Re: [Zim-wiki] Next in index, on same level?
2013/8/14 Jaap Karssenberg jaap.karssenb...@gmail.com: Afraid currently that is hardcoded. Coul dmake it optional, or could make the tree fold again after going to the next page. Point is that by fully disabling it, you have no direct view of sub-pages for cases where you do use them actively. True, subpages are often actually needed... and if I didn't favor flat, chronologic structures (since I end up tricking myself with overcomplicated structures otherwise) not having them show would be annoying. The most compatible solution would probably be binding the fold current tree and go to next to a new hotkey (Shift+Alt+Up/Down/PageUp/PageDown?) and make the folding an option. I made a makeshift solution with some gotchas by using AutoHotKey, that does just that though, so for me personally a clean implementation would be nice, but not high priority now. - Klaus ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki Post to : zim-wiki@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Zim-wiki] Next in index, on same level?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Klaus-Dieter Bauer bauer.klaus.die...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! Is there currently some function for jumping to the next entry in the index of the same herachy level? I organize my pages into a flat, date-based structure but sometimes I have e.g. technical details that logically belong to the page but are uninteresting when browsing through the notebook. Currently when using the next in index menu item, the detail subpage(s) will be included. Afraid not, but would be easy to make. Not sure if we should either change the behavior of the current key binding, or add a new one. The same problem applies to the default behaviour of expanding the tree when visiting a page.When I want to browse through the summary pages, I'd rather leave the tree folded as much as possible unless explicitly needing the details; Most of the time the subtree is just an unnecessary distraction, especially since the attachment directory may contain folders that are no pages at all (but show up in the tree). Afraid currently that is hardcoded. Coul dmake it optional, or could make the tree fold again after going to the next page. Point is that by fully disabling it, you have no direct view of sub-pages for cases where you do use them actively. Regards, Jaap ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki Post to : zim-wiki@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Zim-wiki] Next in index, on same level?
Hello! Is there currently some function for jumping to the next entry in the index of the same herachy level? I organize my pages into a flat, date-based structure but sometimes I have e.g. technical details that logically belong to the page but are uninteresting when browsing through the notebook. Currently when using the next in index menu item, the detail subpage(s) will be included. The same problem applies to the default behaviour of expanding the tree when visiting a page.When I want to browse through the summary pages, I'd rather leave the tree folded as much as possible unless explicitly needing the details; Most of the time the subtree is just an unnecessary distraction, especially since the attachment directory may contain folders that are no pages at all (but show up in the tree). kind regards, Klaus ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki Post to : zim-wiki@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
