Hello.
Please don't review these yet. I'm making some modifications
to make them much more robust. We should have a new version of
the tests in maybe one hour (at most).
Regards,
Denis.
Hi Pavel,
I think these are 2D tests. I'm copying 2d-dev@, and BCC'ing awt-...@.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 12/14/2010 5:27 PM, Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to add five new regression tests which check 2D renderer
behaviour. Corrections checked by these tests were already pushed
Changeset: 4d6f9aaa2600
Author:flar
Date: 2010-12-14 13:25 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/jdk/rev/4d6f9aaa2600
6766342: Improve performance of Ductus rasterizer
Reviewed-by: jgodinez, prr
! make/sun/awt/make.depend
! make/sun/awt/mapfile-vers
!
Hi Jim.
You might want to submit it as a separate push and get credit for
fixing 4645692 (solveCubic doesn't return all answers),
Sure, that sounds good. Reading through the code I found, I spotted
a few things that might have been problematic in some extremely
rare cases. I've been working on
Hi Denis,
That sounds like some very good ideas for making this method very accurate.
On the other hand, we're starting to get into the territory where an
advanced math package should be catering to these requirements. The
solveCubic was an internal helper function for implementing the hit
