[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/ Integration branch for Dieter's Haufe legacy

2009-05-10 Thread Andreas Jung
Log message for revision 99820:
  Integration branch for Dieter's Haufe legacy
  

Changed:
  A   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/

-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/ - Launchpad #373621: catching and logging exceptions that could cause

2009-05-10 Thread Andreas Jung
Log message for revision 99821:
  - Launchpad #373621: catching and logging exceptions that could cause
leaking of worker threads
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
  U   
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/ZServer/PubCore/ZServerPublisher.py

-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
15:14:02 UTC (rev 99820)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
15:22:15 UTC (rev 99821)
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
 Features Added
 ++
 
+- Launchpad #373621: catching and logging exceptions that could cause
+  leaking of worker threads
+
 - zExceptions.convertExceptionType:  new API, breaking out conversion of
   exception names to exception types from 'upgradeException'.
 

Modified: 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/ZServer/PubCore/ZServerPublisher.py
===
--- 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/ZServer/PubCore/ZServerPublisher.py  
2009-05-10 15:14:02 UTC (rev 99820)
+++ 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/ZServer/PubCore/ZServerPublisher.py  
2009-05-10 15:22:15 UTC (rev 99821)
@@ -11,11 +11,17 @@
 #
 ##
 
+import logging
+
+LOG = logging.getLogger('ZServerPublisher')
+
 class ZServerPublisher:
 def __init__(self, accept):
+from sys import exc_info
 from ZPublisher import publish_module
 from ZPublisher.WSGIPublisher import publish_module as publish_wsgi
 while 1:
+  try:
 name, a, b=accept()
 if name == Zope2:
 try:
@@ -36,3 +42,5 @@
 # TODO: Support keeping connections open.
 a['wsgi.output']._close = 1
 a['wsgi.output'].close()
+  except:
+LOG.error('exception caught', exc_info=True)

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg Added zope.principalregistry to the KGS, the package turns up as a dependency somewhere

2009-05-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Log message for revision 99822:
  Added zope.principalregistry to the KGS, the package turns up as a dependency 
somewhere
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/trunk/versions.cfg

-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2009-05-10 15:22:15 UTC (rev 99821)
+++ Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2009-05-10 15:22:55 UTC (rev 99822)
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@
 zope.password = 3.5.1
 zope.pagetemplate = 3.4.2
 zope.principalannotation = 3.6.0
+zope.principalregistry = 3.7.0
 zope.proxy = 3.5.0
 zope.publisher = 3.6.4
 zope.schema = 3.5.4

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/ - Launchpad #373621: catching and logging exceptions that could cause

2009-05-10 Thread Andreas Jung
Log message for revision 99823:
  
  - Launchpad #373621: catching and logging exceptions that could cause
leaking of worker threads
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Zope2/Startup/__init__.py

-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
15:22:55 UTC (rev 99822)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
15:28:15 UTC (rev 99823)
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
 - Launchpad #373621: catching and logging exceptions that could cause
   leaking of worker threads
 
+- Launchpad #373577: setting up standard logging earlier within the startup
+  phase for improving the analysis of startup errors
+
 - zExceptions.convertExceptionType:  new API, breaking out conversion of
   exception names to exception types from 'upgradeException'.
 

Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Zope2/Startup/__init__.py
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Zope2/Startup/__init__.py
2009-05-10 15:22:55 UTC (rev 99822)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Zope2/Startup/__init__.py
2009-05-10 15:28:15 UTC (rev 99823)
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
 self.setupServers()
 # drop privileges after setting up servers
 self.dropPrivileges()
+self.setupFinalLogging()
 self.makeLockFile()
 self.makePidFile()
 self.setupInterpreter()
@@ -100,7 +101,6 @@
 # after it has emitted ZServer messages.
 
 logger.info('Ready to handle requests')
-self.setupFinalLogging()
 self.sendEvents()
 
 def run(self):

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/ - Launchpad #373601: abort transaction before connection close in order to

2009-05-10 Thread Andreas Jung
Log message for revision 99824:
  
  - Launchpad #373601: abort transaction before connection close in order to
prevent connection leaks in case of persistent changes after the main
transaction is closed.
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/App/ZApplication.py

-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
15:28:15 UTC (rev 99823)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
15:33:08 UTC (rev 99824)
@@ -24,11 +24,15 @@
 ++
 
 - Launchpad #373621: catching and logging exceptions that could cause
-  leaking of worker threads
+  leaking of worker threads.
 
 - Launchpad #373577: setting up standard logging earlier within the startup
-  phase for improving the analysis of startup errors
+  phase for improving the analysis of startup errors.
 
+- Launchpad #373601: abort transaction before connection close in order to
+  prevent connection leaks in case of persistent changes after the main
+  transaction is closed.
+
 - zExceptions.convertExceptionType:  new API, breaking out conversion of
   exception names to exception types from 'upgradeException'.
 

Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/App/ZApplication.py
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/App/ZApplication.py  
2009-05-10 15:28:15 UTC (rev 99823)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/App/ZApplication.py  
2009-05-10 15:33:08 UTC (rev 99824)
@@ -80,4 +80,5 @@
 self._jar = jar
 
 def __del__(self):
+transaction.abort()
 self._jar.close()

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/ - Launchpad #373583: ZODBMountPoint - fixed broken mount support and

2009-05-10 Thread Andreas Jung
Log message for revision 99825:
  - Launchpad #373583: ZODBMountPoint - fixed broken mount support and 
extended the test suite.
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
  U   
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Products/ZODBMountPoint/MountedObject.py
  U   
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Products/ZODBMountPoint/tests/testMountPoint.py

-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
15:33:08 UTC (rev 99824)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
15:58:44 UTC (rev 99825)
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
 Features Added
 ++
 
+- Launchpad #373583: ZODBMountPoint - fixed broken mount support and 
+  extended the test suite.
+
 - Launchpad #373621: catching and logging exceptions that could cause
   leaking of worker threads.
 

Modified: 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Products/ZODBMountPoint/MountedObject.py
===
--- 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Products/ZODBMountPoint/MountedObject.py
 2009-05-10 15:33:08 UTC (rev 99824)
+++ 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Products/ZODBMountPoint/MountedObject.py
 2009-05-10 15:58:44 UTC (rev 99825)
@@ -59,9 +59,7 @@
 factory = guarded_getattr(dispatcher, 'manage_addFolder')
 factory(id)
 o = context.restrictedTraverse(id)
-# Commit a subtransaction to assign the new object to
-# the correct database.
-transaction.savepoint(optimistic=True)
+context._p_jar.add(o.aq_base)
 return o
 
 def traverseOrConstruct(self, path, omit_final=0):

Modified: 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Products/ZODBMountPoint/tests/testMountPoint.py
===
--- 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Products/ZODBMountPoint/tests/testMountPoint.py
  2009-05-10 15:33:08 UTC (rev 99824)
+++ 
Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/Products/ZODBMountPoint/tests/testMountPoint.py
  2009-05-10 15:58:44 UTC (rev 99825)
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
 databases = [TestDBConfig('test_main.fs', ['/']).getDB(),
  TestDBConfig('test_mount1.fs', ['/mount1']).getDB(),
  TestDBConfig('test_mount2.fs', ['/mount2']).getDB(),
+ TestDBConfig('test_mount3.fs', ['/i/mount3']).getDB(),
  ]
 mount_points = {}
 mount_factories = {}
@@ -102,13 +103,21 @@
 root = conn.root()
 root['Application'] = app = Application()
 self.app = app
+install_products(app, 'ZCatalog', 'PluginIndexes', 'OFSP')
+# login
+from AccessControl.User import system
+from AccessControl.SecurityManagement import newSecurityManager
+newSecurityManager(None, system)
 transaction.commit()  # Get app._p_jar set
-manage_addMounts(app, ('/mount1', '/mount2'))
+manage_addMounts(app, ('/mount1', '/mount2', '/i/mount3'))
 transaction.commit()  # Get the mount points ready
 
 
 
 def tearDown(self):
+# logout
+from AccessControl.SecurityManagement import noSecurityManager
+noSecurityManager()
 App.config.setConfiguration(original_config)
 transaction.abort()
 self.app._p_jar.close()
@@ -120,6 +129,7 @@
 def testRead(self):
 self.assertEqual(self.app.mount1.id, 'mount1')
 self.assertEqual(self.app.mount2.id, 'mount2')
+self.assertEqual(self.app.i.mount3.id, 'mount3')
 
 def testWrite(self):
 app = self.app
@@ -144,6 +154,7 @@
 self.assertEqual(getMountPoint(self.app.mount1)._path, '/mount1')
 self.assert_(getMountPoint(self.app.mount2) is not None)
 self.assertEqual(getMountPoint(self.app.mount2)._path, '/mount2')
+self.assertEqual(getMountPoint(self.app.i.mount3)._path, '/i/mount3')
 del self.app.mount2
 self.app.mount2 = Folder()
 self.app.mount2.id = 'mount2'
@@ -160,8 +171,13 @@
 {'status': 'Ok',
  'path': '/mount2',
  'name': 'test_mount2.fs',
- 'exists': 1}]
-self.assertEqual(expected, status)
+ 'exists': 1},
+{'status': 'Ok',
+ 'path': '/i/mount3',
+ 'name': 'test_mount3.fs',
+ 'exists': 1},
+]
+self.assertEqual(sorted(expected), sorted(status))
 del self.app.mount2
 status = manage_getMountStatus(self.app)
 expected = [{'status': 'Ok',
@@ -171,8 +187,14 @@
 {'status': 'Ready to create',
  'path': '/mount2',
  'name': 'test_mount2.fs',

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/ - Launchpad #373658: traversal using (un)restrictedTraverse

2009-05-10 Thread Andreas Jung
Log message for revision 99829:
  
  - Launchpad #373658: traversal using (un)restrictedTraverse 
no longer depends no the existence of a request 
  
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/OFS/Traversable.py

-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
16:14:42 UTC (rev 99828)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
19:12:43 UTC (rev 99829)
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
 Features Added
 ++
 
+- Launchpad #373658: traversal using (un)restrictedTraverse 
+  no longer depends no the existence of a request 
+
 - Launchpad #373583: ZODBMountPoint - fixed broken mount support and 
   extended the test suite.
 

Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/OFS/Traversable.py
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/OFS/Traversable.py   
2009-05-10 16:14:42 UTC (rev 99828)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/OFS/Traversable.py   
2009-05-10 19:12:43 UTC (rev 99829)
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@
 path = list(path)
 
 REQUEST = {'TraversalRequestNameStack': path}
+web_request = getattr(self, 'REQUEST', None)
 path.reverse()
 path_pop = path.pop
 
@@ -198,7 +199,7 @@
 ns, nm = nsParse(name)
 try:
 next = namespaceLookup(
-ns, nm, obj, aq_acquire(self, 'REQUEST'))
+ns, nm, obj, web_request).__of__(obj)
 if IAcquirer.providedBy(next):
 next = next.__of__(obj)
 if restricted and not validate(
@@ -264,7 +265,7 @@
 
 except (AttributeError, NotFound, KeyError), e:
 # Try to look for a view
-next = queryMultiAdapter((obj, aq_acquire(self, 
'REQUEST')),
+next = queryMultiAdapter((obj, web_request),
  Interface, name)
 
 if next is not None:

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/ reverted last checkin (breaking tests)

2009-05-10 Thread Andreas Jung
Log message for revision 99831:
  reverted last checkin (breaking tests) 
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
  U   Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/OFS/Traversable.py

-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-10 
23:52:35 UTC (rev 99830)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/doc/CHANGES.rst  2009-05-11 
04:25:37 UTC (rev 99831)
@@ -23,9 +23,6 @@
 Features Added
 ++
 
-- Launchpad #373658: traversal using (un)restrictedTraverse 
-  no longer depends no the existence of a request 
-
 - Launchpad #373583: ZODBMountPoint - fixed broken mount support and 
   extended the test suite.
 

Modified: Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/OFS/Traversable.py
===
--- Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/OFS/Traversable.py   
2009-05-10 23:52:35 UTC (rev 99830)
+++ Zope/branches/haufe-legacy-integration/src/OFS/Traversable.py   
2009-05-11 04:25:37 UTC (rev 99831)
@@ -154,7 +154,6 @@
 path = list(path)
 
 REQUEST = {'TraversalRequestNameStack': path}
-web_request = getattr(self, 'REQUEST', None)
 path.reverse()
 path_pop = path.pop
 
@@ -199,7 +198,7 @@
 ns, nm = nsParse(name)
 try:
 next = namespaceLookup(
-ns, nm, obj, web_request).__of__(obj)
+ns, nm, obj, aq_acquire(self, 'REQUEST'))
 if IAcquirer.providedBy(next):
 next = next.__of__(obj)
 if restricted and not validate(
@@ -265,7 +264,7 @@
 
 except (AttributeError, NotFound, KeyError), e:
 # Try to look for a view
-next = queryMultiAdapter((obj, web_request),
+next = queryMultiAdapter((obj, aq_acquire(self, 
'REQUEST')),
  Interface, name)
 
 if next is not None:

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


Re: [Zope-dev] Using views for exceptions in Zope 2.12?

2009-05-10 Thread Laurence Rowe
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
 On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
 Hmm, so I would I register different views for a KeyError versus an
 AttributeError?
 
 I believe you need to make KeyError implement an interface to be able
 to register a view for it. What use would be a view for KeyError
 anyway. *wink*
 

It's perfectly possible to register a view for a class instead of an 
interface. (Not that I am familiar with the new views for errors stuff).

Laurence

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Using views for exceptions in Zope 2.12?

2009-05-10 Thread Jim Fulton

On May 9, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Chris Withers wrote:

 Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 Try following the description given in the changelog at
 http://svn.zope.org/Zope/branches/2.11/doc/CHANGES.txt?view=markup  
 under
 Zope 3-based exception views.

 Hmm, so I would I register different views for a KeyError versus an
 AttributeError?


Not unless you actually need different views for them, which you  
probably don't.

In my experience, you only need a few, as described in change notes.   
One additional one that isn't mentioned in the change notes but that I  
use a lot is UserError (zope.exceptions.UserError).  This is an  
exception to raise when you want to display an end-user error message.

Most exceptions are really application errors and should be handled by  
a view for Exception that displays a system error message.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 8 OK

2009-05-10 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sat May  9 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun May 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May  9 20:53:51 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011667.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May  9 20:55:52 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011668.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May  9 20:57:53 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011669.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May  9 20:59:53 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011670.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May  9 21:01:53 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011671.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May  9 21:04:03 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011672.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May  9 21:06:03 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011673.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May  9 21:08:04 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011674.html

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] ZTK futures: one big package?

2009-05-10 Thread Chris McDonough
I was just thinking about the future of the ZTK, and in the past I have 
argued 
for not attempting to version the entire set of packages that currently 
comprises Zope 3 over time as ZTK releases.  Instead, I have argued for 
promoting packages that have some life of their own (independent of the rest of 
the pile) into subprojects that have their own release cycles.  Then outside 
projects such as Plone and Grok could depend on independent versions of such 
packages, giving them slightly more flexibility than requiring a version of 
the 
ZTK.

Given that this suggestion has been met with skepticism, let me try another 
tact.  Instead of thinking about it this way, could we think about it as 
*deflating* the current set of zope.* packages that do not currently have a 
meaningful life of their own into a single setuptools distribution named ZTK. 
  This package would include most everything in zope.app*, plus things like 
zope.server, zope.publisher, and other things that just aren't useful outside 
of 
Zope-the-appserver, or which currently just depend on too much.

This ZTK distribution would *not* include packages that already have a life 
of 
their own outside Zope such as zope.interface, zope.component, 
zope.configuration, zope.proxy, ZODB, etc.  These packages would continue to 
have their own release cycles.

Over time, we'd tease out the dependencies of packages that live in the ZTK 
distribution, making them useful outside without any dependency on the ZTK.  
The 
names of these packages could be arbitrary (they wouldn't need to retain their 
old zope.* names).  Some backwards dependency shims would be added to the ZTK 
to prevent old imports from breaking, and the ZTK distribution would then just 
have a dependency on the thing that got broken out.

I'm thinking that this would simplify things greatly for people who want to be 
consumers of truly independent Zope packages.  There'd be exactly N of them 
available for download (where N is much less than 100, more like 20), plus the 
ZTK, which would have the rest of the pile in it over time.  If someone wanted 
to use a forked version of a package that lived in the ZTK distribution, they'd 
either do so by teasing out the dependencies and making it truly independent 
or they'd just reroll a custom version of the entire ZTK distribution.

Does this make any sense?

- C


- C
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK futures: one big package?

2009-05-10 Thread Chris Withers
Chris McDonough wrote:
 Given that this suggestion has been met with skepticism, let me try another 
 tact.  Instead of thinking about it this way, could we think about it as 
 *deflating* the current set of zope.* packages that do not currently have a 
 meaningful life of their own into a single setuptools distribution named 
 ZTK. 
 
 This ZTK distribution would *not* include packages that already have a life 
 of 
 their own outside Zope such as zope.interface, zope.component, 
 zope.configuration, zope.proxy, ZODB, etc.  These packages would continue to 
 have their own release cycles.

Yay! Big +1 from me...

 Over time, we'd tease out the dependencies of packages that live in the ZTK 
 distribution, making them useful outside without any dependency on the ZTK.  
 The 
 names of these packages could be arbitrary (they wouldn't need to retain 
 their 
 old zope.* names).  Some backwards dependency shims would be added to the 
 ZTK 
 to prevent old imports from breaking, and the ZTK distribution would then 
 just 
 have a dependency on the thing that got broken out.

Well, if they just used their old zope.* names, no shims would be 
needed, right? If it works, don't break it so it doesn't work ;-)

 I'm thinking that this would simplify things greatly for people who want to 
 be 
 consumers of truly independent Zope packages.  There'd be exactly N of them 
 available for download (where N is much less than 100, more like 20), plus 
 the 
 ZTK, which would have the rest of the pile in it over time.  If someone 
 wanted 
 to use a forked version of a package that lived in the ZTK distribution, 
 they'd 
 either do so by teasing out the dependencies and making it truly 
 independent 
 or they'd just reroll a custom version of the entire ZTK distribution.
 
 Does this make any sense?

yes, totally in agreement.

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope  Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK futures: one big package?

2009-05-10 Thread Chris McDonough
On 5/10/09 8:50 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
 Over time, we'd tease out the dependencies of packages that live in
 the ZTK distribution, making them useful outside without any
 dependency on the ZTK. The names of these packages could be arbitrary
 (they wouldn't need to retain their old zope.* names). Some
 backwards dependency shims would be added to the ZTK to prevent old
 imports from breaking, and the ZTK distribution would then just have a
 dependency on the thing that got broken out.

 Well, if they just used their old zope.* names, no shims would be
 needed, right? If it works, don't break it so it doesn't work ;-)

When possible, sure.  The situation I'm thinking about in particular when 
suggesting that we could rename some things is that the current *structure* of 
packaging is pretty messed up in some cases (zope.publisher vs. 
zope.app.publisher, or z3c.form vs. zope.formlib, for instance).  It might make 
sense to reshuffle code around that currently lives in separate packages into a 
single more external logical library or framework that might have aspects of 
all 
of the individual packages without needing to carry along the baggage of the 
old 
packaging structure.  When we move it out, it could have an arbitrary name and 
an arbitrary structure; shims could exist in the old locations within the ZTK 
to 
keep old code running.

- C
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope] need help importing python class into zope 2.11.2

2009-05-10 Thread Dganit David
HI 

 

I'm new to zope and python, I wrote some basic python class and a test
program using this class.

The  script is working  fine when running python from  command line.

 

Now I want to uses this class  inside zope,

I tried to create  the script, but it failed with the following error. 

Line 5: __init__ is an invalid variable name because it starts with
_

 

Can I write a constructor with different name?

Please advice what is the correct why to import this class to zope

 

 

Thanks Dganit 

___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] need help importing python class into zope 2.11.2

2009-05-10 Thread Andreas Jung
On 10.05.09 14:48, Dganit David wrote:

 HI

  

 I’m new to zope and python, I wrote some basic python class and a test
 program using this class.

 The  script is working  fine when running python from  command line.

  

 Now I want to uses this class  inside zope,

 I tried to create  the script, but it failed with the following error.

 Line 5: __init__ is an invalid variable name because it starts with _

  

 Can I write a constructor with different name?

 Please advice what is the correct why to import this class to zope


PythonScripts are *not* a replacement for pure Python code.
PythonScripts are restricted. Class definitions belong into trusted code
(browser views, externals method or a Zope product).

http://docs.zope.org/zope2/zdgbook/

-aj
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd.  Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )