You could now recommend W2k as a much more stable *than either 95 or NT4*
alternative that does USB support out of the box.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Capesius, Alan
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Zope] Re: Some help required but no sarcastic comments this
time pleas ee
I understand people do use Win9x, but I would always recommend NT 4
workstation over 9x unless there is an overpowering need for USB.
I don't use USB myself and have been using NT exclusively on the desktop
since 94. When properly configured it is much more stable. Nowadays, NT5
(oops 2000) is a better choice for USB support and about as stable as 9x.
But, that aside, I'm interested in your desktop uses for Zope. What sort of
apps?
From: Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are those of us who use Zope in desktop applications too (yes
really), where Win9x is not an unreasonable choice.
Toby Dickenson
___
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
___
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
