On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:30 PM Philip Race wrote:
>
> I confess to not being 100% sure which one you thing is in some way
> "unexpected".
>
> I *think* you are complaining only about the large size rendering of
> cambria in 3.png
> BEFORE the fix and that it is equally blurry with or without the
I confess to not being 100% sure which one you thing is in some way
"unexpected".
I *think* you are complaining only about the large size rendering of
cambria in 3.png
BEFORE the fix and that it is equally blurry with or without the fix.
I don't have my usual tools handy to check but that
Hi Phil and all,
I was working on backporting this to 11:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214481
When I realised this is actually a regression in that it makes
rendering on OpenJDK worse in some cases.
I've been testing with 8, 11, 13 and 15 and 11 patched and comparing
those the
