Re: [Zope-dev] connection commit ordering

2010-06-18 Thread Laurence Rowe
On 18 June 2010 01:24, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
 By the way, this issue is completely separate from the
 two-phase-commit discussion that we had recently, since all the
 connectors involved here are fully transactional.

As you can see here:

http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/browser/Zope/trunk/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py

def tpc_vote(self, *ignored):
self._finalize = 1

def tpc_finish(self, *ignored):

if self._finalize:
try: self._finish()
finally: self._registered=0

The transaction manager is only doing one phase commit. It sorts first
as it commits in the second phase. If you change the sort order, you
lose the guarantee of transactional integrity.

Perhaps a better way to solve this would be to include the zope
transaction id in the table, then in the background thread only
reindex the queued items with a tid = the current tid of the
connection.

Laurence
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 28 OK, 10 Failed

2010-06-18 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Jun 17 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Fri Jun 18 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 38 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 5 from ct 
at gocept.com, 16 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED : Total languishing bugs: 1
From: ct at gocept.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 20:30:17 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015413.html

Subject: FAILED : Total languishing bugs: 103
From: ct at gocept.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 20:36:17 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015414.html

Subject: FAILED : Total languishing bugs: 178
From: ct at gocept.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 20:41:08 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015415.html

Subject: FAILED : Total languishing bugs: 75
From: ct at gocept.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 20:45:29 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015416.html

Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 453 projects
From: ct at gocept.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 21:10:26 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015417.html

Subject: FAILED : BlueBream template / Python2.4.6 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Thu Jun 17 22:00:58 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015423.html

Subject: FAILED : BlueBream template / Python2.5.2 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Thu Jun 17 22:01:01 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015424.html

Subject: FAILED : BlueBream template / Python2.6.4 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Thu Jun 17 22:01:01 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015425.html

Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4.1 KGS / Python2.4.6 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Fri Jun 18 00:28:50 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015430.html

Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / ztk_win slave-win
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Fri Jun 18 07:22:59 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015442.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 08:52:11 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015407.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 08:54:45 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015408.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 08:54:51 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015409.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 08:59:43 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015410.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / ztk slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 09:29:03 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015411.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Thu Jun 17 09:36:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015412.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Jun 17 21:52:28 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015418.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Jun 17 21:54:39 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015419.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Jun 17 21:56:44 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015420.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Jun 17 21:58:54 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015421.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Jun 17 22:00:54 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015422.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Jun 17 22:02:54 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015426.html

Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Fri Jun 18 00:07:44 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015427.html

Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.2 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Fri Jun 18 00:09:00 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015428.html

Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.4 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Fri Jun 18 00:09:05 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015429.html

Subject: OK : Zope 3.4.1 KGS / Python2.5.2 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Fri Jun 18 00:51:46 EDT 2010
URL: 

Re: [Zope-dev] connection commit ordering

2010-06-18 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
Hi Laurence

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:06, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
 On 18 June 2010 01:24, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
 By the way, this issue is completely separate from the
 two-phase-commit discussion that we had recently, since all the
 connectors involved here are fully transactional.

 As you can see here:

 http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/browser/Zope/trunk/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py

    def tpc_vote(self, *ignored):
        self._finalize = 1

    def tpc_finish(self, *ignored):

        if self._finalize:
            try: self._finish()
            finally: self._registered=0

 The transaction manager is only doing one phase commit. It sorts first
 as it commits in the second phase. If you change the sort order, you
 lose the guarantee of transactional integrity.

For me this means that TM subclasses need to override tpc_vote and
implement a proper commit preparation [1] [2] to assure they are
correctly participating in the TPC dance.

And if that is not the case, but you have, for example, more than one
MySQL connector, you are already in a situation where you can't
guarantee transactional integrity, so this discussion is actually
orthogonal to the sortOrder one.

 Perhaps a better way to solve this would be to include the zope
 transaction id in the table, then in the background thread only
 reindex the queued items with a tid = the current tid of the
 connection.

Possibly, but is there a way to know the id of a transaction that
hasn't been committed yet, to store it on MySQL? Besides, when working
with multiple mount points, you might have to store multiple TIDs, for
all storages involved, or else there should be a global transaction ID
that should be recorded everywhere, and I don't see the 'transaction'
package providing one.

In any case, does anyone oppose the existence of a .setSortKey() on
the TM class?

Cheers,

Leo

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-prepare-transaction.html
[2] http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/xa.html
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] connection commit ordering

2010-06-18 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
 leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
 In any case, does anyone oppose the existence of a .setSortKey() on
 the TM class?

 Your branch looks simple enough. Feel free to merge it to Zope trunk
 but don't forget to add a change entry in doc/CHANGES.rst

Thanks. Can I commit it to Zope 2.12 as well? It is backward
compatible and helps us address a bug we see on production.

Cheers,
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] connection commit ordering

2010-06-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks. Can I commit it to Zope 2.12 as well? It is backward
 compatible and helps us address a bug we see on production.

Go ahead. It really is trivial :)

Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Bug day report

2010-06-18 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Roman Joost wrote:

 On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 07:59:18AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
 Roman, I landed my version of the fix in 'zope.testrunner', but didn't
 touch it in 'zope.testing', since you were working on it.  I was rushing
 a little because I wanted to release 'zope.testrunner', but wanted to
 check with you first.  The patch is here:

 http://svn.zope.org/zope.testrunner/trunk/src/zope/testrunner/find.py?rev=113540view=diffr1=113540r2=113539p1=zope.testrunner/trunk/src/zope/testrunner/find.pyp2=/zope.testrunner/trunk/src/zope/testrunner/find.py

 I'm fine with letting you land it in zope.testing, or even tweak it on
 the zope.testruner side, if you see a better fix.
 Thank you. I actually had troubles running all tests in zope.testrunner.
 I need to check why to be sure, to avoid commiting something broken.

Marius fixed the buildout for that.

 I usually prefer to let someone more experienced review my code,
 although it seems to be not worth it for this little fix.
 
 So to clarify - can I commit the patch to zope.testrunner after I
 verified that the tests are working fine on my local sandbox?

You should be able to check in just fine -- do you mean zope.testing, or
zope.testrunner?  I checked in my changes to zope.testrunner already.



Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkwbi6MACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5mQACg0BejhsCAi8jw696URNPJ/KKh
/6cAn0eFmusq+6EIlvSeudv+TdvpcG33
=6IHS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] connection commit ordering

2010-06-18 Thread Laurence Rowe
On 18 June 2010 14:32, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Laurence

 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:06, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
 On 18 June 2010 01:24, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
 By the way, this issue is completely separate from the
 two-phase-commit discussion that we had recently, since all the
 connectors involved here are fully transactional.

 As you can see here:

 http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/browser/Zope/trunk/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py

    def tpc_vote(self, *ignored):
        self._finalize = 1

    def tpc_finish(self, *ignored):

        if self._finalize:
            try: self._finish()
            finally: self._registered=0

 The transaction manager is only doing one phase commit. It sorts first
 as it commits in the second phase. If you change the sort order, you
 lose the guarantee of transactional integrity.

 For me this means that TM subclasses need to override tpc_vote and
 implement a proper commit preparation [1] [2] to assure they are
 correctly participating in the TPC dance.

zope.sqlalchemy does this, but that brings a whole orm into the
equation and does away with ZRDB legacy.

 And if that is not the case, but you have, for example, more than one
 MySQL connector, you are already in a situation where you can't
 guarantee transactional integrity, so this discussion is actually
 orthogonal to the sortOrder one.

That's true, but don't you see this problem even with only a single
ZODB and a single ZRDB connection?

 Perhaps a better way to solve this would be to include the zope
 transaction id in the table, then in the background thread only
 reindex the queued items with a tid = the current tid of the
 connection.

 Possibly, but is there a way to know the id of a transaction that
 hasn't been committed yet, to store it on MySQL? Besides, when working
 with multiple mount points, you might have to store multiple TIDs, for
 all storages involved, or else there should be a global transaction ID
 that should be recorded everywhere, and I don't see the 'transaction'
 package providing one.

The ZODB storage's transaction id is set in tpc_begin, so you should
be able to get it in tcp_vote or tpc_finish of the ZRDB data manager.
Though doing so probably horribly complicates the ZSQLCatalog code.

 In any case, does anyone oppose the existence of a .setSortKey() on
 the TM class?

I don't oppose it, but I also don't see how this will fix the problem
unless you set the sort key to be greater than the ZODB's sort key.
This strikes me as a very bad idea for a TM that is designed to
tpc_finish before anything else.

Laurence
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )