Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and savecore

2006-11-10 Thread johansen-osdev
This is CR: 4894692 caching data in heap inflates crash dump

I have a fix which I am testing now.  It still needs review from
Matt/Mark before it's eligible for putback, though.

-j

On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:40:40PM -0800, Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but I guess this topic will
> be bounced into the right direction from here.
> 
> With ZFS using as much physical memory as it can get, dumps and
> livedumps via 'savecore -L' are huge in size. I just tested it on my
> workstation and got a 1.8G vmcore file, when dumping only kernel
> pages. 
> 
> Might it be possible to add an extension that would make it possible,
> to support dumping without the whole ZFS cache? I guess this would
> make kernel live dumps smaller again, as they used to be...
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Cheers,
> Tom
>  
>  
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and savecore

2006-11-10 Thread Neil Perrin

You're right. A bug has already been raised for this:

4894692 caching data in heap inflates crash dump

Thomas Maier-Komor wrote On 11/10/06 15:40,:
Hi, 


I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but I guess this topic will be bounced 
into the right direction from here.

With ZFS using as much physical memory as it can get, dumps and livedumps via 'savecore -L' are huge in size. I just tested it on my workstation and got a 1.8G vmcore file, when dumping only kernel pages. 


Might it be possible to add an extension that would make it possible, to 
support dumping without the whole ZFS cache? I guess this would make kernel 
live dumps smaller again, as they used to be...

Any comments?

Cheers,
Tom
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and savecore

2006-11-10 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 14:40 -0800, Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
> Might it be possible to add an extension that would make it possible,
> to support dumping without the whole ZFS cache? I guess this would
> make kernel live dumps smaller again, as they used to be...

It's just a bug:

 4894692 caching data in heap inflates crash dump

I'd like to see it fixed, too; in addition to making crash dumps huge,
it also extends downtime (and thus reduces availability) for
large-configuration systems because of the time required to move the
data to disk as part of the dump.


- Bill


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] ZFS and savecore

2006-11-10 Thread Thomas Maier-Komor
Hi, 

I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but I guess this topic will be bounced 
into the right direction from here.

With ZFS using as much physical memory as it can get, dumps and livedumps via 
'savecore -L' are huge in size. I just tested it on my workstation and got a 
1.8G vmcore file, when dumping only kernel pages. 

Might it be possible to add an extension that would make it possible, to 
support dumping without the whole ZFS cache? I guess this would make kernel 
live dumps smaller again, as they used to be...

Any comments?

Cheers,
Tom
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss