On 12/15/2014 11:48 AM, Phil Race wrote:
On 12/12/14 5:35 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hi Phil,
On 12/12/2014 12:46 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
You did not provide a direct reference to the set of warnings that
were generated.
fortunately I found it here :-
On 12/12/2014 20:46, Phil Race wrote:
:
2) Some significant fraction of all the warnings are for getPeer() :-
dev/jdk/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/Container.java:821:
warning: [deprecation] getPeer() in Component has been deprecated
The issue here is that the deprecation javadoc
Hi,
You did not provide a direct reference to the set of warnings that were
generated.
fortunately I found it here :-
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066622
A couple of things I find 'unfortunate' are
1) In order to avoid a deprecation warning on one call/line of a 100
line method,
Hi Phil,
On 12/12/2014 12:46 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
You did not provide a direct reference to the set of warnings that
were generated.
fortunately I found it here :-
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066622
Each Suppress deprecations warnings in foo bug is linked to a Fix
On 12/10/2014 10:20 PM, Victor D'yakov wrote:
Do we need to split it to AWT, Swing and 2D?
I would not find that helpful.
The email is to 3 lists and its not clear who would pick up reviewing it.
I assume the people in each are would review their piece of the change.
Also please use
Hello,
In support of JEP 212: Resolve Lint and Doclint Warnings
(http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/212), which is targeted to JDK 9, please
review the large but straightforward set of changes in the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8066621.0/
Some background of the approach being
