Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-18 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:52:25PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
 Is it the parent snapshot for a clone?
   
 I'm almost certain it isn't.  I haven't created any clones and none show  
 in zpool history.

What about snapshot holds?  I don't know if (and doubt whether) these
are in S10, but since they produce exactly an EBUSY it's worth
checking. 

--
Dan


pgpmpqB2IMKLv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-18 Thread Ian Collins

Daniel Carosone wrote:

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:52:25PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
  

Is it the parent snapshot for a clone?
  
  
I'm almost certain it isn't.  I haven't created any clones and none show  
in zpool history.



What about snapshot holds?  I don't know if (and doubt whether) these
are in S10, but since they produce exactly an EBUSY it's worth
checking. 

  

Good idea but they were added in ZFS pool version 18 (b121).

I might have to destroy the filesystem and restore it.

Thanks for the input.

--
Ian.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-17 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:21:45PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
 I have a Solaris 10 update 6 system with a snapshot I can't remove.

 zfs destroy -f snap  reports the device as being busy.  fuser doesn't  
 shore any process using the filesystem and it isn't shared.

Is it the parent snapshot for a clone?

--
Dan.

pgpWXfJvd4hLh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Snapshot that won't go away.

2010-01-17 Thread Ian Collins

Daniel Carosone wrote:

On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:21:45PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
  

I have a Solaris 10 update 6 system with a snapshot I can't remove.

zfs destroy -f snap  reports the device as being busy.  fuser doesn't  
shore any process using the filesystem and it isn't shared.



Is it the parent snapshot for a clone?

  
I'm almost certain it isn't.  I haven't created any clones and none show 
in zpool history.


--
Ian.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss