[Zope-CMF] Re: trouble applying extension profiles
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 2 Apr 2006, at 09:34, Rob Miller wrote: it's in now, r66291. and i've also committed the .delete file support implementation, again on the 1.6 branch. if there are no complaints, i'll merge to 2.0 and trunk on monday. Thanks Rob! I hope Lennart and Yvo will take a look this weekend or Monday. My own goal (or the reason for making the corresponding collector issue a release blocker) was to just prevent content deletion as described in the issue. Anything beyond that I am neutral about. FWIW I don't have an opinion on this, as we don't use the content.py I/O export methods. The XML/NodeAdapterBase is enough for us. But I'm curious as to why there are two import/export frameworks, the config one (NodeAdapterBase) and the content one (FileSystemExporter). Couldn't they be merged? Or at least some adapters reused? Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Unauthorized errors on macro access
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3 Apr 2006, at 14:51, Tres Seaver wrote: I think it is actually blowing up trying to validate access to the 'macros' object from your view. I was able to work around that part by adding the following view class: - -- % from AccessControl.SecurityInfo import ClassSecurityInfo from Globals import InitializeClass from Products.Five.browser import BrowserView from Products.CMFCalendar.permissions import View class CalendarWidgetView(BrowserView): security = ClassSecurityInfo() security.declareProtected(View, 'macros') def _macros(self): return self.index.macros macros = property(_macros, None, None) InitializeClass(CalendarWidgetView) - -- % You're right, I did not mention that. Thanks a lot, I'll try that tonight! It simply had not occurred to me that security declarations can be put into a view class, the samples in CMFDefault did not need this. Might be able to finally merge it all in after that. Yay. jens -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEMSpfRAx5nvEhZLIRAhhEAJ9MRMNWvoOYWpDAlcRKBiI98aLXCwCcCq8q C3PpyXafRzCO9A+dFvXl/oY= =b3gX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] Re: trouble applying extension profiles
Hi Florent! Florent Guillaume wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 2 Apr 2006, at 09:34, Rob Miller wrote: it's in now, r66291. and i've also committed the .delete file support implementation, again on the 1.6 branch. if there are no complaints, i'll merge to 2.0 and trunk on monday. Thanks Rob! I hope Lennart and Yvo will take a look this weekend or Monday. My own goal (or the reason for making the corresponding collector issue a release blocker) was to just prevent content deletion as described in the issue. Anything beyond that I am neutral about. FWIW I don't have an opinion on this, as we don't use the content.py I/O export methods. The XML/NodeAdapterBase is enough for us. Same here. But I'm curious as to why there are two import/export frameworks, the config one (NodeAdapterBase) and the content one (FileSystemExporter). Couldn't they be merged? Or at least some adapters reused? I'd call them sub-frameworks. Both provide setup steps for the main framework. Nevertheless I agree that one sub-framework for both tasks should be enough. They both solve very similar problems with different design decisions and implementations. The current situation has historical reasons: Tres worked on the content handler and I worked on the configuration handlers. We never managed to discuss our different approaches and to agree on a common sub-framework. I'm not happy with this, but IMHO there are more important issues to resolve in GenericSetup. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: trouble applying extension profiles
On 4/2/06, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Rob! I hope Lennart and Yvo will take a look this weekend or Monday. I checked out the current 1.6 and ran some of our tests with it and has used it today, and it seems to work fine. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
