On 5/11/18, 2:58 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine,
Note that the problem list should be updated.
Yes, I remembered that after sending out the webrev.
Fixed in the push.
-phil.
On 11/05/2018 14:46, Phil Race wrote:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198412
webrev:
Looks fine,
Note that the problem list should be updated.
On 11/05/2018 14:46, Phil Race wrote:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198412
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8198412/
Updates the test to make sure we even support ascii as monospaced before
testing the other
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198412
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8198412/
Updates the test to make sure we even support ascii as monospaced before
testing the other ranges. Also makes sure the code points it is testing are
supported else the test may not be valid
Hi,
> This moves the Java 2D demo from "closed" to "open".
> It is now called "J2Ddemo" to avoid any trademark questions.
> This has already been reviewed internally and the images here are OK to
> keep.
This is awesome news :)
Java2Demo is such a handy tool to visually check various features
+1
On 11/05/2018 12:24, Philip Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198991
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8198991/
This moves the Java 2D demo from "closed" to "open".
It is now called "J2Ddemo" to avoid any trademark questions.
This has already been reviewed
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198991
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8198991/
This moves the Java 2D demo from "closed" to "open".
It is now called "J2Ddemo" to avoid any trademark questions.
This has already been reviewed internally and the images here are OK to
keep.
