[ZION] 34 U.S. Senators would nix Marriage Amendment

2004-03-05 Thread Steven Montgomery
According to Newsmax and unnamed published reports, at least 34 U.S. 
Senators would vote no on the Marriage Amendment:

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/5/95800.shtml

What stand a better chance is to limit the jurisdiction of Federal 
Courts--something that only takes a simple majority, rather than a 2/3 
majority of both House and Senate and then 3/4 of the States.

--
Steven Montgomery
The most important consequence of marriage is, that
the husband and the wife become in law only one
person Upon this principle of union, almost all the
other legal consequences of marriage depend. This
principle, sublime and refined, deserves to be viewed
and examined on every side. —James Wilson
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
--^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
--^



Re: [ZION] 34 U.S. Senators would nix Marriage Amendment

2004-03-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
Steven Montgomery wrote:
According to Newsmax and unnamed published reports, at least 34 U.S. 
Senators would vote no on the Marriage Amendment:

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/5/95800.shtml

What stand a better chance is to limit the jurisdiction of Federal 
Courts--something that only takes a simple majority, rather than a 2/3 
majority of both House and Senate and then 3/4 of the States.
I continue to feel that we should do both:  pass a federal marriage 
amendment if we can, and pass legislation limiting the jurisdiction of the 
Federal Courts.  I don't think we should assume up front that an amendment 
is politically impossible.  And we should remember that what can be done 
with a simple majority can be undone with a simple majority.  If an 
amendment would be harder to pass, it would also be much harder to repeal.

John W. Redelfs[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
The traditional family is under heavy attack. I do not know
that things were worse in the times of Sodom and Gomorrah.
-- President Gordon B. Hinckley, 2004.
=
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
--^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
--^