[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/ Updatee docutils = 0.8

2011-08-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Log message for revision 122542:
  Updatee docutils = 0.8
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
  U   Zope/trunk/versions.cfg

-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst  2011-08-11 14:46:28 UTC (rev 122541)
+++ Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst  2011-08-11 18:52:13 UTC (rev 122542)
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 - Updated distributions:
 
   - DateTime = 3.0b1
+  - docutils = 0.8
   - manuel = 1.5.0
 
 Restructuring

Modified: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2011-08-11 14:46:28 UTC (rev 122541)
+++ Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2011-08-11 18:52:13 UTC (rev 122542)
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 Products.StandardCacheManagers = 2.13.0
 
 # ZTK KGS overrides
+docutils = 0.8
 manuel = 1.5.0
 python-gettext = 1.1.1
 

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/src/OFS/Traversable.py Reintroduce an aq_inner into the getPhysicalPath code to fix test failures in CMF's discussion items

2011-08-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Log message for revision 122543:
  Reintroduce an aq_inner into the getPhysicalPath code to fix test failures in 
CMF's discussion items
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/trunk/src/OFS/Traversable.py

-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/OFS/Traversable.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/src/OFS/Traversable.py   2011-08-11 18:52:13 UTC (rev 122542)
+++ Zope/trunk/src/OFS/Traversable.py   2011-08-11 19:08:31 UTC (rev 122543)
@@ -137,10 +137,7 @@
 pid = p.getId()
 
 path = (pid, ) + path
-try:
-p = p.__parent__
-except AttributeError:
-p = None
+p = aq_parent(aq_inner(p))
 else:
 if IApplication.providedBy(p):
 path = ('', ) + path

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


Re: [Zope-dev] More information in case of ZCML conflict errors

2011-08-11 Thread Sylvain Viollon

Op 10 aug 2011, om 14:03 heeft Godefroid Chapelle het volgende geschreven:

   Hello,

 
 I bumped recently on the exact same issue.
 
 I totally agree with your statements.
 
 I think it is really worth changing the message issued by the 
 configuration conflict errors.
 
 I hope I will be able to work on this in the coming weeks.
 
 Sylvain, I'll let you know.
 

  Great ! I don't think it is complicated, all the information is already there.

  Regards,

  Sylvain,


-- 
Sylvain Viollon -- Infrae
t +31 10 243 7051 -- http://infrae.com
Hoevestraat 10 3033GC Rotterdam -- The Netherlands



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 35, UNKNOWN: 2

2011-08-11 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2011-08-10 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-08-11 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received


   Bluebream / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
   Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
   Bluebream / Python2.6.5 64bit linux
[1]FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
[2]UNKNOWN : winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
   ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
   ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
   ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
[3]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
[4]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[5]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
   Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
   Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
   Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[6]winbot / zope.app.interface_py_265_32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64
[7]winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--

[1]UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048023.html


[2]UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048002.html


[3]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048011.html


[4]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048012.html


[5]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048013.html


[6]FAILED  winbot / zope.app.interface_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048015.html


[7]FAILED  winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048026.html


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope] project upon zope

2011-08-11 Thread Christian Staffa
hi zopeusers :)

I hope u can help me. I have to code a project and need advice. The thing is, i 
have to implement a simple accounting system and fristly i thought to use a Qt 
GUI with a mysql db server to realize it unless i stumpled upon zope. Then i 
began to read the documentation and i realized that zope is powerful. And now i 
want to use zope for this project but i am struggling with the implementation. 
anyway i am an experienced gentoo user with C/C++ skills, so my web development 
skills are not so matured :(

Ok as i told before i have to implement a simple user account system. user 
visit a course and i have to track if a user have visited all the hours, which 
is given by the courses definition. 

First i thought to use mysql to store the data in an rdbms but anyway i could 
use zodb, couldnt i? i dont know whats better and maybe u can give me an advice 
or u say no, that not a goob idea; its better to. so i dont know if i am 
right to get to grips with zope or better use conventional gui programming for 
it.

btw sorry for me english; i know its grammatically not so good.

i apprectiate your comments; thanks in advance.

chris
-- 
NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!   
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] project upon zope

2011-08-11 Thread Jel Coward
On 11 August 2011 15:39, Christian Staffa christian.sta...@gmx.de wrote:



 Ok as i told before i have to implement a simple user account system. user
 visit a course and i have to track if a user have visited all the hours,
 which is given by the courses definition.


Have you looked at moodle?

Jel





 First i thought to use mysql to store the data in an rdbms but anyway i
 could use zodb, couldnt i? i dont know whats better and maybe u can give me
 an advice or u say no, that not a goob idea; its better to. so i dont know
 if i am right to get to grips with zope or better use conventional gui
 programming for it.

 btw sorry for me english; i know its grammatically not so good.

 i apprectiate your comments; thanks in advance.

 chris
 --
 NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!
 Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
 ___
 Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
 **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
 (Related lists -
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
 After the wrapping, the discussion item has the wrong path. Even though 
 self, the talkback object, has the correct path when calling 
 getPhysicalPath on it. I can't see anything overly stupid in the 
 DiscussionItem code, so there has to be an issue with that Zope 
 getPhysicalPath change. Reverting that one change in the current Zope trunk 
 fixes the tests.

Thanks for the thorough analysis!

I tracked this down to a missing aq_inner call in the new
getPhysicalPath and fixed that.

The ValueError: 'Access contents information' not found in inherited
permissions failures remain, which are next on my list.

Hanno
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-11 Thread Jens Vagelpohl

On Aug 11, 2011, at 21:10 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
 After the wrapping, the discussion item has the wrong path. Even though 
 self, the talkback object, has the correct path when calling 
 getPhysicalPath on it. I can't see anything overly stupid in the 
 DiscussionItem code, so there has to be an issue with that Zope 
 getPhysicalPath change. Reverting that one change in the current Zope trunk 
 fixes the tests.
 
 Thanks for the thorough analysis!
 
 I tracked this down to a missing aq_inner call in the new
 getPhysicalPath and fixed that.
 
 The ValueError: 'Access contents information' not found in inherited
 permissions failures remain, which are next on my list.

Thanks for taking the time, Hanno. I wouldn't have been able to figure than one 
out.

jens



___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
 On Aug 11, 2011, at 21:10 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 I tracked this down to a missing aq_inner call in the new
 getPhysicalPath and fixed that.
 Thanks for taking the time, Hanno. I wouldn't have been able to figure than 
 one out.

Any code that does manual __of__ wrapping is suspicious and suggests
there's Acquisition problems lurking somewhere - I just got lucky to
finding this one so fast ;)

 The ValueError: 'Access contents information' not found in inherited
 permissions failures remain, which are next on my list.

That's fixed as well.

The FS objects no longer have the Access contents information
permission. They only got that through the OFS.ZDOM base class, which
is gone in Zope 4.

Hanno
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-11 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08/11/2011 04:21 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:

 Any code that does manual __of__ wrapping is suspicious and suggests 
 there's Acquisition problems lurking somewhere - I just got lucky to 
 finding this one so fast ;)

Hanno, didn't you hear the song?  All you need is __of___ (DAH, dah,
dadah dum).  Seriously, if manual '__of__' wrapping breaks, it is a
sign that somebody was mucking with code they didn't really understand.
;)  In this case, I truly don't understand the impatience to scrap
acquisition:  it is doing *exactly* what is wanted here.

 The ValueError: 'Access contents information' not found in
 inherited permissions failures remain, which are next on my
 list.
 
 That's fixed as well.
 
 The FS objects no longer have the Access contents information 
 permission. They only got that through the OFS.ZDOM base class,
 which is gone in Zope 4.


Tres.
- -- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5EQRMACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ63xgCgjuFsRSEEgUd6TB7taO2IgJRx
tSwAn3YtFAVCoFL/3ijsYhMfoX1AzxU4
=Rs6q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests