Re: [Zope] Multiple Browser Id Managers question
David H wrote at 2005-4-5 12:46 -0700: ... But I find that I *can* add additional Browser Id Managers in folders that can acquire the original browser id manager - without deleting the default copy in Zope root. Any thought ideas on this? Does the principal still stand, e.g. Not good to put a browser id manager in a place that can also acquire another browser id manager? Why would you like multiple BrowserIdManagers? A single instance is enough... -- Dieter ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Multiple Browser Id Managers question
Hi Zope List, The current SESSION Chapter in the Zope Book 2.7 says the following: ... once you've instantiated one browser id manager or if you keep the default browser id manager, you will not be able to instantiate another browser id manager in a place where the new browser id manager can acquire the original browser id manager via its containment path But I find that I *can* add additional Browser Id Managers in folders that can acquire the original browser id manager - without deleting the default copy in Zope root. Any thought ideas on this? Does the principal still stand, e.g. Not good to put a browser id manager in a place that can also acquire another browser id manager? Thanks, David ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Multiple Browser Id Managers question
That sentence in the Zope Book should likely be removed. It is inaccurate. It is possible to continue to add browser id managers wherever you'd like. Doing so doesn't do anything bad (except maybe confuse people). On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 15:46, David H wrote: Hi Zope List, The current SESSION Chapter in the Zope Book 2.7 says the following: ... once you've instantiated one browser id manager or if you keep the default browser id manager, you will not be able to instantiate another browser id manager in a place where the new browser id manager can acquire the original browser id manager via its containment path But I find that I *can* add additional Browser Id Managers in folders that can acquire the original browser id manager - without deleting the default copy in Zope root. Any thought ideas on this? Does the principal still stand, e.g. Not good to put a browser id manager in a place that can also acquire another browser id manager? Thanks, David ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
