Re: [zfs-discuss] Downgrade zpool version?

2008-04-08 Thread Albert Lee

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 20:21 -0600, Keith Bierman wrote:
 On Apr 7, 2008, at 1:46 PM, David Loose wrote:
   my Solaris samba shares never really played well with iTunes.
 
 
 Another approach might be to stick with Solaris on the server, and  
 run netatalk netatalk.sourceforge.net instead of SAMBA (or, you  
 know your macs can speak NFS ;).

Alternatively you could run Banshee or mt-daapd on the Solaris box and
just rely on iTunes sharing. =P

Seriously, NFS is a totally reasonable way to go.

-Albert

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Downgrade zpool version?

2008-04-08 Thread David Loose
 Another approach might be to stick with Solaris on the server, and
 run netatalk instead of SAMBA (or, you
 know your macs can speak NFS ;).

 I also built mt-daapd on Solaris (just for fun) and iTunes can see that
 shared library - however this wasn't much use to me as I still want to
 use iTunes to manage/populate the library.

 Alternatively you could run Banshee or mt-daapd on the Solaris box and
 just rely on iTunes sharing. =P
 
 Seriously, NFS is a totally reasonable way to go.

Thanks for the replies. These are all good solutions that I've considered in 
the past. Having 1 Mac to manage all of my media is my ideal solution. It lets 
me sync all of the iPods in the house at 1 point and alleviates the pain of 
having to merge music from several computers to one central library. That said, 
my ideal solution seems to be a no-go at this point, so it looks like I'll have 
to settle on one of these suggestions anyway.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Downgrade zpool version?

2008-04-07 Thread Brandon High
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:46 PM, David Loose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The problem is that I upgraded to Solaris nv84 a while ago and bumped my 
 zpool to version 9 (I think) at that time. The Macintosh guys only support up 
 to version 8. There doesn't seem to be too much activity on the ZFS project 
 at macosforge.com so I'm guessing support for v9 isn't right around the 
 corner.

I'm not sure if it would work, but did you try to do zfs send / zfs
recv? If it's just sending the filesystem data, you may be able to get
around the zpool version problem.

-B

-- 
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The good is the enemy of the best. - Nietzsche
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Downgrade zpool version?

2008-04-07 Thread Keith Bierman

On Apr 7, 2008, at 1:46 PM, David Loose wrote:
  my Solaris samba shares never really played well with iTunes.


Another approach might be to stick with Solaris on the server, and  
run netatalk netatalk.sourceforge.net instead of SAMBA (or, you  
know your macs can speak NFS ;).
-- 
Keith H. Bierman   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | AIM kbiermank
5430 Nassau Circle East  |
Cherry Hills Village, CO 80113   | 303-997-2749
speaking for myself* Copyright 2008




___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss