[Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - UNKNOWN: 4
This is the summary for test reports received on the cmf-tests list between 2011-09-19 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-09-20 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received [1]FAILED (failures=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux [2]FAILED (failures=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux [3]FAILED (failures=4) : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux [4]FAILED (failures=4) : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Non-OK results -- [1]UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-September/015268.html [2]UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-September/015269.html [3]UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=4) : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-September/015266.html [4]UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=4) : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-September/015267.html ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CatalogTool as utility
Hi Hanno! Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:56 PM, > yuppie wrote: >> But with zope.globalrequest we can avoid modifying the API. So if it is >> fine to smuggle a zope.globalrequest dependency in Zope 2.13, that might >> be the better solution. Or did you mean to use ZCatalog 2.14 only in CMF? > > I meant ZCatalog 2.14 only for CMF. > > Having independent distributions allows us to evolve them at a different pace > :) But an additional ZCatalog branch is an additional maintenance burden. And the required change is small and 100% backwards compatible. The zope.globalrequest dependency could be made optional. Do we really need an extra ZCatalog branch for that? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
