[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-05-09 Thread Henry Robinson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865639#action_12865639
 ] 

Henry Robinson commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
--

Hi Aaron - 

The great thing about open source, and the relatively permissive Apache license 
in particular, is that Chris is free to copy any and all of ZK into github and 
continue with a development process that he finds more agreeable. It is 
completely kosher to do this. As Chris says, you are welcome to contribute, 
fork or ignore it. 

As far as I am concerned, contrib is an excellent place to put projects that 
directly add more functionality to their parent project (the language bindings 
and this patch are good examples), but not a great place to store standalone 
projects that simply leverage the parent (an example might be a DNS server, 
written in ZooKeeper). This is a needfully vague distinction, and others will 
have different opinions.

I do not know specifically to what Chris is referring when he talks about an 
'onerous' patch process, but I speculate he might mean that the role of 
'committer' - someone who is gating the submission of patches - makes it harder 
to get your patches available for others to use quickly. Of course there are 
also benefits of this approach, such as a ready collection of experienced users 
on hand to offer advice and the relatively high standard for patches to be 
accepted to trunk arguably improves code quality. What's great is the two 
development styles are not mutually exclusive, and can, ideally, benefit from 
each other. If you are having difficulties with, or are frustrated by, the 
patch submission process here, ask for help. The community here is very happy 
to help, and we'll do what we can to address pain points. 

As for this patch, I'm happy it's going into contrib - users sometimes find 
ZooKeeper difficult to program to, and examples and new abstractions are always 
welcome. Keeping this patch in the main repository means that newcomers to 
ZooKeeper will find it more easily. Thanks for the contribution!

Henry

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-05-08 Thread Chris K Wensel (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865523#action_12865523
 ] 

Chris K Wensel commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
--

actually, I went ahead and threw this on github

http://github.com/cwensel/ztree

the tests don't compile or run as they depend on un-jarred zk test classes, but 
there is a build file that will create a simple jar.

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-05-08 Thread Aaron Crow (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865526#action_12865526
 ] 

Aaron Crow commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
--

Hi Chris, my apologies, I haven't had much time to continue with this patch. I 
kind of got held up by the combination of limited time, and apparently being 
required to engineer a standalone build for the patch. 

This is actually my first significant contribution, so I'm feeling a little 
lost at this point. Is it kosher to move patches out of zk contrib and into 
independent repos? And what would make it easer to collaborate on in github vs. 
the main zk project?

Many thanks for your interest and time...

Aaron

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-05-08 Thread Chris K Wensel (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865527#action_12865527
 ] 

Chris K Wensel commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
--

Its more of a mater of what's more utilitarian. Your code can be locked up into 
the apache repo where only mods must be submitted as patch files, or in github 
where people can branch/fork/merge at will. 

note that some projects are doing away with contrib folders since most of the 
contributions either become abandoned (partly because patch process is too 
onerous) or are very immature and buggy.

the code is now in github, you can choose to fork it and modify it. or ignore 
it.

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-05-08 Thread Aaron Crow (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865540#action_12865540
 ] 

Aaron Crow commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
--

Hi Mahadev, apologies for the delayed response. Yes you're right, I didn't 
include a build.xml file. I'm really sorry, just haven't found the time to put 
all that together. 

Related, it's interesting to me what Chris is saying about abandoned (partly 
because patch process is too onerous). When I had the patch in the main 
project, it was pretty easy to get it running with the main project's test 
framework. As a standalone contrib, however, I felt kinda stymied because 
there's real overhead in putting everything together.

Any thoughts from your end on the github approach vs. main project?

Thanks for all your time and help with the patch...


Aaron

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-05-07 Thread Chris K Wensel (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12865354#action_12865354
 ] 

Chris K Wensel commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
--

wondering if this would be better served as a github project so it can be 
collaborated on much easier.

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-05-04 Thread Mahadev konar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12864043#action_12864043
 ] 

Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
-

+1 the patch looks good 

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-05-04 Thread Mahadev konar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12864047#action_12864047
 ] 

Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
-

aah just noticed that the src/ztree is missing a build.xml. Did you forget to 
add a build.xml to the ztree package aaron?

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-04-24 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12860597#action_12860597
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
-

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440561/ZOOKEEPER-679.patch
  against trunk revision 936624.

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/72/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/72/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/72/console

This message is automatically generated.

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-04-24 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12860608#action_12860608
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
-

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442757/ZOOKEEPER-679.patch
  against trunk revision 936624.

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/73/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/73/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/73/console

This message is automatically generated.

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-04-13 Thread Mahadev konar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856642#action_12856642
 ] 

Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
-

aaron,
  i was looking at the patch. I think we should move the source and the tests 
to src/contrib/ztree. It would be more appropriate as a contrib module. Do you 
want to upload a new patch with this as a contrib module. Please take a look at 
src/contrib on how to make this as a contrib module.



 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, 
 ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-04-01 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12852612#action_12852612
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
-

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440556/ZOOKEEPER-679.patch
  against trunk revision 929564.

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/42/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/42/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/42/console

This message is automatically generated.

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: contrib, java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Assignee: Aaron Crow
 Fix For: 3.4.0

 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch, ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-679) Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.

2010-02-24 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12837960#action_12837960
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-679:
-

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12436892/ZOOKEEPER-679.patch
  against trunk revision 915466.

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

-1 findbugs.  The patch appears to cause Findbugs to fail.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed core unit tests.

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h8.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/123/testReport/
Console output: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Zookeeper-Patch-h8.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/123/console

This message is automatically generated.

 Offers a node design for interacting with the Java Zookeeper client.
 

 Key: ZOOKEEPER-679
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
 Project: Zookeeper
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: java client, tests
Reporter: Aaron Crow
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-679.patch


 Following up on my conversations with Patrick and Mahadev 
 (http://n2.nabble.com/Might-I-contribute-a-Node-design-for-the-Java-API-td4567695.html#a4567695).
 This patch includes the implementation as well as unit tests. The first unit 
 test gives a simple high level demo of using the node API.
 The current implementation is simple and is only what I need withe current 
 project I am working on. However, I am very open to any and all suggestions 
 for improvement.
 This is a proposal to support a simplified node (or File) like API into a 
 Zookeeper tree, by wrapping the Zookeeper Java client. It is similar to 
 Java's File API design.
 Although, I'm trying to make it easier in a few spots. For example, deleting 
 a Node recursively is done by default. I also lean toward resolving 
 Exceptions under the hood when it seems appropriate. For example, if you 
 ask a Node if it exists, and its parent doesn't even exist, you just get a 
 false back (rather than a nasty Exception).
 As for watches and ephemeral nodes, my current work does not need these 
 things so I currently have no handling of them. But if potential users of  
 the Node a.k.a. File design want these things, I'd be open to supporting 
 them as reasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.