Re: [zfs-discuss] Can VirtualBox run a 64 bit guests on 32 bit host

2009-02-26 Thread Marco Lopes
Correct, VirtualBox 2.1 and above will allow a 64 bit VM on top of a 32 
bit host OS, but it requires a CPU with AMD-V or VT-x support.  Without 
the CPU virtualization extensions Virtualbox will only allow a 32 bit VM 
on a 32 bit host OS.


For the Athlon64 chip AMD-V will only be present for socket-F and newer 
chips.



Marco.


Blake wrote:

The changelog says 64-bit guest on 32-bit host support was added in 2.1:

http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Brian Hechinger wo...@4amlunch.net wrote:

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 07:14:14PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:

My whole purpose is to experiment with zfs... would I see much
difference if opensol was installed 64 bit as compared to 32 bit?

I noticed the Simon blogs that describe how to setup a home zfs server
( http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ )
mention it is best setup 64 bit, but no real reason is given.

I think it would be better to answer this question that it would to attempt
to answer the VirtualBox question (I run it on a 64-bit OS, so I can't really
answer that anyway).

The benefit to running ZFS on a 64-bit OS is if you have a large amount of RAM.
I don't know what the breaking point is, but I can definitely tell you that a
32-bit kernel and 4GB ram doesn't mix well.  If all you are doing is testing ZFS
on VMs you probably aren't all that worried about performance so it really 
shouldn't
be an issue for you to run 32-bit.  I'd say keep your RAM allocations down, and 
I
wish I knew what to tell you to keep it under.  Hopefully someone who has a 
better
grasp of all that can chime in.

Once you put it on real hardware, however, you really want a 64-bit CPU and as 
much
RAM as you can toss at the machine.

-brian
--
Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta
tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of
pop tarts and pancake mix. -- IRC User (http://www.bash.org/?841435)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] How to destory a faulted pool

2007-11-16 Thread Marco Lopes
Manoj,


# zpool destroy -f mstor0


Regards,
Marco Lopes.


Manoj Nayak wrote:

How I can destroy the following pool  ?

pool: mstor0
id: 5853485601755236913
 state: FAULTED
status: One or more devices contains corrupted data.
action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data.
   see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E
config:

mstor0  UNAVAIL   insufficient replicas
  raidz1UNAVAIL   insufficient replicas
c5t0d0  FAULTED   corrupted data
c4t0d0  FAULTED   corrupted data
c1t0d0  ONLINE
c0t0d0  ONLINE


pool: zpool1
id: 14693037944182338678
 state: FAULTED
status: One or more devices are missing from the system.
action: The pool cannot be imported. Attach the missing
devices and try again.
   see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-3C
config:

zpool1  UNAVAIL   insufficient replicas
  raidz1UNAVAIL   insufficient replicas
c0t1d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
c1t1d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
c4t1d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
c6t1d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
c7t1d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
  raidz1UNAVAIL   insufficient replicas
c0t2d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
c1t2d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
c4t2d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
c6t2d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
c7t2d0  UNAVAIL   cannot open
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
  



-- 

Marco S. Lopes
Senior Technical Specialist
US Systems Practice
Professional Services Delivery
Sun Microsystems
925 984 6611

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss