Re: [Zope] Surprising load test results? (more results)
Well, I should have removed the SpeedPack results for clarity... I might add these graphs today. But basically, the worrying thing is the performance degradation with each zope version... 2.8.8 seems to be the fastest, then 2.9, then 2.10... :( (even if you forget about WSGI) Pascal De : Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date : Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:46:39 +0200 À : Pascal Peregrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc : zope@zope.org zope@zope.org Objet : Re: [Zope] Surprising load test results? (more results) On 10/9/06, Pascal Peregrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have added ab tests at the end of the page. (http://talk.lastminute.com/wiki/index.php/Loadtest) These extra results confirm everything we had found so far, except for 2.10 with use-wsgi on... We could see what others reported: in 2.10, WSGI adds a similar overhead to all type of requests (html, gif, swf, ...). So there must have been something wrong in our initial test. Again, Zope 2.8.8 remains the fastest version... Something new that we could not see in the previous test is the evolution of the results with the number of concurrent threads, as we have done the same test with 1,2,5,10,20,50 and 100 threads. Well, as seen here the number of requests peak at around five threads, which is expected with Zopes default setting of four threads. Please have a look, and let me know what you think about these additional results. They seem to largely contractictyour earlier results, where the avergare response time for WSGI was similar for all document types. Now they are not. Also, this time, 2.10 without WSGI ends up somewhere between 2.9 and 2.10 with WSGI, while before 2.10 without WSGI was slightly slower (but not that much) than 2.9. So, basically, these tests are perhaps slightly less non-sensical than your earlier tests, but still surprising. I don't see why Zope 2.10 would be so much slower than 2.9 in serving static content. There has been no change there. Your first test was much more reasonable in that area. This test is on the otehr hand much more reasonable for the WSGI results. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.nuxeo.org/ ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Surprising load test results? (more results)
Hi all, I have added ab tests at the end of the page. (http://talk.lastminute.com/wiki/index.php/Loadtest) These extra results confirm everything we had found so far, except for 2.10 with use-wsgi on... We could see what others reported: in 2.10, WSGI adds a similar overhead to all type of requests (html, gif, swf, ...). So there must have been something wrong in our initial test. Again, Zope 2.8.8 remains the fastest version... Something new that we could not see in the previous test is the evolution of the results with the number of concurrent threads, as we have done the same test with 1,2,5,10,20,50 and 100 threads. Please have a look, and let me know what you think about these additional results. Thanks. Pascal ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Surprising load test results? (more results)
On 10/9/06, Pascal Peregrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have added ab tests at the end of the page. (http://talk.lastminute.com/wiki/index.php/Loadtest) These extra results confirm everything we had found so far, except for 2.10 with use-wsgi on... We could see what others reported: in 2.10, WSGI adds a similar overhead to all type of requests (html, gif, swf, ...). So there must have been something wrong in our initial test. Again, Zope 2.8.8 remains the fastest version... Something new that we could not see in the previous test is the evolution of the results with the number of concurrent threads, as we have done the same test with 1,2,5,10,20,50 and 100 threads. Well, as seen here the number of requests peak at around five threads, which is expected with Zopes default setting of four threads. Please have a look, and let me know what you think about these additional results. They seem to largely contractictyour earlier results, where the avergare response time for WSGI was similar for all document types. Now they are not. Also, this time, 2.10 without WSGI ends up somewhere between 2.9 and 2.10 with WSGI, while before 2.10 without WSGI was slightly slower (but not that much) than 2.9. So, basically, these tests are perhaps slightly less non-sensical than your earlier tests, but still surprising. I don't see why Zope 2.10 would be so much slower than 2.9 in serving static content. There has been no change there. Your first test was much more reasonable in that area. This test is on the otehr hand much more reasonable for the WSGI results. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.nuxeo.org/ ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )