Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

2016-09-24 Thread Masayoshi Okutsu
Looks good to me. Masayoshi On 9/24/2016 2:00 PM, Philip Race wrote: 1) version change is only if the format is incompatible - so no change there. 2) paths being absent is not a new issue. It has always been the case that a file is not present on a system at runtime. This was historically ver

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

2016-09-24 Thread Vadim Pakhnushev
+1 Vadim On 24.09.2016 8:00, Philip Race wrote: 1) version change is only if the format is incompatible - so no change there. 2) paths being absent is not a new issue. It has always been the case that a file is not present on a system at runtime. This was historically very common. The implem

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

2016-09-23 Thread Philip Race
1) version change is only if the format is incompatible - so no change there. 2) paths being absent is not a new issue. It has always been the case that a file is not present on a system at runtime. This was historically very common. The implementation should handle this. -phil. On 9/23/16, 8

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

2016-09-23 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
The changes looks fine, should we increment version=1 to other version or it is not used? Unrelated question is how we validate all these paths if some of them are absent? On 23.09.16 8:08, Philip Race wrote: PING .. any takers on this two week old RFR ? -phil. On 9/8/16, 1:12 PM, Philip Rac

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

2016-09-22 Thread Philip Race
PING .. any takers on this two week old RFR ? -phil. On 9/8/16, 1:12 PM, Philip Race wrote: [Fix i18n-dev address] -phil. On 9/8/16, 1:10 PM, Philip Race wrote: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162531 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8162531/ Solaris 10 is not supported

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

2016-09-08 Thread Philip Race
[Fix i18n-dev address] -phil. On 9/8/16, 1:10 PM, Philip Race wrote: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162531 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8162531/ Solaris 10 is not supported by JDK 9. This updates the fontconfig file to focus on the default set of fonts installed on S

[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8162531solaris.fontconfig.properties needs updating

2016-09-08 Thread Philip Race
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162531 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8162531/ Solaris 10 is not supported by JDK 9. This updates the fontconfig file to focus on the default set of fonts installed on Solaris 11 as part its desktop. Preference is given to the Arial, Times