Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS with SAN's and HA
Hi Michael, Have a look at this Blog/WP http://blogs.sun.com/TF/entry/new_white_paper_practicing_solaris for an example on how to use a iSCSI target from a NAS device as storage, you can just replace the tomcat/mysql HA services with HA nfs and you have what you are looking for. /peter On 8/27/10 11:25 , Michael Dodwell wrote: Lao, I had a look at the HAStoragePlus etc and from what i understand that's to mirror local storage across 2 nodes for services to be able to access 'DRBD style'. Having a read thru the documentation on the oracle site the cluster software from what i gather is how to cluster services together (oracle/apache etc) and again any documentation i've found on storage is how to duplicate local storage to multiple hosts for HA failover. Can't really see anything on clustering services to use shared storage/zfs pools. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS issue with ZFS
Hi Phillip, What's the permissions on the directory where you try to write to, and what user are you using on the client system, it's most likely a UID mapping issue between the client and the server. /peter On 8/14/10 3:19 , Phillip Bruce wrote: I have Solaris 10 U7 that is exporting ZFS filesytem. The client is Solaris 9 U7. I can mount the filesytem just fine but I am unable to write to it. showmount -e shows my mount is set for everyone. the dfstab file has option rw set. So what gives? Phillip ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS issue with ZFS
On 8/14/10 11:49 , Phillip Bruce (Mindsource) wrote: Peter, what would you expect for root? That is the user I am at. root is default mapped to annon, if you don't specifically export it with the option to allow root on one or more clients to be mapped to local root on the server. zfs set sharenfs=rw,root=host zpool/fs/to/export where host is a ':' separated list of hosts. Alternatively, if you want root from any host to be mapped to root on the server (bad idea), you can do something like this zfs set sharenfs=rw,anon=0 zpool/fs/to/export to allow root access to all hosts. /peter Like I already stated it is NOT a UID or GUID issue. Both systems are the same. Try as a different user that have the same uid on both systems and have write access to the directory in qustion. Phillip From: Peter Karlsson [peter.k.karls...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 7:23 PM To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; Phillip Bruce (Mindsource) Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS issue with ZFS Hi Phillip, What's the permissions on the directory where you try to write to, and what user are you using on the client system, it's most likely a UID mapping issue between the client and the server. /peter On 8/14/10 3:19 , Phillip Bruce wrote: I have Solaris 10 U7 that is exporting ZFS filesytem. The client is Solaris 9 U7. I can mount the filesytem just fine but I am unable to write to it. showmount -e shows my mount is set for everyone. the dfstab file has option rw set. So what gives? Phillip ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Mirroring USB Drive with Laptop for Backup purposes
Hi Matt, Don't know if it's recommended or not, but I've been doing it for close to 3 years on my OpenSolaris laptop, it saved me a few times like last week when my internal drive died :) /peter On 2010-05-04 20.33, Matt Keenan wrote: Hi, Just wondering whether mirroring a USB drive with main laptop disk for backup purposes is recommended or not. Current setup, single root pool set up on 200GB internal laptop drive : $ zpool status pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: non requested config : NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 I have a 320GB external USB drive which I'd like to configure as a mirror of this root pool (I know it will only use 200GB of the eternal one, not worried about that). Plan would be to connect the USB drive, once or twice a week, let it resilver, and then disconnect again. Connecting USB drive 24/7 would AFAIK have performance issues for the Laptop. This would have the added benefit of the USB drive being bootable. - Recommended or not ? - Are there known issues with this type of setup ? cheers Matt ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] question about which build to install
Wrong list But anyhow I was able to install b128 and then upgrade to b130. I had relink some OpenGL files to get Compiz to work but apart from that it looks OK. /peter On 2010-01-22 11.03, Thomas Burgess wrote: I installed b130 on my server, and i'm being hit by this bug: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13540 Where i can't log into gnome. I've bee trying to deal with it hoping that i a workaround would show up.. if there IS a workaround, i'd love to have it...if not, i'm wondering: is there another version i can downgrade to? I'm pretty new to opensolaris and i've tried to google to find this answer but i can't find it. my zpool is version 22. thanks for any help. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris10 10/09 ZFS shared via CIFS?
Hi Trevor, The native CIFS/SMB stuff was never backported to S10, so you would have to use the Samba on your S10 vm Cheers, Peter Trevor Pretty wrote: Team I'm missing something? First off I normally play around with OpenSolaris it's been a while since I played with Solaris 10. I'm doing all this via VirtualBox (Vista host) and I've set-up the network (I believe) as I can ping, ssh and telnet from Vista into the S10 virtual machine 192.168.56.101. I've set smbshare on. But there seems to be non the the CIFS commands you get in OpenSolaris and when I point a file browser (or whatever it's called in Windows) at \\192.168.56.101 I can't access it. I would also expect a file name in .zfs/share like it says in the man pages, but there is non. What have I missed? RTFMs more than welcome :-) Details. bash-3.00# zfs get sharesmb sam_pool/backup NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE sam_pool/backup sharesmb onlocal bash-3.00# ls -al /sam_pool/backup/.zfs total 3 dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 3 Aug 11 14:26 . drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 8 Aug 18 09:52 .. dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 2 Aug 11 14:26 snapshot bash-3.00# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 e1000g0: flags=1004843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4 mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.56.101 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.56.255 ether 8:0:27:84:cb:f5 bash-3.00# cat /etc/release Solaris 10 10/09 s10x_u8wos_08a X86 Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 16 September 2009 === www.eagle.co.nz This email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris10 10/09 ZFS shared via CIFS?
Trevor Pretty wrote: Tim Cook wrote: On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Trevor Pretty trevor_pre...@eagle.co.nz mailto:trevor_pre...@eagle.co.nz wrote: Team I'm missing something? First off I normally play around with OpenSolaris it's been a while since I played with Solaris 10. I'm doing all this via VirtualBox (Vista host) and I've set-up the network (I believe) as I can ping, ssh and telnet from Vista into the S10 virtual machine 192.168.56.101. I've set smbshare on. But there seems to be non the the CIFS commands you get in OpenSolaris and when I point a file browser (or whatever it's called in Windows) at \\192.168.56.101 I can't access it. I would also expect a file name in .zfs/share like it says in the man pages, but there is non. What have I missed? RTFMs more than welcome :-) Details. bash-3.00# zfs get sharesmb sam_pool/backup NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE sam_pool/backup sharesmb onlocal bash-3.00# ls -al /sam_pool/backup/.zfs total 3 dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 3 Aug 11 14:26 . drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 8 Aug 18 09:52 .. dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 2 Aug 11 14:26 snapshot bash-3.00# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 e1000g0: flags=1004843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4 mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.56.101 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.56.255 ether 8:0:27:84:cb:f5 bash-3.00# cat /etc/release Solaris 10 10/09 s10x_u8wos_08a X86 Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 16 September 2009 I thought I had heard forever ago that the native cifs implementation wouldn't ever be put back to solaris10 due to the fact it makes significant changes to the kernel. Maybe I'm crazy though. I would think an ls would tell you if it was or not. Do you see this output when you run a '/bin/ls -dV'? root# /bin/ls -dV / drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 35 Nov 15 10:58 / owner@:--:---:deny owner@:rwxp---A-W-Co-:---:allow group@:-w-p--:---:deny group@:r-x---:---:allow everyone@:-w-p---A-W-Co-:---:deny everyone@:r-x---a-R-c--s:---:allow -- --Tim Yep! bash-3.00# /bin/ls -dV / drwxr-xr-x 46 root root 63 Nov 23 11:41 / owner@:--:--:deny owner@:rwxp---A-W-Co-:--:allow group@:-w-p--:--:deny group@:r-x---:--:allow everyone@:-w-p---A-W-Co-:--:deny everyone@:r-x---a-R-c--s:--:allow bash-3.00# Nope this is just zfs acls, doesn't have anything to do with the CIFS server /peter I think the server is in but not the client but I can't find sharemgr either. */ /* www.eagle.co.nz http://www.eagle.co.nz/ This email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris10 10/09 ZFS shared via CIFS?
Trevor Pretty wrote: OK I've also a S700 simulator as a VM and it seems to have done what I would expect. 7000# zfs get sharesmb pool-0/local/trevors_stuff/tlp NAMEPROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool-0/local/trevors_stuff/tlp sharesmb name=trevors_stuff_tlp inherited from pool-0/local/trevors_stuff 7000# cd /var/ak/shares/web/export/tlp/.zfs 7000# ls shares/ trevors_stuff_tlp It also has sharemgr which seems to be missing in S10. Jepp, it would as it's OpenSolaris based :) /peter Trevor Pretty wrote: Team I'm missing something? First off I normally play around with OpenSolaris it's been a while since I played with Solaris 10. I'm doing all this via VirtualBox (Vista host) and I've set-up the network (I believe) as I can ping, ssh and telnet from Vista into the S10 virtual machine 192.168.56.101. I've set smbshare on. But there seems to be non the the CIFS commands you get in OpenSolaris and when I point a file browser (or whatever it's called in Windows) at \\192.168.56.101 I can't access it. I would also expect a file name in .zfs/share like it says in the man pages, but there is non. What have I missed? RTFMs more than welcome :-) Details. bash-3.00# zfs get sharesmb sam_pool/backup NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE sam_pool/backup sharesmb onlocal bash-3.00# ls -al /sam_pool/backup/.zfs total 3 dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 3 Aug 11 14:26 . drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 8 Aug 18 09:52 .. dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 2 Aug 11 14:26 snapshot bash-3.00# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 e1000g0: flags=1004843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4 mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.56.101 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.56.255 ether 8:0:27:84:cb:f5 bash-3.00# cat /etc/release Solaris 10 10/09 s10x_u8wos_08a X86 Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 16 September 2009 === www.eagle.co.nz This email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs incremental-forever
Hi Tobias, I did this for a large lab we had last month, I have it setup something like this. zfs snapshot [EMAIL PROTECTED] zfs send -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh server2 zfs recv rep_pool ssh zfs destroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] ssh zfs rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] zfs destroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] zfs rename [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was using this for a set up with on master systems and 100 system that I replicated the zpool to, and I had scripts that was used when a student logged out to do a zfs rollback [EMAIL PROTECTED] to reset it to known state to be ready for a new student. I don't have the actual script I used here right now, so I might have missed some flags, but you see that basic flow of it. /peter On Jun 6, 2008, at 14:07, Tobias Exner wrote: Hi, I'm thinking about the following situation and I know there are some things I have to understand: I want to use two SUN-Servers with the same amount of storage capacity on both of them and I want to replicate the filesystem ( zfs ) incrementally two times a day from the first to the second one. I know that the zfs send/receive commands will do the job, but I don't understand exactly how zfs will know what have to be transferred.. Is it the difference to the last snapshot? If yes, does that mean that I have to keep all snapshots to achieve an incremental-forever configuration? -- That's my goal! regards, Tobias Exner ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs incremental-forever
Or you could use Tim Fosters ZFS snapshot service http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_automatic_snapshots_now_with /peter On Jun 6, 2008, at 14:07, Tobias Exner wrote: Hi, I'm thinking about the following situation and I know there are some things I have to understand: I want to use two SUN-Servers with the same amount of storage capacity on both of them and I want to replicate the filesystem ( zfs ) incrementally two times a day from the first to the second one. I know that the zfs send/receive commands will do the job, but I don't understand exactly how zfs will know what have to be transferred.. Is it the difference to the last snapshot? If yes, does that mean that I have to keep all snapshots to achieve an incremental-forever configuration? -- That's my goal! regards, Tobias Exner ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Image with DD from ZFS partition
Hi Hans, Think what you are looking for would be a combination of a snapshot and zfs send/receive, that would give you an archive that you can use to recreate your zfs filesystems on your zpool at will at later time. So you can do something like this Create archive : zfs snapshot -r [EMAIL PROTECTED] zfs send -R [EMAIL PROTECTED] mypool_archive.zfs Restore from archive: zpool create mynewpool disk1 disk2 zfs receive -d -F mypool_archive.zfs Doing this will create an archive that contains all descendent file systems of mypool, that can be restored at a later time, with out depending on how the zpool is organized. /peter On May 7, 2008, at 23:31, Hans wrote: thank you for your posting. well i still have problems understanding how a pool works. when i have one partition with zfs like this: /dev/sda1 - ZFS /dev/sda2 - ext2 the only pool is on the sda1 device. in this way i can backup it with the dd command. now i try to understand: when i have 2 zfs partitions like this: /dev/sda1 -ZFS /dev/sda2 -ZFS /dev/sda3 -ext2 i cannot copy only sda1 with dd and leave sda2 because i destroy the pool then. is it possible to seperate two partitions in this way, that i can backup one seperatley? the normal linux way is that every partition is mountet into the file-system tree, but is in his way to store data different. so at linux you can mount a ext3 and reiserfs together to one file-system tree. zfs is different. it spreads data over the partitions how it is the best way for zfs. maybe i can compare it a little with a raid 0 where data is spread over several harddisks. on a raid0 it is impossible to backup one harddisk and restore it , in this way i cannot backup a zfs partition and leafe other zfs partions. well i think a snapshot is not what i want. i want a image that i can use at any problems. so i can install an new version of solaris, installing software. and then say... not good. restore image. or whatever i want. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool shared between OSX and Solaris on a MacBook Pro
On Feb 19, 2008, at 17:27, Darren J Moffat wrote: Peter Karlsson wrote: Hi, I got my MacBook pro set up to dual boot between Solaris and OSX and I have created a zpool to use as a shred storage for documents etc.. However got this strange thing when trying to access the zpool from Solaris, only root can see it?? I created the zpool on OSX as they are using an old version of the on disk format, if I create a zpool on Solaris all users can see it, strange What do you mean by only root can see it As root: -bash-3.2# ls -ld /zpace drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 9 Feb 19 12:28 /zpace As myself: ls -ld /zpace /zpace: Permission denied bash-3.2$ cd /zpace bash: cd: /zpace: Permission denied So I create a zpool on Solaris -bash-3.2# zpool create ztst /export/home/tst/a /export/home/tst/b /export/home/tst/c bash-3.2$ ls -ld /ztst drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2 Feb 19 17:23 /ztst bash-3.2$ cd /ztst So that works, so something is strange with the zpool I created in OSX All files are owned by root ? Nope, some files are owned by other users, Users don't see the datasets with zfs list ? Can: bash-3.2$ /sbin/zpool list NAMESIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT zpace61G 715M 60.3G 1% ONLINE - Users don't see the mounted filesystems with df ? Nope: /zpace (zpace ):124462673 blocks 124462673 files df: cannot statvfs /zpace/DB: Permission denied df: cannot statvfs /zpace/Download: Permission denied df: cannot statvfs /zpace/demo: Permission denied Users don't even see the pool with zpool status ? Can: bash-3.2$ /sbin/zpool status pool: zpace state: ONLINE status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the pool will no longer be accessible on older software versions. scrub: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM zpace ONLINE 0 0 0 c1d0p4ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors bash-3.2$ /sbin/zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zpace715M 59.3G 586K /zpace zpace/DB29.5K 59.3G 29.5K /zpace/DB zpace/Download 648M 59.3G 648M /zpace/Download zpace/demo 66.2M 59.3G 66.2M /zpace/demo This looks strange: zpace delegation off default That's the default on OSX, as I created the file system on OSX On Solaris it reports delegation on bash-3.2$ /sbin/zpool get all zpace NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE zpace size 61G - zpace used 715M- zpace available60.3G - zpace capacity 1% - zpace altroot - default zpace health ONLINE - zpace guid 2692302108782490543 - zpace version 6 local zpace bootfs - default zpace delegation on default zpace autoreplace off default zpace cachefile- default zpace failmode waitdefault The default is on not off. What build of Solaris are you using ? snvx_b80 Also see this: zpace/demo mountpoint /Volumes/zpace/demodefault It was from OSX, I should note that ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zpool shared between OSX and Solaris on a MacBook Pro
Hi, I got my MacBook pro set up to dual boot between Solaris and OSX and I have created a zpool to use as a shred storage for documents etc.. However got this strange thing when trying to access the zpool from Solaris, only root can see it?? I created the zpool on OSX as they are using an old version of the on disk format, if I create a zpool on Solaris all users can see it, strange Any ideas on what might be the issue here?? Cheers, Peter root# zpool get all zpace NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE zpace bootfs - default zpace autoreplace off default zpace delegation off default root# zfs get all zpace/demo NAMEPROPERTY VALUE SOURCE zpace/demo typefilesystem - zpace/demo creationSat Feb 16 13:25 2008 - zpace/demo used66.2M - zpace/demo available 59.3G - zpace/demo referenced 66.2M - zpace/demo compressratio 1.00x - zpace/demo mounted yes- zpace/demo quota none default zpace/demo reservation none default zpace/demo recordsize 128K default zpace/demo mountpoint /Volumes/zpace/demodefault zpace/demo sharenfsoffdefault zpace/demo checksumon default zpace/demo compression offdefault zpace/demo atime on default zpace/demo devices on default zpace/demo execon default zpace/demo setuid on default zpace/demo readonlyoffdefault zpace/demo zoned offdefault zpace/demo snapdir hidden default zpace/demo aclmode groupmask default zpace/demo aclinherit secure default zpace/demo canmounton default zpace/demo shareiscsi offdefault zpace/demo xattr on default zpace/demo copies 1 default zpace/demo version 2 - ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: External drive enclosures + Sun Server for massstorage
Hi Frank, try man devfsadm, it will update devfs with your new disk drives. disks is an older command that does about the same thing. Cheers, Peter Frank Cusack wrote: On January 22, 2007 12:12:19 PM -0600 Brian Hechinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:39:19AM -0800, Frank Cusack wrote: On January 21, 2007 12:15:22 AM -0200 Toby Thain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To be clear: the X2100 drives are neither hotswap nor hotplug under Solaris. Replacing a failed drive requires a reboot. Also, adding a drive that wasn't present at boot requires a reboot. This couldn't possibly be true, unless we've taken major steps backwards as this has always been possible (at least on sparc) It is true. Try it. [Sorry to send a reply to a personal mail back to the list, but your email address bounces 450 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: Domain not found] -frank ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
