Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Unify the Zope 2 and Zope 3 repositories!
Chris Withers wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Follow this thread: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2005-November/016561.html *grunt* *sigh* It has to happen at some stage, surely? Jim suggested a different strategy with Zope 5 (http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2006-February/018415.html). The little bits and pieces that make up Zope 3 (the zope.* packages) would be developed more or less independently of Zope-the-app-server (which would only be one product called Zope 5 and incorporate ideas from Zope 2 and 3 and use those bits and pieces). Philipp ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Stable / Development branches?
Chris Withers wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: I for one, is NOT interested in backporting fixed in Five trunk to both Five 1.0, 1.1, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5, which is what are the current versions of Five if we say that Zope 2.8 and 2.7 should be still supported after the release of 2.10. We don't talk about Zope 2.7 which is dead. ...except for all the people still using it ;-) It's dead from a maintenance point of view. If you still want to maintain it, be our guest. But you yourself said that maintaining too many branches is madness. There's nothing wrong with software being in production whose particular line isn't maintained anymore. I have Linux kernels 2.4 and Apaches 1.3 in production. What's your point? Philipp ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Stable / Development branches?
On 6/21/06, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's nothing wrong with software being in production whose particular line isn't maintained anymore. I have Linux kernels 2.4 and Apaches 1.3 in production. What's your point? I checked what all my websites run. They are all on Zope 2.5. No problemas. :) -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6268 Blamelist: benji_york,fdrake,jim,regebro,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed svn sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Zope3-dev] Displaying ReStructered Text
Hello, I've written this question to zope3-users already, but I got only one replay which has not helped me I have a document written in ReStructered Text and I want to display it with Zope3 (of course converted to HTML). How can I do that? Thanks, Florian ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 trunk 2.4 FreeBSD tmiddleton
Tim Peters wrote at 2006-6-17 14:50 -0400: ... The problem arises because what _Python_ calls int is what C calls long, but the I-flavor BTree code stores C int, and C int doesn't correspond to any Python type (except by accident on 32-bit boxes). Why not simply change this, i.e. let BTree use what Python calls an int (i.e. a C long). Of course, we need to be a bit careful, when we load pickles. They might have been written by applications with a longer C long than we have. But, this problem we have anyway (independent of BTrees). -- Dieter ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
