Re: [zfs-discuss] SATA 6G controller for OSOL
Brandon High wrote: On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Vladimir Kotal vladimir.ko...@sun.com mailto:vladimir.ko...@sun.com wrote: Could you be more specific about the problems with 88SE9123, especially with SATA ? I am in the process of setting up a system with AD2SA6GPX1 HBA based on this chipset (at least according to the product pages [*]). http://lmgtfy.com/?q=marvell+9123+problems The problems seem to be mostly with the PATA controller that's built in. Regardless, Marvell no longer offers the 9123. Any vendor offering cards based on it is probably using chips bought as surplus or for recycling. I spent some time going through the past news about various motherboard vendors delaying new products because of the PATA issue. According to the Marvell PR there seems to be no issue with the SATA side of the chip. Other than that (and the possible PCIe x1 scaling issue with SATA III) there should be no problem with the card itself. However, the card does not work in OpenSolaris yet because of: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6967746 v. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] SATA 6G controller for OSOL
On 07/ 9/10 09:58 AM, Brandon High wrote: On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM, James Van Artsdalen james-opensola...@jrv.org wrote: If these 6 Gb/s controllers are based on the Marvell part I would test them thoroughly before deployment - those chips have been problematic. The Marvell 88SE9123 was the troublemaker, and it's not available anymore. The 88SE9120, 88SE9125 and 88SE9128 are the fixed versions. Could you be more specific about the problems with 88SE9123, especially with SATA ? I am in the process of setting up a system with AD2SA6GPX1 HBA based on this chipset (at least according to the product pages [*]). v. [*] http://www.addonics.com/products/host_controller/ad2sa6gpx1.asp ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs send speed. Was: User quota design discussion..
Jorgen Lundman wrote: We finally managed to upgrade the production x4500s to Sol 10 10/08 (unrelated to this) but with the hope that it would also make zfs send usable. Exactly how does build 105 translate to Solaris 10 10/08? My current There is no easy/obvious mapping of Solaris Nevada builds to Solaris 10 update releases. Solaris Nevada started as a branch of S10 after it was released and is the place where new features (RFEs) are developed. For a bug fix or RFE to end up in Solaris 10 update release it needs to match certain criteria. Basically, only those CRs which are found necessary (and this applies to both bugs and features) are backported to S10uX. v. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS home server SATA disk setup
Jon Tsu wrote: Hi I am currently running a ZFS home server and want to add more disks. However my motherboard only has 4 SATA ports which are all used as follows: Onboard SATA1 : Boot disk Onboard SATA2 : ZFS Disk 1 Onboard SATA3 : ZFS Disk 2 Onboard SATA4 : ZFS Disk 3 I wish to purchase a 4 port SATA PCI controller card (StarTech.com 4 Port PCI SATA uses the Silicom Image SIL3114 Chipset) to accommodate an extra disk in the following configuration: Avoid the SiL3112 and SiL3114 chipsets (I did throw mine SiL3114 based PCI card away). see: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=286090 http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=37556 v. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] sys_mount problem
Hello, I'm trying to set ZFS to work with RBAC so that I could manage all ZFS stuff w/out root. However, in my setup there is sys_mount privilege needed: - without sys_mount: vk199839:tessier:~$ zpool list NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT local 264G 71.4G193G27% ONLINE - vk199839:tessier:~$ profiles ZFS Storage Management ZFS File system Management Basic Solaris User All vk199839:tessier:~$ ppriv $$ 317:bash flags = none E: basic,dtrace_kernel,dtrace_proc,dtrace_user I: basic,dtrace_kernel,dtrace_proc,dtrace_user P: basic,dtrace_kernel,dtrace_proc,dtrace_user L: all vk199839:tessier:~$ pfexec zfs create local/testfs cannot create 'local/testfs': permission denied vk199839:tessier:~$ pfexec truss zfs create local/testfs snip zone_lookup(0x) = 0 ioctl(4, ZFS_IOC_OBJSET_STATS, 0x0804679C) Err#2 ENOENT ioctl(4, ZFS_IOC_CREATE, 0x0804679C)Err#1 EPERM [sys_mount] brk(0x080CA000) = 0 fstat64(2, 0x080457C0) = 0 cannot create 'write(2, c a n n o t c r e a t.., 15) = 15 local/testfswrite(2, l o c a l / t e s t f s, 12)= 12 ': permission deniedwrite(2, ' : p e r m i s s i o.., 20) = 20 - however with sys_mount: vk199839:tessier:~$ ppriv $$ 434:/usr/bin/bash flags = none E: basic,dtrace_kernel,dtrace_proc,dtrace_user,sys_mount I: basic,dtrace_kernel,dtrace_proc,dtrace_user,sys_mount P: basic,dtrace_kernel,dtrace_proc,dtrace_user,sys_mount L: all vk199839:tessier:~$ profiles ZFS Storage Management ZFS File system Management Basic Solaris User All vk199839:tessier:~$ pfexec zfs create local/testfs vk199839:tessier:~$ echo $? 0 vk199839:tessier:~$ zfs list |grep testfs local/testfs 9K 191G 9K /local/testfs vk199839:sier:~$ ls -ald /local/testfs/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root sys2 Sep 12 19:15 /local/testfs/ vk199839:tessier:~$ ls -ald /local/ drwxrwxr-x 14 vk199839 sys 16 Sep 12 19:15 /local/ Any idea what is wrong ? Also, I would like the fs to be created with vk199839:sys and not with root:sys ownership. v. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
