On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:17:58 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> Ok, sorry for the distraction.
>
> Our local Santuario maintainer says:
>
> In general, changes to Apache Santuario should also be made at Apache so we
> stay in sync.
Hi @doom369, I hope we didn't end up wasting too much of your tim
Hi all,
I still need a second reviewer for this change. Thanks.
s'marks
On 8/3/15 1:49 PM, Phil Race wrote:
CCC is approved. So I will give this a "+1" .. you just need one other reviewer
(if
you did not get that already) and you can push.
-phil.
On 07/27/2015 07:10 PM, Stu
Hi all,
Please review this following code and API change:
Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068749
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/8068749/webrev.0/
The change is to be pushed into the jdk9/client forest.
The background is that this is a "prepar
On 9/11/12 1:41 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
* By contrast lines 1035 and 1115 here are now much, much > 80 chars
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~art/Bugathon-2012/webrev.imageio/src/share/classes/javax/imageio/ImageIO.java.sdiff.html
Also for both of these cases, you added .asSubClass(..).
Now when I
Michael,
Thanks for splitting up the patches and revising them in response to the review
comments.
I'm not yet entirely sure how to proceed with pushing these changes. I think
Chris assumed that I would push these changes. Since these are in awt,
printing, and beans, the changes might need t
