Re: [Zope] Surprising load test results? (more results)

2006-10-10 Thread Pascal Peregrina
Well, I should have removed the SpeedPack results for clarity...
I might add these graphs today.

But basically, the worrying thing is the performance degradation with each
zope version... 2.8.8 seems to be the fastest, then 2.9, then 2.10... :(
(even if you forget about WSGI)

Pascal


 De : Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date : Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:46:39 +0200
 À : Pascal Peregrina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc : zope@zope.org zope@zope.org
 Objet : Re: [Zope] Surprising load test results? (more results)
 
 On 10/9/06, Pascal Peregrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I have added ab tests at the end of the page.
 (http://talk.lastminute.com/wiki/index.php/Loadtest)
 
 These extra results confirm everything we had found so far, except for 2.10
 with use-wsgi on... We could see what others reported: in 2.10, WSGI adds
 a similar overhead to all type of requests (html, gif, swf, ...). So there
 must have been something wrong in our initial test.
 
 Again, Zope 2.8.8 remains the fastest version...
 
 Something new that we could not see in the previous test is the evolution of
 the results with the number of concurrent threads, as we have done the same
 test with 1,2,5,10,20,50 and 100 threads.
 
 Well, as seen here the number of requests peak at around five threads,
 which is expected with Zopes default setting of four threads.
 
 Please have a look, and let me know what you think about these additional
 results.
 
 They seem to largely contractictyour earlier results, where the
 avergare response time for WSGI was similar for all document types.
 Now they are not. Also, this time, 2.10 without WSGI ends up somewhere
 between 2.9 and 2.10 with WSGI, while before 2.10 without WSGI was
 slightly slower (but not that much) than 2.9.
 
 So, basically, these tests are perhaps slightly less non-sensical than
 your earlier tests, but still surprising. I don't see why Zope 2.10
 would be so much slower than 2.9 in serving static content. There has
 been no change there. Your first test was much more reasonable in that
 area. This test is on the otehr hand much more reasonable for the WSGI
 results.
 
 -- 
 Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
 CPS Content Management http://www.nuxeo.org/



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


[Zope] Surprising load test results? (more results)

2006-10-09 Thread Pascal Peregrina
Hi all,

I have added ab tests at the end of the page.
(http://talk.lastminute.com/wiki/index.php/Loadtest)

These extra results confirm everything we had found so far, except for 2.10
with use-wsgi on... We could see what others reported: in 2.10, WSGI adds
a similar overhead to all type of requests (html, gif, swf, ...). So there
must have been something wrong in our initial test.

Again, Zope 2.8.8 remains the fastest version...

Something new that we could not see in the previous test is the evolution of
the results with the number of concurrent threads, as we have done the same
test with 1,2,5,10,20,50 and 100 threads.

Please have a look, and let me know what you think about these additional
results.

Thanks.

Pascal



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] Surprising load test results? (more results)

2006-10-09 Thread Lennart Regebro

On 10/9/06, Pascal Peregrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi all,

I have added ab tests at the end of the page.
(http://talk.lastminute.com/wiki/index.php/Loadtest)

These extra results confirm everything we had found so far, except for 2.10
with use-wsgi on... We could see what others reported: in 2.10, WSGI adds
a similar overhead to all type of requests (html, gif, swf, ...). So there
must have been something wrong in our initial test.

Again, Zope 2.8.8 remains the fastest version...

Something new that we could not see in the previous test is the evolution of
the results with the number of concurrent threads, as we have done the same
test with 1,2,5,10,20,50 and 100 threads.


Well, as seen here the number of requests peak at around five threads,
which is expected with Zopes default setting of four threads.


Please have a look, and let me know what you think about these additional
results.


They seem to largely contractictyour earlier results, where the
avergare response time for WSGI was similar for all document types.
Now they are not. Also, this time, 2.10 without WSGI ends up somewhere
between 2.9 and 2.10 with WSGI, while before 2.10 without WSGI was
slightly slower (but not that much) than 2.9.

So, basically, these tests are perhaps slightly less non-sensical than
your earlier tests, but still surprising. I don't see why Zope 2.10
would be so much slower than 2.9 in serving static content. There has
been no change there. Your first test was much more reasonable in that
area. This test is on the otehr hand much more reasonable for the WSGI
results.

--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.nuxeo.org/
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )