Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk/client.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252070
Fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8252070/webrev.01
Some of our code assumes that the native system(XRender, D3D, OGL) makes some
effective optimizations, but in some cases, we can do better.
On 27.08.2020 12:55, Philip Race wrote:
SAP or IBM can look at it if they want as a separate fix.
ok, +1
-phil.
On 8/27/20, 12:45 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil.
Probably we could enable WARNINGS_AS_ERRORS_xlc as well? I guess we will need a
confirmation from the SAP gurus.
On
Hi, Conor.
Please use such spec for the protected constructor: "Constructor for subclasses to
call":
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8250850/webrev.1/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/plaf/metal/MetalTheme.java.sdiff.html
Actually the current text is also fine to me, but looks
All,
Contingent on Project Skara (ie mercurial ->git / githib) going active
for the JDK project on schedule
on 5th September, we intend to retire the jdk/client repo/forest as part
of this transition.
In other words, once mercurial is shut down and we move to git there
will ONLY be the main
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245400
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8245400/
A rotuine 3rd party library upgrade.
All platforms build + all tests pass.
-phil.
Hello all,
Could someone please review my changes for JDK-8250855, 'Address
reliance on default constructors in the Java 2D APIs'? This issue
relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors in
the java.desktop module'. The changes address the reliance on default
On 2020-08-27 21:39, Philip Race wrote:
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074844
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8074844/index.html
Looks good to me.
Thank you Phil for cleaning this up!
/Magnus
This resolves the disabled compiler warnings in what is now quite a