On 10/11/19 3:43 pm, Philip Race wrote:
On 10/11/19, 2:52 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil.
It looks like after the fix we will skip the call "unregisterDeferral" and
the ProfileActivator which was registered by the
"ProfileDeferralMgr.registerDeferral" will not be removed --> memory leak?
On 10/11/19, 2:52 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil.
It looks like after the fix we will skip the call "unregisterDeferral"
and
the ProfileActivator which was registered by the
"ProfileDeferralMgr.registerDeferral" will not be removed --> memory
leak?
I discussed that below in my initi
PS ..
BTW do we have an option to mark this "finalize" as forRemoval=true or
just delete it?(example JDK-8159009/JDK-8212198)
This will be for a backport, so that would be inappropriate even if I
wanted to address that now ..
-phil.
Hi, Phil.
It looks like after the fix we will skip the call "unregisterDeferral" and
the ProfileActivator which was registered by the
"ProfileDeferralMgr.registerDeferral" will not be removed --> memory leak?
BTW do we have an option to mark this "finalize" as forRemoval=true or just
delete it?
+1
On 10/11/19 6:39 am, Philip Race wrote:
Ok by me.
-phil
On 10/10/19, 11:34 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Phil, Sergey
Then, is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8223158/webrev.2/ good to
check-in?
Regards
Prasanta
On 11-Oct-19 2:28 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 10/10/19 1:35 pm
Bug: ICC_Profile has un-needed, not-empty finalize method
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8175984/
This is a native memory utilisation problem due to delay in collecting and
freeing ICC_Profiles and their associated classes and data.
The color management engine is native code and consume
Ok by me.
-phil
On 10/10/19, 11:34 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Phil, Sergey
Then, is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8223158/webrev.2/ good
to check-in?
Regards
Prasanta
On 11-Oct-19 2:28 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 10/10/19 1:35 pm, Phil Race wrote:
> I guess at a minimum we
