On 7/8/2010 12:40 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi Phil,
I see the problem now. I looked at what T2K (the rasteriser) reports, but
in the non-T2K glue code we then make an adjustment in the case of LCD
glyphs
which simply should never have been applied in the case of an empty image.
It has ne
Hi Phil,
> I see the problem now. I looked at what T2K (the rasteriser) reports, but
> in the non-T2K glue code we then make an adjustment in the case of LCD
> glyphs
> which simply should never have been applied in the case of an empty image.
> It has never affected any of our code as I think we
I see the problem now. I looked at what T2K (the rasteriser) reports, but
in the non-T2K glue code we then make an adjustment in the case of LCD
glyphs
which simply should never have been applied in the case of an empty image.
It has never affected any of our code as I think we only truly use th
Hi Phil,
Strange, running your test I get width=-1 when uploading as well as
rendering the glyph - and the pipeline basically just reads the native
GlyphInfo structure by using Unsafe.
> I'll have to think about it a bit more ..
Anything I could to to help to track that down?
Thanks, Clemens
Hi Phil,
The whitespace one, I'm not aware that T2K will do this.
> I find that it sets it width and height to zero for whitespace.
> I instrumented the rasteriser and ran with code like this.
>
Wow, actually that took me quite a while to figure out what was going wrong.
T2K does set width=-1 f
Hi Phil,
> I thought I sent this email last week but I just found a very patient
> thunderbird compose window :-(
No problem, thanks for the reply
Until next week I am (again) really busy, after that I have plenty of
time to investigate the issue :)
I also have another fix which resolves some pr
Clemens,
I thought I sent this email last week but I just found a very patient
thunderbird compose window :-(
For the record, anyone with an openjdk user id should be able to
upload webrevs to cr.openjdk.java.net.
As to the fixes : The Jules one looks fine.
I can create you a bug ID.
The wh
On 15 June 2010 14:40, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to get two (very small) changes to the xrender-pipeline in:
>
> 1. http://93.83.133.214/ignore-whitespace-width.zip deals with the
> fact that the closed-source
> font rasterizer seems to generate width=65535 for whitespaces, wh
Hi,
I would like to get two (very small) changes to the xrender-pipeline in:
1. http://93.83.133.214/ignore-whitespace-width.zip deals with the
fact that the closed-source
font rasterizer seems to generate width=65535 for whitespaces, which
resuts in software fallbacks.
Granted with height=0 rend