[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-272) getChildren can fail for large numbers of children

2009-02-02 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12669570#action_12669570
 ] 

Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-272:
--

Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #217 (See 
[http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/217/])


 getChildren can fail for large numbers of children
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-272
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Joshua Tuberville
Assignee: Mahadev konar
 Fix For: 3.1.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-272.patch


 Zookeeper allows creation of an abritrary number of children, yet if the 
 String array of children names exceeds 4,194,304 bytes a getChildren will 
 fail because ClientCnxn$SendThread.readLength() throws an exception on line 
 490.  Mahadev Konar questioned this byte limit's need.  In any case 
 consistency of create children, get children should exist.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-272) getChildren can fail for large numbers of children

2009-01-29 Thread Nitay Joffe (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12668371#action_12668371
 ] 

Nitay Joffe commented on ZOOKEEPER-272:
---

What about having getChildren() return an IteratorString instead of a 
ListString? Using such an abstraction allows us to put the implementation 
details of what walking the list children mean inside ZooKeeper instead of 
client code. With an Iterator we can make the next() call handle the multiple 
offset getChildren() calls under the hood, rather than put this burden on the 
client. Furthermore, if we have, say, some compressed protocol, a lot of 
space/cpu can be saved by only decompressing/storing the current child being 
worked on.

 getChildren can fail for large numbers of children
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-272
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Joshua Tuberville
Assignee: Mahadev konar
 Fix For: 3.1.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-272.patch


 Zookeeper allows creation of an abritrary number of children, yet if the 
 String array of children names exceeds 4,194,304 bytes a getChildren will 
 fail because ClientCnxn$SendThread.readLength() throws an exception on line 
 490.  Mahadev Konar questioned this byte limit's need.  In any case 
 consistency of create children, get children should exist.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-272) getChildren can fail for large numbers of children

2009-01-29 Thread Mahadev konar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12668373#action_12668373
 ] 

Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-272:
-

sorry i should have mentioned this earlier. I planned to open a jira for 
exactly what you mentioned above.  Thsi fix is a quick fix for the upcoming 
release.

 getChildren can fail for large numbers of children
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-272
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Joshua Tuberville
Assignee: Mahadev konar
 Fix For: 3.1.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-272.patch


 Zookeeper allows creation of an abritrary number of children, yet if the 
 String array of children names exceeds 4,194,304 bytes a getChildren will 
 fail because ClientCnxn$SendThread.readLength() throws an exception on line 
 490.  Mahadev Konar questioned this byte limit's need.  In any case 
 consistency of create children, get children should exist.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-272) getChildren can fail for large numbers of children

2009-01-29 Thread Joshua Tuberville (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12668532#action_12668532
 ] 

Joshua Tuberville commented on ZOOKEEPER-272:
-

Consider returning IterableString instead of IteratorString so you can take 
advantage of Java 5 foreach idiom

for (String child : foo.getChildren()) {

// Something done with child

}

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Iterable.html



 getChildren can fail for large numbers of children
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-272
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Joshua Tuberville
Assignee: Mahadev konar
 Fix For: 3.1.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-272.patch


 Zookeeper allows creation of an abritrary number of children, yet if the 
 String array of children names exceeds 4,194,304 bytes a getChildren will 
 fail because ClientCnxn$SendThread.readLength() throws an exception on line 
 490.  Mahadev Konar questioned this byte limit's need.  In any case 
 consistency of create children, get children should exist.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-272) getChildren can fail for large numbers of children

2009-01-29 Thread Benjamin Reed (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12668652#action_12668652
 ] 

Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-272:
-

This is a good comment, but it should be tracked in a separate Jira.

 getChildren can fail for large numbers of children
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-272
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Joshua Tuberville
Assignee: Mahadev konar
 Fix For: 3.1.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-272.patch


 Zookeeper allows creation of an abritrary number of children, yet if the 
 String array of children names exceeds 4,194,304 bytes a getChildren will 
 fail because ClientCnxn$SendThread.readLength() throws an exception on line 
 490.  Mahadev Konar questioned this byte limit's need.  In any case 
 consistency of create children, get children should exist.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-272) getChildren can fail for large numbers of children

2009-01-13 Thread Benjamin Reed (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12663418#action_12663418
 ] 

Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-272:
-

I think there are two stages to fixing this problem. First we should make that 
line of code use BinaryInputArchive.maxBuffer, so that it can be configured. 
Then we should probably add a version of getChildren that takes and returns an 
offset, so that getChildren could be called multiple times to get all of the 
children.

 getChildren can fail for large numbers of children
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-272
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Joshua Tuberville

 Zookeeper allows creation of an abritrary number of children, yet if the 
 String array of children names exceeds 4,194,304 bytes a getChildren will 
 fail because ClientCnxn$SendThread.readLength() throws an exception on line 
 490.  Mahadev Konar questioned this byte limit's need.  In any case 
 consistency of create children, get children should exist.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-272) getChildren can fail for large numbers of children

2009-01-13 Thread Mahadev konar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12663422#action_12663422
 ] 

Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-272:
-

returning an offset for getchildren is a good suggestion should we just fix 
the limit in this jira and open another one for getchildren returning an offset 
? fixing the limit would be easir to do and can be a part of 3.1 release.


 getChildren can fail for large numbers of children
 --

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-272
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-272
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Joshua Tuberville

 Zookeeper allows creation of an abritrary number of children, yet if the 
 String array of children names exceeds 4,194,304 bytes a getChildren will 
 fail because ClientCnxn$SendThread.readLength() throws an exception on line 
 490.  Mahadev Konar questioned this byte limit's need.  In any case 
 consistency of create children, get children should exist.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.