Hi
Looks like same stack as 6413847, although it is pointed more towards hardware
failure.
the stack below is from 5.11 snv_38, but also seems to affect update 2 as
per above bug.
Enda
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Hi,
my colleage is just testing ZFS and created a zpool which had a backing store file on a TMPFS filesystem. After deleting the file everything still worked normally. But destroying the pool caused an assertion failure and a panic. I know this is neither a real-live szenario nor a good idea. The assertion failure occured on Solaris 10 update 2.
Below is some mdb output, in case someone is interested in this.
BTW: great to have Solaris 10 update 2 with ZFS. I can't wait to deploy it.
Cheers,
Tom
::panicinfo
cpu1
thread 2a100ea7cc0
message
assertion failed: vdev_config_sync(rvd, txg) == 0, file: ../../common/fs/zfs/spa
.c, line: 2149
tstate 4480001601
g1 30037505c40
g2 10
g32
g42
g53
g6 16
g7 2a100ea7cc0
o0 11eb1e8
o1 2a100ea7928
o2 306f5b0
o3 30037505c50
o4 3c7a000
o5 15
o6 2a100ea6ff1
o7 105e560
pc 104220c
npc 1042210
y 10
::stack
vpanic(11eb1e8, 13f01d8, 13f01f8, 865, 600026d4ef0, 60002793ac0)
assfail+0x7c(13f01d8, 13f01f8, 865, 183e000, 11eb000, 0)
spa_sync+0x190(60001f244c0, 3dd9, 600047f3500, 0, 2a100ea7cc4, 2a100ea7cbc)
txg_sync_thread+0x130(60001f9c580, 3dd9, 2a100ea7ab0, 60001f9c6a0, 60001f9c692,
60001f9c690)
thread_start+4(60001f9c580, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
::status
debugging crash dump vmcore.0 (64-bit) from ai
operating system: 5.11 snv_38 (sun4u)
panic message:
assertion failed: vdev_config_sync(rvd, txg) == 0, file: ../../common/fs/zfs/spa
.c, line: 2149
dump content: kernel pages only
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss