failure and ZFS was mirroring. The system panic and can't boot off either in single user mode nor in multi-user mode. The panic error shows: IMPACT:panic[cpu512]/thread=2a1022a7cc0: ZFS: bad checksum (read on off 0: zio 3003ca93900 [L0 SPA space map] 1000L/a00P DVA[0]=<1:11128e9400:a00> DVA[1]=<2:111204e400:a00> fletcher4 lzjb BE contiguous birth=794148 fill=1 cksum=71ac8b094c:9a49ad9f14f9:7b1154b0bb95af:49201a336bbfbf6a): error 50 02a1022a7740 zfs:zio_done+284 (3003ca93900, 0, a8, 70785be0, 0, 3001847d240) %l0-3: 030019a1fcc0 03003e8646c0 0032 0032 %l4-7: 0002 0001 0032 02a1022a7940 zfs:zio_vdev_io_assess+178 (3003ca93900, 8000, 10, 0, 0, 10) %l0-3: 0001 0002 0032 %l4-7: 030017a34000 02a1022a7a00 genunix:taskq_thread+1a4 (30019a2b670, 30019a2b618, 50001, d548643cc3, 2a1022a7aca, 2a1022a7ac8) %l0-3: 0001 030019a2b640 030019a2b648 030019a2b64a %l4-7: 030019b0c9e0 0002 030019a2b638 Customer's main concern right now is to make the system bootable but it seems couldn't do that since the bad disks is part of the zfs filesystems. Is there a way to disable or clear out the bad zfs filesystem so system can be booted? Also i did search on the error "ZFS: bad checksum" error and i found some bugs. Any assistance on this issue is greatly appreciated. Customer's domain is still down at this point. TIA, Arlina NOTE: PLease email me directly as i'm not on this alias. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Question: Looking for ways on copying zfs filesys between disks
Thanks Matthew for your quick response. And as always for all of your assistance on my zfs inquiries. I really appreciate it. Have a good weekend. Arlina- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Question: Looking for ways on copying zfs filesys between disks
All, System (SunFire T2000) migrated to Solaris 10 6/06 and old lucopy methods do not work for copying zfs filesystems between disks for backups. Customer is looking for way to do "ufsdump" type method between c0t0d0s4 and c0t2d0s4 for backup? I checked the ZFS Admin guide and i saw regarding ZFS backups and restore commands like "zfs send" and "zfs receive". More informations can be found on page 96 of the admin guide. Is this what the customer is looking for? Any suggestions? Thank you in advance, Arlina NOTE: Please email me directly as i'm not on this alias. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Need Help: didn't create the pool as radiz but stripes
Boyd and all, Just an update of what happened and what the customer found out regarding the issue. === It does appear that the disk is fill up by 140G. I think I now know what happen. I created a raidz pool and I did not write any data to it before I just pulled out a disk. So I believe the zfs filesystem did not initialize yet. So this is why my zfs filesystem was unusable. Can you confirm this? But when I created a zfs filesystem and wrote data to it, it could now lose a disk and just be degraded. I tested this part by removing the disk partition in format. I will try this same test to re-duplicate my issue, but can you confirm for me if my zfs filesystem as a raidz requires me to write data to it first before it's really ready? [EMAIL PROTECTED] df -k Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s04136995 2918711 117691572%/ /devices 0 0 0 0%/devices ctfs 0 0 0 0%/system/contract proc 0 0 0 0%/proc mnttab 0 0 0 0%/etc/mnttab swap 5563996 616 5563380 1%/etc/svc/volatile objfs 0 0 0 0%/system/object /usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap2.so.1 4136995 2918711 117691572%/lib/libc.so.1 fd 0 0 0 0%/dev/fd /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s54136995 78182 4017444 2%/var /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s741369954126 4091500 1%/tmp swap 5563400 20 5563380 1%/var/run /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s64136995 38674 4056952 1%/opt pool 210567315 210566773 0 100%/pool / [EMAIL PROTECTED] cd /pool /pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -la total 421133452 drwxr-xr-x 2 root sys3 Aug 23 17:19 . drwxr-xr-x 25 root root 512 Aug 23 20:34 .. -rw--- 1 root root 171798691840 Aug 23 17:43 nullfile /pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] zpool status pool: pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Attach the missing device and online it using 'zpool online'. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-D3 scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM poolDEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz DEGRADED 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 UNAVAIL 15.12 10.27 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors AND SECOND EMAIL: I'm unable to re-duplicate my failed zfs pool using raidz. As for the disk size bug (6288488 and 2140116), I have a few questions. The developer said that it would be fixed in u3. When is u3 suppose to be release? U2 just came out. Also, can or will = Any ideas when the Solaris 10 update 3 (11/06) be released? And would this be fixed in Solaris 10 update 2 (6/06)? Thanks to all of you. Arlina- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Need Help: didn't create the pool as radiz but stripes
Hello James, Thanks for the response. Yes. I got the bug id# and forwarded that to customer. But cu said that he can create a large file that is large as the stripe of the 3 disks. And if he pull a disk, the whole zpool failes, so there's no degraded pools, just fails. Any idea on this? Thank you,. Arlina- ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Need Help: didn't create the pool as radiz but stripes
I need help on this and don't know what to give to customer. System is V40z running Solaris 10 x86 and customer is trying to create 3 disks as Raidz. After creating the pool, looking at the disk space and configuration, he thinks that this is not raidz pool but rather stripes. THis is what exactly he told me so i'm not sure if this makes sense to all of you. Any assistance and help is greatly appreciated. THank you in advance, Arlina NOTE: Please email me directly as i'm not on this alias. Below are more informations. = Command used: # zpool create pool raidz c1t2d0 c1t3d0 c1t4d0 From the format command: 0. c1t0d0 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci17c2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 1. c1t2d0 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci17c2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 2. c1t3d0 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci17c2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 3. c1t4d0 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci17c2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 The pool status: # zpool status pool: pool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE (BREAD WRITE CKSUM poolONLINE 0 0 0 raidz ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors The df -k output of te newly created pool as raidz. # df -k Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on pool 210567168 49 210567033 1%/pool I can create a file that is large as the stripe of the 3 disks. So the information reported is correct. Also, if I pull a disk out, the whole zpool fails! There is no degraded pools, it just fails. === ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
