Phil,
Just on Project Jigsaw and moving to a modular JDK then we've been doing
preparatory work for this for several years (it had its own JEP in JDK 8
for example). There isn't a JEP yet proposing a Modular JDK but
hopefully soon. In the mean-time I think we have to continue the
clean-up
On 2014-02-27 22:33, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
Leaving aside jigsaw, and regardless of whether they are modifiable,
the question as to whether at runtime they should live in rt.jar or
jre/lib
is a separate question than where they would live in the source tree
and one does not necessarily follow
* Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com [2014-02-20 17:43]:
The following is a preliminary webrev that allows OpenJDK to build and
run against a system-installed copy of lcms2 rather than the copy
bundled with OpenJDK:
root: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-lcms/00/
jdk:
The moving of most of these files will cause me some significant pain.
I am not convinced why its necessary. And if done wrong we lose the
history. Even if done *right* the history is harder to get at.
Plus the jigsaw people are very likely to move this code *again*.
I need to look at this more,
* Phil Race philip.r...@oracle.com [2014-02-28 16:46]:
The moving of most of these files will cause me some significant pain.
Oh. Sorry :(
Is there anything I (or possibly the jigsaw folks) can do to minimize
it?
I am not convinced why its necessary.
Basically, there is one file there
